Hi
@maccareadsalot
“@factfinders 1% is just outrageously silly IMO (no criticism intended FF).”
I agree completely it is outrageously silly in my opinion as well.
The 1% was born out of the need to counter trolls over at HC and occasionally here though they die a painful death in obscurity here thanks to
@zeeb0t
The trolls and manipulators would attack the market cap of Brainchip right through to $2.34 because of an absence of income.
However just like Peter van der Made and Sean Hehir I have a reasonable grasp of the size of the addressable market and as
stated by Marc Steimer every dumb sensor in the World and beyond needs to be made smart.
I have also understood thanks to others in particular
@Diogenese that Brainchip has a rock solid wall of patents protecting, what even Russian academics have discovered, the ability to one shot and incrementally learn on device at ludicrously low power.
Knowing these facts and knowing that a credible assessment has been made that the semiconductor market for Automotive Industry will be 200 billion by 2030 and Brainchip has been taken on board Mercedes Benz, Ford, Valeo, Renesas, MegaChips, ARM, SiFive and Nviso and others who play in this space it is impossible to credibly argue that being first to market, patent protected and unique will not guarantee one tiny little percent of the US 200 billion dollar automotive semiconductor market.
One percent of US 200 billion is US 2 billion dollars.
TWO BILLION DOLLARS IN REVENUE EASILY JUSTIFIES A PRESENT SHARE PRICE OF THE $2.34 WHICH SOME CLAIMED WAS OVER VALUED.
To this potential Brainchip can add every other market under the sun where currently dumb sensors are utilised plus all those markets still to be discovered.
Again how can anyone who understands the Brainchip AKIDA Technology advances suggest they will not capture an additional one percent of these markets.
You see the strength of the ONE PERCENT ARGUMENT is that it is outrageously silly but even at one percent the revenue stream is unbelievable.
Anyone who understands Brainchip and its technology advantage could never credibly state that it was overvalued at these levels.
As I noted the other day ARM caused to be shipped 29 billion semiconductors in the last 12 months.
Renesas has shipped one billion of just one of its MCUs.
The addressable market is in the trillions of dollars as Kathy Woods has stated.
If you are unable to understand the success that is knocking at Brainchip’s door and that even capturing as little as one percent of the addressable market will mean in my opinion you should not be invested here or you have another agenda that does not align with the interests of genuine investors.
My silly opinion with a purpose only so DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA