Is that why wine bottles don't have corks anymore?I thought NASA did that with their Astronaut's body functions?
Is that why wine bottles don't have corks anymore?I thought NASA did that with their Astronaut's body functions?
Maybe ASX is planning to use AKIDA to control Shorting?Taking about marketing the Commsec interview with Sean Hehir was advertised on 25 May, 2022 it is now 28 May, 2022.
It was Tweeted about by both Brainchip and Commsec and no date of release mentioned by either party.
Why the delay in it being published?
Crazy speculation did they discuss something in advance of it occurring which by agreement Commsec is delaying the release until it occurs???
It cannot be my birthday because that was earlier this month so what might it be???
My wild speculation no research required DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
I have to confess I didn't vote. Thank you for raising my awareness, I will in future. Thank you FFI have been giving the vote against Peter van der Made a great deal of thought and looking at the numbers.
Why did I give it so much thought well because a poster here expressed remorse about having not bothered to vote.
I therefore have decided we need to start now and marshal the retail vote for next years AGM for two reasons.
The first is we need to let Peter van der Made know that he is appreciated and fully supported by retail for his genius and generosity in allowing us to share in his creation and in due course his wealth.
The second is to let the party or parties that engaged in this display of strength know that retail will have none of this nonsense in future. I have calculated based on the figures in the Annual Report the following:
1. Retail holders in the category of less than 100,000 shares have total voting rights of 388,154,326
2. Retail holders in the category of more than 100,000 shares and less than 5,800,000* have total voting rights of 575,226,045
(* 5,800,000 is the last holder in the top 20 list)
3. Peter van der Made received 238,100,194 votes
4. This means as a starting point there were at least 105,054,132 votes by retail investors with less than 100,000 shares not voted.
5. Of the 575,226,045 shares above 100,000 and below 5,800,000 I am allowing that 50% of these are held by institutions of one form and
another which leaves a further 286,113,022 shares at least which could have been voted in favour of Peter van der Made.
6. This means had all of retail voted for Peter van der Made he would have received a total vote of at least 629,267,384 votes the most of any
Director.
Now retail investors should note that to stop any takeover all you need is a blocking vote of 25% of the shares entitled to vote and it just so happens that retail investors at 629,267,384 shares (which is a minimum) well exceed 30% of the shares on issue and can decide if a takeover offer is accepted. Had retail voted for Peter van der Made in these numbers a clear message would have been sent to Brainchip about the importance of the retail vote.
I do not say this to rabble rouse but simply to make the point that we retail have much more power than most understand and all companies rely upon this lack of understanding by retail most of the time.
As a retail shareholder I am not putting that retail should in anyway control the day to day operations of the company but retail shareholders should be properly respected by all parties including institutions and those with 100 million share voting blocks who are trying to kick some shins for whatever vested stakeholder reason/s.
Brainchip is a public company. Retail shareholders with one share have the same rights as someone with 100 million shares but they need to vote to have their position as a retail shareholder respected and acknowledged.
I will leave it to you all to ponder but in this electronic age retail should be able to come together as a block and vote as a block to ensure that no individual or institutional investor with six times less voting power can manipulate the company to their ends behind the scenes.
My opinion only so do your own research and remember my maths is poor sometimes so DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Very happy to be a part of this FF. I have about 1/1000th of that retail vote and you have my support as does Peter.I have been giving the vote against Peter van der Made a great deal of thought and looking at the numbers.
Why did I give it so much thought well because a poster here expressed remorse about having not bothered to vote.
I therefore have decided we need to start now and marshal the retail vote for next years AGM for two reasons.
The first is we need to let Peter van der Made know that he is appreciated and fully supported by retail for his genius and generosity in allowing us to share in his creation and in due course his wealth.
The second is to let the party or parties that engaged in this display of strength know that retail will have none of this nonsense in future. I have calculated based on the figures in the Annual Report the following:
1. Retail holders in the category of less than 100,000 shares have total voting rights of 388,154,326
2. Retail holders in the category of more than 100,000 shares and less than 5,800,000* have total voting rights of 575,226,045
(* 5,800,000 is the last holder in the top 20 list)
3. Peter van der Made received 238,100,194 votes
4. This means as a starting point there were at least 105,054,132 votes by retail investors with less than 100,000 shares not voted.
5. Of the 575,226,045 shares above 100,000 and below 5,800,000 I am allowing that 50% of these are held by institutions of one form and
another which leaves a further 286,113,022 shares at least which could have been voted in favour of Peter van der Made.
6. This means had all of retail voted for Peter van der Made he would have received a total vote of at least 629,267,384 votes the most of any
Director.
Now retail investors should note that to stop any takeover all you need is a blocking vote of 25% of the shares entitled to vote and it just so happens that retail investors at 629,267,384 shares (which is a minimum) well exceed 30% of the shares on issue and can decide if a takeover offer is accepted. Had retail voted for Peter van der Made in these numbers a clear message would have been sent to Brainchip about the importance of the retail vote.
I do not say this to rabble rouse but simply to make the point that we retail have much more power than most understand and all companies rely upon this lack of understanding by retail most of the time.
As a retail shareholder I am not putting that retail should in anyway control the day to day operations of the company but retail shareholders should be properly respected by all parties including institutions and those with 100 million share voting blocks who are trying to kick some shins for whatever vested stakeholder reason/s.
Brainchip is a public company. Retail shareholders with one share have the same rights as someone with 100 million shares but they need to vote to have their position as a retail shareholder respected and acknowledged.
I will leave it to you all to ponder but in this electronic age retail should be able to come together as a block and vote as a block to ensure that no individual or institutional investor with six times less voting power can manipulate the company to their ends behind the scenes.
My opinion only so do your own research and remember my maths is poor sometimes so DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Nope he does not have a point imo, just because ARM have other partners.....doesn't mean to say they haven't traded up and discontinued using whoever they were before...............WHY WOULD THEY continue using their old AI partners, they now have BRN???Evening all.
I’ve been having a look at the interchange on Twitter between @AusEire and Jag Sanger from TMH.
Jay has a crack at BRN by asking ‘how many AI partners does Arm embedded have’?
The implication as I understand it, is there are heaps of partners. Therefore, the implication is that BRN’s partnership is not worth much at all.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Does he have a point? Surely not?
Thanks all.
Panda
Irregardless of how many AI partners ARM have, would rather be one of them than not.Evening all.
I’ve been having a look at the interchange on Twitter between @AusEire and Jag Sanger from TMH.
Jay has a crack at BRN by asking ‘how many AI partners does Arm embedded have’?
The implication as I understand it, is there are heaps of partners. Therefore, the implication is that BRN’s partnership is not worth much at all.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Does he have a point? Surely not?
Thanks all.
Panda
DA FARK does this have to do with BRN?Evening all.
I’ve been having a look at the interchange on Twitter between @AusEire and Jag Sanger from TMH.
Jay has a crack at BRN by asking ‘how many AI partners does Arm embedded have’?
The implication as I understand it, is there are heaps of partners. Therefore, the implication is that BRN’s partnership is not worth much at all.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Does he have a point? Surely not?
Thanks all.
Panda
Evening all.
I’ve been having a look at the interchange on Twitter between @AusEire and Jag Sanger from TMH.
Jay has a crack at BRN by asking ‘how many AI partners does Arm embedded have’?
The implication as I understand it, is there are heaps of partners. Therefore, the implication is that BRN’s partnership is not worth much at all.
Can anyone shed some light on this for me? Does he have a point? Surely not?
Thanks all.
Panda
1% of 29Bill is in fact 290 mills Fact Finder is factual yet again"So think about this just one tiny little percent of 29 billion chips is 290,000,000 or TWO HUNDRED AND NINETY MILLION CHIPS. WOW."
Hey @Fact Finder.
Either the beers I've had have kicked in hard but I think your math is off a bit on that equation?
I acknowledged my brain fart shortly after.1% of 29Bill is in fact 290 mills Fact Finder is factual yet again
ARM has 72 partners listed as AI Hardware providers:Nope he does not have a point imo, just because ARM have other partners.....also means nothing. Nothing to say they haven't traded up and discontinue using whoever they were before...............WHY WOULD THEY continue using their old AI partners, they now have BRN???
There will be a sh*t tonne of Ai companies that won't survive the next few years because of BRN i think. My opinion only. Plus Jag is a dick downramper so there's always that too..............
Yes you do. LiarARM has 72 partners listed as AI Hardware providers:
https://www.arm.com/partners/catalog/results#f:Industry=[Artificial Intelligence,Hardware Provider]
I don't know how many of them have SNNs with on-chip-one-shot-learning ...
Just when I thought I'd got away with it!Yes you do. Liar