Mugen74
Regular
Another smiling BRN investor hereI'll 'fess up to being a super sloth.
Another smiling BRN investor hereI'll 'fess up to being a super sloth.
Is that a Texan accent?10 tARM's Microsoft
Well I can tell you MF were pushing APX and A2M hard a couple of years ago as growth stocks before those stocks went on to lose most of their value. In APX's case it lost over 80% of its value and that was before the current correction. Yet they appear to downramp BRN which in the same period has gone up over 1000%. It actually makes me angry for the sake of your average retail investor who really doesn't know anything much about fundamental or technical analysis and is very likely to be influenced by these sorts of organisations. It has only reinforced my view that you can't blindly listen to other people, that you not only have to do your own research but you have to educate yourself first about fundamental and technical analysis so that you can understand and process what you have researched in an intelligent way.Do they still have the five better stock picks than BRN.
I really wonder about the market regulators who allow this form of marketing to continue day after day year after year.
Run an add saying to the public at large this or that company is a dud do not invest in it but pay us money and we will tell you a company that is a winner.
If the model was we know a company that is a dud pay us money to find out which one it is and we will also tell you which one is a winner fair enough but I think the current model is flawed and should be banned.
In BRN’s case they do not give full disclosure that when it was 4 cents they were telling everyone it was a dud and that they had five better stocks.
It would be interesting what those stocks have done up until today.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Another smiling BRN investor here
Reminds me of what one of my teachers said to Alan Jones (not that one) in grade 8 -Well I can tell you MF were pushing APX and A2M hard a couple of years ago as growth stocks before those stocks went on to lose most of their value. In APX's case it lost over 80% of its value and that was before the current correction. Yet they appear to downramp BRN which in the same period has gone up over 1000%. It actually makes me angry for the sake of your average retail investor who really doesn't know anything much about fundamental or technical analysis and is very likely to be influenced by these sorts of organisations. It has only reinforced my view that you can't blindly listen to other people, that you not only have to do your own research but you have to educate yourself first about fundamental and technical analysis so that you can understand and process what you have researched in an intelligent way.
I wish the Fools would agree to an ARMistice with BrainchipWell I can tell you MF were pushing APX and A2M hard a couple of years ago as growth stocks before those stocks went on to lose most of their value. In APX's case it lost over 80% of its value and that was before the current correction. Yet they appear to downramp BRN which in the same period has gone up over 1000%. It actually makes me angry for the sake of your average retail investor who really doesn't know anything much about fundamental or technical analysis and is very likely to be influenced by these sorts of organisations. It has only reinforced my view that you can't blindly listen to other people, that you not only have to do your own research but you have to educate yourself first about fundamental and technical analysis so that you can understand and process what you have researched in an intelligent way.
So Alan now works for motley fool?Reminds me of what one of my teachers said to Alan Jones (not that one) in grade 8 -
"In the exam you should think very carefully about what the answer should be ... and write the opposite."
This was the same teacher who described the same AJ as "a moonfaced creep" - ah, the good old days.
Does anyone remember Shares magazine? I wonder if all the contributors migrated to MF?Do they still have the five better stock picks than BRN.
I really wonder about the market regulators who allow this form of marketing to continue day after day year after year.
Run an add saying to the public at large this or that company is a dud do not invest in it but pay us money and we will tell you a company that is a winner.
If the model was we know a company that is a dud pay us money to find out which one it is and we will also tell you which one is a winner fair enough but I think the current model is flawed and should be banned.
In BRN’s case they do not give full disclosure that when it was 4 cents they were telling everyone it was a dud and that they had five better stocks.
It would be interesting what those stocks have done up until today.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
No - he was much smarter than that!So Alan now works for motley fool?
Come to think of it, I can't see why it shouldn't be ...Reminds me of what one of my teachers said to Alan Jones (not that one) in grade 8 -
"In the exam you should think very carefully about what the answer should be ... and write the opposite."
This was the same teacher who described the same AJ as "a moonfaced creep" - ah, the good old days.
... that one.Come to think of it, I can't see why it shouldn't be ...
You guys just keep feeding me. No doubt he has done an ARMazing job. Simply ARMazing. FFDespite the correction in global stocks, given BRN's stellar performance of late the 1000 eyes know that they at least have no cause for alARM. A Really Magnificent time to be a shareholder. We will win Any Race for Market share in the edge AI space thanks to our great partnerships and the strategic vision of the company.
ARM puns aside, is it just me or does anyone else feel that Jerome Nadel has made a really significant difference in a relatively short space of time?