Tony Lewis makes the point that "events" and "spikes" are different, spikes being singal-valued occurrences, while events each have an individual magnitude value.Pinched this from FF over on the crapper.
A video and transcript. I did the read.
Exract: Note my bolded area:
" Jon Tapson (JT): At BrainChip, we are currently finishing off our Akita 2.0 architecture. And this is an expansion on all of BrainChip’s prior work. It’s essentially a neuromorphic chip, it’s event-based, and it makes use of the intrinsic sparsity in signals to achieve high levels of efficiency.But we have the same problem that any company has that does actual… there’s an enormous difference between research silicon, if I can put it that way, and commercial silicon. And the problem with commercial silicon is you’ve got to fit into the ecosystem of what everybody else is doing. The history of startup companies is littered with companies that had fantastic technology, but couldn’t progress across the interface to regular technology. The real problem is if you build a chip, the chip by itself is not a solution to anything. It’s got to go on a board, it’s got to have a software ecosystem around it. And the easier that is for customers and engineers to access, the better everything’s going to go."
From my bold above its easy to see why AKIDA 1000 and 1500 are now gaining traction. AKIDA is no longer in research and actually commercial and we fit into the eco system of what everyone else is doing.
Its taken time but we are seeing the proof unfold before our eyes right now.
The AKIDA1000 fit with QV gives us the 'only game in town" cybersecurity with a Defence name in Lockheed- Martin to sell it.
AKIDA 1000 and more recently the 1500 gets the wheels of Bascom Hunter moving and they aim to be a leader in Defence.
AKIDA1000 gives its partner Frontgrade the 'frontrunning' in Space.
I expect to see more of this as engagements that have been on for quite some time come to fruition.
We make our eco system partners better.
This sort of aligns with my thoughts on why Jason Eschragian stated that he did not think Akida was "neuromorphic" in that analog SNN developers think spikes as single valued and accumulate in neurons until they reach the firing threshold, even thought Edgar Adrian's 1920s paper, the inspiration for Simon Thorpe's N-of-M coding, showed there is more to it than that. A lot of the early analog SNNs used rate coding, the rate at which spikes repeated or oscillated. Thorpe utilized the relationship between spike amplitude and timing.
Last edited: