BRN Discussion Ongoing

TopCat

Regular


🚨 Major Announcement!
⚓ #Thales has delivered the first-in-the-world series production autonomous mine countermeasure drone system to the French Navy. This delivery is part of the Franco-British #MMCM (Maritime Mine Counter Measures) program, led by the French Defence Procurement Agency DGA - Direction générale de l'armement and under the aegis of OCCAR (Organisation for Joint Armament Co-operation)🌊

Featuring #autonomous and cyber-secure drones enhanced with #AI, this pioneering achievement marks the first capability of autonomous surface drone systems in service with a navy.

This system initiates the renewal of mine warfare capability supported by the french program SLAM-F (future mine countermeasures system).

At Thales, we are proud to be leading the way in redefining maritime #mine countermeasure operations.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Wow
Reactions: 23 users

TheDrooben

Pretty Pretty Pretty Pretty Good
Bit of M&A activity in the edge NPU sector....


Happy as Larry
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users

manny100

Regular
Interesting comparison chart. BRN still outperforming the XAO all ords since 26th September'25. Well done BRN!!
Well
BRN XAO COMP 11th Feb25.png
done BRN!!
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 13 users

Boab

I wish I could paint like Vincent
Looks like "They" whoever they are has decided its time to buy again.🤞🤞
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 11 users

manny100

Regular
Article by MF US on Qualcomm.
See the link below to a quote which is part of the reason people are taking a punt 'in a new 'game changer' Edge AI tech
Qualcomm Is Seeing Strong Smartphone Demand, but Is the Stock a Buy?
"Quote below from the MF article is part of the reason why people taking a punt on ' a game changing Tec stock in the Edge industry' - BRN
  • Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you’d have $336,677!*
  • Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you’d have $43,109!*
  • Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you’d have $546,804!*"
  • DYOR
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

GStocks123

Regular
Anyone manage to source the updated top 20?
 
  • Haha
  • Thinking
Reactions: 15 users

mcm

Regular
He bought back just to sell right after… watch and see
He's a she.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
He bought back just to sell right after… watch and see
I think both Dolci and Ariel have made handsome profits trading BRN over the years. Dolci generally promoting lows to buy in, then pumping till she sells out and then rinse repeating.
Ariel mercilessly shorted the stock a few years ago and probably made good bank.
Now that the price is in the gutter they have changed their tune and relentlessly pump hoping to ride the wave back up.
Neither give a rats about the company or what it’s trying to achieve or the impact it’s success may have upon the world.
And that’s ok.
They have a purely mercantile relationship to the company.
Best served over at the cesspit that is the crapper.
Generally the contributors here tend to take a longer term and more comprehensive view whilst still of course looking for a positive outcome valuation wise.

I have come to the view that a mixture of the approaches is probably the best with separate long term and trading parcels to take advantage of both strategies.

Working towards that scenario now, but wish I had implemented it a few years back.

GLTAH
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users

7für7

Top 20

7für7

Top 20
I think both Dolci and Ariel have made handsome profits trading BRN over the years. Dolci generally promoting lows to buy in, then pumping till she sells out and then rinse repeating.
Ariel mercilessly shorted the stock a few years ago and probably made good bank.
Now that the price is in the gutter they have changed their tune and relentlessly pump hoping to ride the wave back up.
Neither give a rats about the company or what it’s trying to achieve or the impact it’s success may have upon the world.
And that’s ok.
They have a purely mercantile relationship to the company.
Best served over at the cesspit that is the crapper.
Generally the contributors here tend to take a longer term and more comprehensive view whilst still of course looking for a positive outcome valuation wise.

I have come to the view that a mixture of the approaches is probably the best with separate long term and trading parcels to take advantage of both strategies.

Working towards that scenario now, but wish I had implemented it a few years back.

GLTAH
I have no problem with how someone makes his money. My problem is when people influence others just to make a profit. While some have a plan, others have no clue and end up losing their investment. The fact that it’s women doing this doesn’t make it any better. It’s strange that the majority of people using such practices are women. Is T&J also a woman? I wouldn’t be surprised in that case. (Of course, there are amazing women like Bravo.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Goodness me! What have we here?!!!!

The below article includes quotes from Steven Meier of the Naval Research Centre.The importance of what this might mean to us can be further ascertained in light of the collaboration between the AFRL and the NRL, as is outlined in this extract from the 2023 Space Symposium..


EXTRACT

View attachment 77166







View attachment 77161


View attachment 77160




Pentagon

Power generation challenges could overshadow Stargate AI initiative​

By Courtney Albon
Saturday, Jan 25, 2025

IZIWWVTUGRXWKZSTNRYXI3TUMU.jpg
President Donald Trump and AI industry leaders and investors on Tuesday unveiled a five-year, $500 billion initiative to boost AI development in the U.S. (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP)
While the Defense Department is likely to benefit from OpenAI’s announcement this week that it would invest half a trillion dollars to build new artificial intelligence data centers around the country, Pentagon officials warned that the U.S. lacks the energy resources and computing power to support the new infrastructure — and solving that problem won’t be easy.
OpenAI announced the project, dubbed Stargate, on Tuesday, pledging an initial $100 billion — plus another $400 billion over the next five years — to build new AI infrastructure across the U.S. and create “hundreds of thousands of American jobs” in the process. Early funders include Softbank, OpenAI, Oracle and MGX — a technology investment firm based in the United Arab Emirates — and OpenAI will partner with Oracle, Microsoft, Arm and NVIDIA on technology development.


During a press conference Tuesday at the White House, President Donald Trump called the effort a “monumental undertaking” and said the White House would support the project, in part, through issuing emergency declarations, though he didn’t expand on details.
The Defense Department has an ambitious vision for using AI across a range of military missions, including data collection, intelligence analysis, campaigning and logistics. But running those tools and applications takes more computing power and space than DOD has access to.
Roy Campbell, deputy director of advanced computing in the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Research and Engineering, said Thursday that many times, bases outside of the U.S. don’t have the computing power they need to retrain new AI tools.

“In some cases, for you to be able to handle a situation a forward operating base can’t handle, you have to kick that back to [the continental United States] and use the DOD supercomputing centers that we have there,” he said during a panel at the Potomac Officers Club’s annual Research and Development Summit in McLean, Virginia.
Jeff Waksman, who’s leading an effort in the Pentagon’s Strategic Capabilities Office to develop a mobile nuclear reactor, said the strain that technologies like AI and high-power computing place on the electric grid raises questions about who should have access to data and how to mitigate the risk of blackouts.
“This is not a problem that industry or the DOD can figure out by itself. It’s about the nation’s grid as a whole,” said Waksman, who spoke on a panel with Campbell. “It’s probably the most underrated challenge of this huge $500 billion announcement.”
Waksman’s nuclear reactor program, known as Project Pele, offers one answer to that challenge: using nuclear power to source energy for AI computing.

The effort, initiated in 2019, aims to demonstrate the first-ever U.S. prototype of a portable nuclear reactor within five years. The mobile reactor, which the department estimates could deliver one to five megawatts of electrical power over a minimum three-year operating life, would support DOD’s growing energy needs by providing power to austere locations.
The Pentagon broke ground at the Project Pele test site at the Idaho National Laboratory last September and plans to begin assembling the reactor — built by BWXT Advanced Technologies — as soon as next month. The department aims to demonstrate the technology in 2026.
“It’s going to be the first generation portable nuclear reactor built anywhere in the world, outside of China,” Waksman said. “It’s very much not a paper project anymore.”
View attachment 77162 View attachment 77162

Another potential solution to the AI power problem is making processors more effective at crunching data. Steven Meier, associate director of space technology at the Naval Research Center, said his lab is exploring the use of more efficient neuromorphic processors that can be 100 times more efficient than a standard processor. Essentially, neuromorphic processors take up less space, work faster and use less energy.
“There’s huge gains to be made in terms of neuromorphic processors making AI and [machine learning] more accessible on autonomous vehicles of all shapes and sizes,” Meier said at the conference.





Here’s another recent article quoting Steven Meier from the Naval Research Centre.

In the article above, Steven noted that “There are huge gains to be made in terms of neuromorphic processors making AI and [machine learning] more accessible on autonomous vehicles of all shapes and sizes.”

In the article below, Steven discusses how Navy researchers are testing a fully autonomous satellite called AUTOSAT, designed to detect and characterize objects in space.

Given his earlier statement, it stands to reason that AUTOSAT could also benefit from neuromorphic processors.






Why the US Navy wants to build a fully autonomous satellite​

By Courtney Albon
Friday, Jan 24, 2025

I2TOYUFVBFED5F4HK74SEJGYJM.jpg
The Naval Research Laboratory has demonstrated a fully autonomous satellite, Autosat, in a lab environment and hopes to eventually test the system in orbit. (Jumpeestudio/Getty Images)
Navy researchers are testing a fully autonomous satellite designed to detect and characterize objects in space.
The system, called Autosat, is designed to task, calibrate its signals and send and receive information on its own without the need for a human operator. Steven Meier, director of space technology at the Naval Research Laboratory, said Thursday his team has demonstrated the capability in the lab.

“We’ve done a demo of this and proven out the principles and are looking for the next step,” he said during a panel at the Potomac Officers Club’s Research and Development Summit in McLean, Virginia. “We want to get funding to actually build a system along these lines and launch it.”
Autosat features an imaging payload that the lab has trained with a database of images, including airports, runways, roads and buildings. The more information the payload receives, the smarter it becomes about recognizing patterns and spotting objects.
Satellites that can detect and track objects and send intelligence to military users are in high demand from defense agencies like the Space Force and U.S. Space Command. But Meier said the true potential of Autosat is in its autonomy, allowing it to navigate without GPS, communications and ground control.

Ultimately, Meier said, the lab envisions a network of Autosat-like systems.

Space Force interest​

The Space Force is also exploring artificial intelligence and autonomy for a number of applications — from reducing the burden on operators to giving decision-makers a better understanding of threats in space on faster timelines.
Speaking in August at a National Defense Industrial Association event, the Space Force’s former top acquisition official Frank Calvelli said he expects satellites to be “significantly more autonomous” within the next 10 to 15 years. Future spacecraft, he said, will be less reliant on the antennas and ground stations that are typically early — and easy — targets of cyber attacks during a conflict.
Last November, the service awarded a contract to Colorado-based Advanced Space to conduct a feasibility study on using AI and machine learning algorithms to guide satellites and help them maneuver around space threats.

The Space Development Agency, which is building a constellation of hundreds of small satellites, views automation as fundamental to its future space architecture.
The Space Rapid Capabilities Office is working with a slew of commercial firms to incorporate AI into a more modern ground system called Rapid Resilient Command and Control. Kelly Hammett, the organization’s director, told reporters in December one of the system’s key capabilities is automated mission planning, which will allow operators to schedule contacts and maneuvers.
“You can run a variety of cases and situations, decide the one you want and then press the button and it’ll upload a mission profile,” he said at the Space Force Association’s Spacepower Conference in Orlando, Florida.




https://www.defensenews.com/space/2...-wants-to-build-a-fully-autonomous-satellite/
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 26 users

Boab

I wish I could paint like Vincent
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

HopalongPetrovski

I'm Spartacus!
I have no problem with how someone makes his money. My problem is when people influence others just to make a profit. While some have a plan, others have no clue and end up losing their investment. The fact that it’s women doing this doesn’t make it any better. It’s strange that the majority of people using such practices are women. Is T&J also a woman? I wouldn’t be surprised in that case. (Of course, there are amazing women like Bravo.)
Hi Fur.
I don’t think gender is very relevant in this context. But agree that the practice of attempted manipulation for personal gain is distasteful. t&j is quite artful in their capacity to twist words so that their meaning is almost diametrically opposite to the truth of a matter. Their propensity in this regard can be amusing but beyond that just another technical trader willing to denigrate anyone or anything in the pursuit of profit.
The crapper is full of them.
Here, they tend to be exposed and flame out fairly quickly.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 12 users

manny100

Regular
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

Anything to see here team ……… 🤔

IMG_3705.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top Bottom