DingoBorat
Slim
Okay, I'll add this..
What AI Inquirer said in his last post, that I had a problem with.
"As confirmed in our last price-sensitive announcement the SPP and the recent investor podcast, the CEO explained that they’re only now reaching the stage where they can offer the algorithm and are still building the pre-trained models, with ongoing development underway and future commercialisation to come"
I said this, after only listening to the first few minutes of the podcast..
"If you listen to just these first few minutes, you can see, that AI Inquirer's "interpretations" to put it nicely of what Sean said, are complete and utter Bullshit"
After listening to the part of the podcast, that Boab highlighted, it muddied the waters, of what was said in the first few minutes and became apparent, that AI Inquirer, wasn't being as misleading, as I had originally thought.
For saying, that what he said was "complete and utter...."
However, what he "explained" that Sean was saying, was still inaccurate and he should have "quoted" or said "he said along the lines of.." or "my interpretation of what he said is".
And not putting words into Sean's mouth.
Further discussion, with Diogenese, made me aware, that any misunderstanding of what Sean said, was more than likely unfounded.
He also said this..
"On both forums, individuals who must spend over 20 hours a week posting have become so emotionally invested or financially trapped in the stock, so they aggressively counter any dissenting views, regardless of how absurd or misleading their claims may be. For instance, recent posts have suggested that TENN’s over-the-air software updates with Mercedes and Valeo are imminent, based on the use of the term "neural network" in LinkedIn posts and claimed that we have a product lineup with 14 offerings"
I wouldn't say I'm personally "emotionally invested" in a bad way and although I'm most definitely heavily invested, I don't feel "trapped" and still want to increase my holdings.
I don't see dissenting views, "aggressively counter(ed)"??..
I personally, will vehemently defend, if I see someone posting things I consider misleading, but I wouldn't say "I'm" aggressive about it..
And it seems his dummy spit, was in relation to one of my posts to him, because I didn't respect his "authoritah" in a similar way, that FactFinder, couldn't handle criticism, of what he said.
He then gives examples, which could only really relate, to either Diogenese or FactFinder, in the first and obviously FF in the last.
Diogenese, has put forward his "hypothesis" of the first several times, but has never said such things were certain or "imminent".
I'm not sure, what FF has said about it, but I myself made a joke about FF's list on the 2nd point.
Last edited:
..
..
possibly being executed from the deep Wilde's of Southern Panama.
