BRN Discussion Ongoing

ndefries

Regular
I have been in contact with the founder of this company, check out this link...www.orbai.ai/about-us

"That would be very interesting, as we are looking for a partner in the hardware sector that is working with SNNs"

Potentially another opportunity, doors must remain open as we expand our reach, in my opinion of course...:geek:
that is great - it is creative companies like this that show how good our model is going to prove. They get a chip from us, play with it and we become part of their business model and collect $.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 24 users

uiux

Regular
View attachment 4713
this image from SiFive article is the perfect example of the 64 pack of AKIDA as an NPU that Diogenus spoke of.
My take is that Sifive are fishing for completion to AKIDA and will come back as NASA did with Brainchip as sole supplier because nobody else has one to compete

That diagram is a single Akida chip
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 17 users

davidfitz

Regular
I mean, it's none of my business, but does anyone know why Edge Impulse is promoting Brainchips partnership on their Twitter page?

Seems odd to that they come on our podcast, boasts about Neuromorphic Edge AI, which is low power alternative that takes up energy of only AAA batteries for a long period of time (hmm, now where have I heard that before? 🤔) on their social media on a daily basis, shares Brainchips partnership with other companies, and a few other social media exchanges around.

I'm struggling to see why, may be someone could help.

View attachment 4712
They are also part of the Edge AI and Vision Alliance which appears to be growing quite steadily. I have mentioned this before but you will see some familiar names especially the ones we are working with or have sold our IP to.

Overtime I expect we will have a close relationship with a majority of them.

Alliance Members​

A who's who of the industry​

The Edge AI and Vision Alliance is a collaboration to accelerate the adoption of AI and practical computer vision features in products and systems.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 17 users

Iseki

Regular
I don't consider it unreasonable to expect company updates on news worth events, not necessarily market sensitive nor in breach of NDA but keeping the market appropriately updated officially through ASX.

What are the ASX Listing Rules?

When must a listed entity disclose information to the market via the market operator?

Under Listing Rule 3.1, an entity must disclose all information concerning it that it becomes aware of from any source and of any character, if a reasonable person would expect the information to have a material effect on the price or value of its securities.
The key word is material. If a news item pumps the price by 5% and it then drops back a few days later when the news item is understood to be a $0 collaboration with no budgeted outcome, it's not material, IMHO
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 5 users

Bravo

If ARM was an arm, BRN would be its biceps💪!
Could someone please email Peter Van Der Made to inform him that there are more than 5 senses because he might want to include some of these in the next gen AKIDA 2000 and AKIDA 3000.

Screen Shot 2022-04-21 at 1.58.46 pm.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 22 users

Diogenese

Top 20
I have been in contact with the founder of this company, check out this link...www.orbai.ai/about-us

"That would be very interesting, as we are looking for a partner in the hardware sector that is working with SNNs"

Potentially another opportunity, doors must remain open as we expand our reach, in my opinion of course...:geek:

Hi Tech,

orbai has a pending patent application for the method, and one for the system architecture:

WO2019246116A1 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR UTILIZING A PARAMETER GENOME CHARACTERIZING NEURAL NETWORK CONNECTIONS AS A BUILDING BLOCK TO CONSTRUCT A NEURAL NETWORK WITH FEEDFORWARD AND FEEDBACK PATHS

A method of forming a neural network includes specifying layers of neural network neurons. A parameter genome is defined with numerical parameters characterizing connections between neural network neurons in the layers of neural network neurons, where the connections are defined from a neuron in a current layer to neurons in a set of adjacent layers, and where the parameter genome has a unique representation characterized by kilobytes of numerical parameters. Parameter genomes are combined into a connectome characterizing all connections between all neural network neurons in the connectome, where the connectome has in excess of millions of neural network neurons and billions of connections between the neural network neurons.


1650511116185.png


A method of forming a neural network includes specifying layers of neural network neurons. A parameter genome is defined with numerical parameters characterizing connections between neural network neurons in the layers of neural network neurons, where the connections are defined from a neuron in a current layer to neurons in a set of adjacent layers, and where the parameter genome has a unique representation characterized by kilobytes of numerical parameters. Parameter genomes are combined into a connectome characterizing all connections between all neural network neurons in the connectome, where the connectome has in excess of millions of neural network neurons and billions of connections between the neural network neurons.

I haven't read the whole patent, just abstracts, because I value the remnants of my sanity.

They talk of "parameter genomes" and "connectomes". My uninformed guess is that the "parameter genomes" may be somewhat equivalent to individual neuron "weights" in a SNN. The "genome" is the combination of all "parameter genomes" in the whole SNN, so the genomes could be equated to the overall model used in a real SNN, and from which the weights are derived.

Returning to Figure 2, parameter genomes are expanded into connectomes 206. More particularly, the parameter genomes are put through a set of mathematical stages to form a connectome. A connectome characterizes all connections between all neurons in the connectome of the neural network. The neural network connectomes can have on the order of thousands of connections per neuron and contain billions of neurons or more. The parameter genomes are expanded into a connectome in accordance with an algorithmic process with a deterministic mathematical model. In one embodiment, the deterministic mathematical process receives numeric parameter to generate a two-dimensional grayscale map. Multiple two-dimensional grayscale maps may then be combined to produce a final grayscale map.
...
An example is a multiply, which is a pixel-by-pixel multiplication of the two input pixels to get the output pixel, which is done for every pixel in the maps. Generation of procedural maps and combining them in mathematical operations is commonly used in many 2D and 3D drawing and modelling software programs for digital art and visual effects, but we show a novel use of them to expand parameters to maps, and compositing those maps using these operations to make a probability map to define connections from neurons in one layer to neurons in another layer.

It is an iterative design process:

The best aggregated neural network connectomes are then selected 210 and tested against design criteria 212. If the design criteria is not met (212 - No), control returns to blocks 204-212. If the design criteria is met (212 - Yes), the final neural network is deployed..
################################################################

US2019385704A1 APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR UTILIZING A PARAMETER GENOME CHARACTERIZING NEURAL NETWORK CONNECTIONS AS A BUILDING BLOCK TO CONSTRUCT A NEURAL NETWORK WITH FEEDFORWARD AND FEEDBACK PATHS

1650513864725.png




All 20 claims are subject to objection/rejection by USPTO:

https://register.epo.org/documentView?number=US.201916437838.A&documentId=1-14-US++164378380JP1+

The fact that the patent may be rejected would not, on its own, prevent orbai implementing their process. However, if it infringes earlier patents which are still in force would be a problem.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users

Yak52

Regular
With a CLOSE of AUD$1.05 on both the USA & EURO Markets last night its embarrassing to see on the ASX that BRN falling back down to 98c level after a $1.01 daily high.
What will tonights overseas markets reaction be?

The shorters are still here though they are probably the common variety not the Insto kind at this point. The 1.3 mil shorts taken out on Tuesday would seem to support this thought. A half decent 4C and the smell of crispy Shorters will be very strong!

And it would not seem totally impossible to have an Announcement with News before the 4C comes out late next week either reading the tea leaves. Shorters have become reckless perhaps? ouch!

Too much media news around Ai and BRN and collaborations for this puppy to stay so low.

The ONE thing we can rely on is the 4C will have more revenue than the last one did. That will be a positive indicator that likely will increase SP regardless of how much revenue that is.

My opinions only, DYOR.

Yak52
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 30 users

Dang Son

Regular
Hi Dang Son,

Are there any exceptions to Rule 3.1?
Would a reasonable person expect the information to have a material effect on the price or value of the entity’s securities? Is the information within one of these categories?
1. It would be a breach of law to disclose the information
2. The information concerns an incomplete proposal or negotiation
3. The information concerns matters of supposition or is insufficiently definite to warrant disclosure
4. The information is generated for internal management purposes
5. The information is a trade secret . Is the information confidential?
Would a reasonable person expect the information to be disclosed in the circumstances?
Has ASX advised that in its opinion the information is no longer confidential?
If No , The information must be disclosed immediately under Listing Rule 3.1

~Considering the news articles in question are mutually agreed media releases concerning product development partnerships, they are most likely reasonable to be expected for ASX disclosure 🤨
The company is happy to inform of its progress achievements via global media but not on the appropriate official ASX chanel .
There seems to me to be a disconnect with disclosure logic between Brainchip Inc CA and the ASX market.
Brainchip has an ASX compliance advisor based in Sydney whose advice values possible don't align with shareholder interests. IMO
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Fire
Reactions: 11 users

Diogenese

Top 20
Would a reasonable person expect the information to have a material effect on the price or value of the entity’s securities? Is the information within one of these categories?
1. It would be a breach of law to disclose the information
2. The information concerns an incomplete proposal or negotiation
3. The information concerns matters of supposition or is insufficiently definite to warrant disclosure
4. The information is generated for internal management purposes
5. The information is a trade secret . Is the information confidential?
Would a reasonable person expect the information to be disclosed in the circumstances?
Has ASX advised that in its opinion the information is no longer confidential?
If No , The information must be disclosed immediately under Listing Rule 3.1

~Considering the news articles in question are mutually agreed media releases concerning product development partnerships, they are most likely reasonable to be expected for ASX disclosure 🤨
The company is happy to inform of its progress achievements via global media but not on the appropriate official ASX chanel .
There seems to me to be a disconnect with disclosure logic between Brainchip Inc CA and the ASX market.
Brainchip has an ASX compliance advisor based in Sydney whose advice values possible don't align with shareholder interests. IMO
Thanks Dang Son,

I'm sure no BrainChip employees would be working counter to shareholder interests, even those in nefarious places like Sydney. Perhaps the ASX is the final arbiter on what gets to be an ASX announcement.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Haha
Reactions: 11 users

Fox151

Regular
With a CLOSE of AUD$1.05 on both the USA & EURO Markets last night its embarrassing to see on the ASX that BRN falling back down to 98c level after a $1.01 daily high.
What will tonights overseas markets reaction be?

The shorters are still here though they are probably the common variety not the Insto kind at this point. The 1.3 mil shorts taken out on Tuesday would seem to support this thought. A half decent 4C and the smell of crispy Shorters will be very strong!

And it would not seem totally impossible to have an Announcement with News before the 4C comes out late next week either reading the tea leaves. Shorters have become reckless perhaps? ouch!

Too much media news around Ai and BRN and collaborations for this puppy to stay so low.

The ONE thing we can rely on is the 4C will have more revenue than the last one did. That will be a positive indicator that likely will increase SP regardless of how much revenue that is.

My opinions only, DYOR.

Yak52
Wouldn't you be filthy being a shorter if the next announcement bounces it back to $2.40...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 14 users
With a CLOSE of AUD$1.05 on both the USA & EURO Markets last night its embarrassing to see on the ASX that BRN falling back down to 98c level after a $1.01 daily high.
What will tonights overseas markets reaction be?

The shorters are still here though they are probably the common variety not the Insto kind at this point. The 1.3 mil shorts taken out on Tuesday would seem to support this thought. A half decent 4C and the smell of crispy Shorters will be very strong!

And it would not seem totally impossible to have an Announcement with News before the 4C comes out late next week either reading the tea leaves. Shorters have become reckless perhaps? ouch!

Too much media news around Ai and BRN and collaborations for this puppy to stay so low.

The ONE thing we can rely on is the 4C will have more revenue than the last one did. That will be a positive indicator that likely will increase SP regardless of how much revenue that is.

My opinions only, DYOR.

Yak52
They Pull Me Back In Al Pacino GIF by The Godfather
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 10 users

Dang Son

Regular
That diagram is a single Akida chip
Wow thanks uiux, that make Dio's vision of a 64 gang AKIDA that much more impressive.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 5 users

VictorG

Member
Sleep tight shorters, once you lose all your money, you can get a job as WANCA's
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 26 users

wilzy123

Founding Member
With a CLOSE of AUD$1.05 on both the USA & EURO Markets last night its embarrassing to see on the ASX that BRN falling back down to 98c level after a $1.01 daily high.
What will tonights overseas markets reaction be?

The shorters are still here though they are probably the common variety not the Insto kind at this point. The 1.3 mil shorts taken out on Tuesday would seem to support this thought. A half decent 4C and the smell of crispy Shorters will be very strong!

And it would not seem totally impossible to have an Announcement with News before the 4C comes out late next week either reading the tea leaves. Shorters have become reckless perhaps? ouch!

Too much media news around Ai and BRN and collaborations for this puppy to stay so low.

The ONE thing we can rely on is the 4C will have more revenue than the last one did. That will be a positive indicator that likely will increase SP regardless of how much revenue that is.

My opinions only, DYOR.

Yak52
1650522690068.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 27 users
Would a reasonable person expect the information to have a material effect on the price or value of the entity’s securities? Is the information within one of these categories?
1. It would be a breach of law to disclose the information
2. The information concerns an incomplete proposal or negotiation
3. The information concerns matters of supposition or is insufficiently definite to warrant disclosure
4. The information is generated for internal management purposes
5. The information is a trade secret . Is the information confidential?
Would a reasonable person expect the information to be disclosed in the circumstances?
Has ASX advised that in its opinion the information is no longer confidential?
If No , The information must be disclosed immediately under Listing Rule 3.1

~Considering the news articles in question are mutually agreed media releases concerning product development partnerships, they are most likely reasonable to be expected for ASX disclosure 🤨
The company is happy to inform of its progress achievements via global media but not on the appropriate official ASX chanel .
There seems to me to be a disconnect with disclosure logic between Brainchip Inc CA and the ASX market.
Brainchip has an ASX compliance advisor based in Sydney whose advice values possible don't align with shareholder interests. IMO
Hi Dang Son and everyone else,

I intend to now put this question to bed once and for all.

Many here will remember an Australian company GetSwift and the games it tried to play to 'ramp' its share price which led to it delisting on the ASX and I believe moving to Canada.

In short it was committing a fraud on its shareholders and the market by fabricating and exaggerating the extent of an engagement that it claimed to have achieved. It was discovered and successful prosecutions launched.

In consequence of this case the ASX revised completely its approach to 'ramping' and how it deals with companies it considers are engaged in this practice. The prosecution of the female tech founder and her subsequent imprisonment in the USA has placed even greater focus at the ASX on technology companies particularly those like Brainchip which has revolutionary technology that is not understood by most and which organisations like the Australian Financial Review, Motley Fool and ***************** have been calling out for being driven by retail to unstainable levels with unproven technology the 'WANCA' effect in other words.

Though I am a retired lawyer the very fact I am retired means I cannot provide legal advice so I will reproduce advice from actual practising Lawyers to their clients regarding this issue:

Thinking | 9 June 2021

ASX cracks down on ‘ramping announcements’

By Michelle Eastwell and Vanessa Murphy
The use of ‘ramping announcements’ has been on ASX’s radar for some time now. Listed companies should carefully consider the content of and language used in market announcements, following ASX’s latest update to Guidance Note 8, which came into effect on 5 June 2021.
As the name suggests, a ‘ramping announcement’ is made with a view to ‘ramping up’ the price of securities and can take a variety of forms. Examples include announcements that contain no new material information or substance but are issued under the guise of ‘business updates’ or on the back of strong market sentiment in a sector. A quick series of announcements intended to pique investor interest but which aren’t particularly material can also be ‘ramping announcements’.
‘Ramping announcements’ can also take the form of an announcement that an entity has entered into what appears to be a material contract but with very limited information disclosed to actually assess the materiality of the contract and its impact on the price or value of the entity’s securities. This has been a particular area of focus for ASX.
Examples of ‘ramping announcements’ identified by ASX include:

  • announcing a contract with a major customer to leverage off the customer’s reputation, without properly quantifying the benefit to the entity. In one instance, this included disclosure of a ‘material commercial agreement with a leading financial entity’ under which the entity was to receive less than $1,000;
  • announcing a contract when in fact it is only a non-binding heads of agreement or a framework agreement that only establishes contractual arrangements that will apply to future orders (if any are made);
  • projecting substantial revenues, without reasonable grounds; and
  • describing a contract as ‘material’ when clearly it is not.
ASX has previously observed instances of ‘ramping announcements’ being made just prior to or after a capital raising, presumably with the intent of boosting the raising price or the post raise trading price or following the appointment of advisors where they are remunerated in securities.
If ASX suspects a ‘ramping announcement’ has been made, it will carefully consider whether to suspend trading and issue a query letter to the entity seeking further information about the announcement. In particular, ASX may ask the entity to advise what information was market sensitive, and, if not market sensitive, to explain the purpose of the announcement, and, if the announcement includes any projections or forward looking statements, the reasonable grounds on which those statements are based. This also aligns with ASX’s recent monitoring activities in relation to the disclosure of material contracts, which have involved revisiting historical announcements to assess whether matters previously disclosed are consistent with, and do not overstate, the true position reached by the listed company in relation to the relevant contract or transaction.
Where an announcement relates to a contract, ASX may ask for a copy of the contract (not for release to market) in order to verify compliance with disclosure obligations.
ASX may also require corrective disclosure to be made where information in a ‘ramping announcement’ was not material or was incomplete or misleading, advising of these matters and stating that investors should not make investment decisions based on the announcement. This is unlikely to be well received by the market.
With the continued focus by ASX on ‘ramping announcements’, listed companies should ensure they turn their minds to the appropriateness of announcements that do not clearly contain price sensitive information. While there will often be a range of legitimate reasons for making such announcements, careful consideration should be given to the language used, the timing and proximity to other announcements and the substance of the announcement.
For further information regarding disclosure obligations, please contact our team.


So having read this advice and having communicated with Tony Dawe I can say that Brainchip being made aware in discussions with the ASX that they are specifically watching technology stocks and that they will come down very hard on what they consider to be 'ramping’’. Brainchip decided to take the approach that it will only release on the ASX solid gold price sensitive announcements with real income presently attaching. Potential will not be enough no matter how much it appears to be.

The above advice explains the wisdom of taking this approach as even a marked 'non price sensitive' update such as we have formed a partnership with SiFive for example could be called out as ‘ramping’ by the ASX.

Brainchip has taken the view that as a result of all of the attacks that it suffered and continues to suffer, its Australian and International reputation, at this critical point in its success trajectory would be significantly affected even by an enquiry from the ASX regarding an allegation to the effect that it was engaging in 'ramping.

Brainchip and those that control the levers clearly know they do not need to 'ramp' they are on the road to success and even though some short term pain might be encountered as a result of this approach, the company's future and its potential customer engagements are far too important to have their reputation tarnished by a 'ramping' allegation even if later found not to be proven.

I would now suggest that if you have not listened to the Rob Lincourt of DELL Technologies podcast you take the time to do so because he talks about the need for his industry which is Brainchip's industry to regain trust because of the errors that have occurred in the past with artificial intelligence and the general suspicion that exists across the market when Ai is mentioned.

The need for explainable Ai which I am sure you have read about and for trust in the automotive sector to gain the approval of Governments and politicians for autonomous driving and supporting legislation, requires Brainchip to have a squeaky clean reputation as any scandal could cause a potential partner to look elsewhere even if in doing so they give up the opportunity to be using the best technology.

So we have lots of things to thank the corrupt end of the share market for and this is but one more thing but in the end because we have the right people running the company we will come out on top in my opinion. By being ultra careful no mistakes or missteps can occur.

Please therefore in your dealings with Brainchip try to be understanding as to the tightrope they are walking with the absolute best interests of the company and shareholders always at the forefront of their thinking.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 96 users
Hi Dang Son and everyone else,

I intend to now put this question to bed once and for all.

Many here will remember an Australian company GetSwift and the games it tried to play to 'ramp' its share price which led to it delisting on the ASX and I believe moving to Canada.

In short it was committing a fraud on its shareholders and the market by fabricating and exaggerating the extent of an engagement that it claimed to have achieved. It was discovered and successful prosecutions launched.

In consequence of this case the ASX revised completely its approach to 'ramping' and how it deals with companies it considers is engaged in this practice. The prosecution of the female tech founder and her subsequent imprisonment in the USA has placed even greater focus at the ASX on technology companies particularly those like Brainchip which has revolutionary technology that is not understood by most and which organisations like the Australian Financial Review, Motley Fool and ***************** have been calling out for being driven by retail to unstainable levels with unproven technology the 'WANCA' effect in other words.

Though I am a retired lawyer the very fact I am retired means I cannot provide legal advice so I will reproduce advice from actual practising Lawyers to their clients regarding this issue:

Thinking | 9 June 2021

ASX cracks down on ‘ramping announcements’

By Michelle Eastwell and Vanessa Murphy
The use of ‘ramping announcements’ has been on ASX’s radar for some time now. Listed companies should carefully consider the content of and language used in market announcements, following ASX’s latest update to Guidance Note 8, which came into effect on 5 June 2021.
As the name suggests, a ‘ramping announcement’ is made with a view to ‘ramping up’ the price of securities and can take a variety of forms. Examples include announcements that contain no new material information or substance but are issued under the guise of ‘business updates’ or on the back of strong market sentiment in a sector. A quick series of announcements intended to pique investor interest but which aren’t particularly material can also be ‘ramping announcements’.
‘Ramping announcements’ can also take the form of an announcement that an entity has entered into what appears to be a material contract but with very limited information disclosed to actually assess the materiality of the contract and its impact on the price or value of the entity’s securities. This has been a particular area of focus for ASX.
Examples of ‘ramping announcements’ identified by ASX include:

  • announcing a contract with a major customer to leverage off the customer’s reputation, without properly quantifying the benefit to the entity. In one instance, this included disclosure of a ‘material commercial agreement with a leading financial entity’ under which the entity was to receive less than $1,000;
  • announcing a contract when in fact it is only a non-binding heads of agreement or a framework agreement that only establishes contractual arrangements that will apply to future orders (if any are made);
  • projecting substantial revenues, without reasonable grounds; and
  • describing a contract as ‘material’ when clearly it is not.
ASX has previously observed instances of ‘ramping announcements’ being made just prior to or after a capital raising, presumably with the intent of boosting the raising price or the post raise trading price or following the appointment of advisors where they are remunerated in securities.
If ASX suspects a ‘ramping announcement’ has been made, it will carefully consider whether to suspend trading and issue a query letter to the entity seeking further information about the announcement. In particular, ASX may ask the entity to advise what information was market sensitive, and, if not market sensitive, to explain the purpose of the announcement, and, if the announcement includes any projections or forward looking statements, the reasonable grounds on which those statements are based. This also aligns with ASX’s recent monitoring activities in relation to the disclosure of material contracts, which have involved revisiting historical announcements to assess whether matters previously disclosed are consistent with, and do not overstate, the true position reached by the listed company in relation to the relevant contract or transaction.
Where an announcement relates to a contract, ASX may ask for a copy of the contract (not for release to market) in order to verify compliance with disclosure obligations.
ASX may also require corrective disclosure to be made where information in a ‘ramping announcement’ was not material or was incomplete or misleading, advising of these matters and stating that investors should not make investment decisions based on the announcement. This is unlikely to be well received by the market.
With the continued focus by ASX on ‘ramping announcements’, listed companies should ensure they turn their minds to the appropriateness of announcements that do not clearly contain price sensitive information. While there will often be a range of legitimate reasons for making such announcements, careful consideration should be given to the language used, the timing and proximity to other announcements and the substance of the announcement.
For further information regarding disclosure obligations, please contact our team.


So having read this advice and communicated with Tony Dawe I can say that Brainchip having been made aware in discussions with the ASX that they are specifically watching technology stocks and they will come down very hard on what they consider to be 'ramping'. As a result Brainchip has taken the approach that it will only release on the ASX solid gold price sensitive announcements with real income presently attaching potential will not be enough.

The above advice explains the wisdom of taking this approach as even a marked 'non price sensitive' update such as we have formed a partnership with SiFive for example could be called out as ramping by the ASX.

Brainchip has taken the view that as a result of all of the attacks that it suffered and continues to suffer its Australian and International reputation at this critical point in its success trajectory would be significantly affected even by an enquiry from the ASX regarding an allegation to the effect that it was engaging in 'ramping.

Brainchip and those that control the levers clearly know they do not need to 'ramp' they are on the road to success and even though some short term pain might be encountered as a result of this approach, the company's future and its potential customer engagements are far too important to have their reputation tarnished by a 'ramping' allegation even if later found not to be proven.

I would now suggest that if you have not listened to the Rob Lincourt of DELL Technologies podcast you take the time to do so because he talks about the need for his industry which is Brainchip's industry to regain trust because of the errors that have occurred in the past with artificial intelligence and the general suspicion that exists across the market when Ai is mentioned.

The need for explainable Ai which I am sure you have read about and for trust in the automotive sector to gain the approval of Governments and politicians for autonomous driving approvals and supporting legislation requires Brainchip to have a squeaky clean reputation as any scandal could cause a potential partner to look elsewhere even if in doing so they give up the opportunity to be using the best technology.

So we have lots of things to thank the corrupt end of the share market for and this is but one more thing but in the end because we have the right people running the company we will come out on top in my opinion. By being ultra careful no mistakes or missteps can occur.

Please therefore in your dealings with Brainchip try to be understanding as to the tightrope they are walking with the absolute best interests of the company and shareholders always at the forefront of their thinking.

My opinion only DYOR
FF

AKIDA BALLISTA
Thanks very much for that information FF. It makes complete sense.

There are so many wonderful posters on here that contribute to the 1000 eyes being such a success!

Whether it be computing/AI information, funny green baby gifs or a beer photograph it’s great to be part of this journey with you all!

The most important aspect of this whole financial adventure is Brainchip of course and I am very happy with how they are managing everything; which would be no easy task. A small Australian company is revolutionising an entire industry! How good is that!

May it end in riches for everyone!

:)
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 40 users

Dallas

Regular
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users

Newk R

Regular
Could someone please email Peter Van Der Made to inform him that there are more than 5 senses because he might want to include some of these in the next gen AKIDA 2000 and AKIDA 3000.

View attachment 4720
Fiddy Sense

That's how much my first schooner cost!!!!!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 11 users
S

Straw

Guest
Angry Chicken GIF by happydog
bot, bot, bot, bot, bot, bokbot!
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 15 users
Top Bottom