BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
wilzy123
Founding Member
SP went up because of our logo used in the Intel Foundry presentation. Since then nothing happened, hence the SP when back to
I reckon you and @Iseki are the kinda dudes who count their money every day.
Sounds miserable. I am sorry you have to suffer like this.
No amount of denying it and no amount of motley fool articles you write will compensate for this unhealthy lifestyle.
Oh well.....
What's funny is people like you assuming disgruntled shareholders like us are from Motley Fool.
Oh well.....
wilzy123
Founding Member
"disgruntled shareholders"
LMAO...
Keep selling your cheap narrative and keep counting your money every day.
Good luck
wilzy123
Founding Member
ROFL...LMAO...
Keep pretending all is fine, but deep inside we know you are hurting every day.
Good luck
Speaking for me now?
There is no end to your misery.
Stop clogging this forum up with your insecurities.
rgupta
Regular
Philipp Schmid on LinkedIn: Yesterday Apple strongly advocated for on-device AI with Apple… | 57 comments
Yesterday Apple strongly advocated for on-device AI with Apple Intelligence! Today, we know they will run ~3B LLM on device (Mac, iPhone, iPad) using… | 57 comments on LinkedIn
On device LLM models.
I assume it is good for brainchip whether we are involved with Apple or not.
Future looks very attractive.
Dyor
At the AGM it was clear that engagements are getting close to decision time.
If there are none by the next AGM then yes there will be changes probably big changes.
It's a bit early to start screaming sack the board. We have just had TENNS and GEN 2
Once Edge growth is upon us the value of our Patent portfolio alone will likely be many multiples of the current SP.
So it's a bit premature to get the sads.
Stop reporting my posts.
It shows your insecurities.
I also wrote about ot recently but some people are not interested in facts communicated by the CEO. They are only interested and focused in negative things and fear and Self-spun doomsday scenarios and thought processes. These are the ones who would probably scream "WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE" at the slightest event and run out of the room whimpering, only to be caught outside and told to pull themselves together!
Okay, I'm getting too worked up again, sorry.
DingoBorat
Slim
There was extremely strong demand at the time, as DK said, due to the Intel Foundry convention and the publicity that gave us.
There is always manipulation, but strong volume and demand is "harder" to fake (though Market Movers can still encourage it).
The value of something in this World, is purely based on what people are prepared to pay for it.
Any other factors, are pretty much irrelevant.
People are currently paying AUD$102,166.91 for a Bitcoin, something that will never produce an income and you cannot see or hold.
It's value is based purely on the "Greater Fool" theory, in my opinion.
(sorry all you crypto lovers
).Share spikes and dips, are also like this.
A fool to sell so low and a fool to buy so high.
The Intel exposure (as well as the Mercedes reveal) were just tastes, of what demand can do, for the shares in our Company.
This is the "joy" of being on the speculative side of Town.
When BrainChip lands a significant IP deal, the "dream" will begin it's crystallization into reality and the share price will move 4 or 5 times it's current value.
Future success, will begin to be baked into the share price.
Manipulation will continue, but at higher levels.
Ultimately, as we all know, BrainChip must prove the value of it's IP in the Marketplace.
Once this happens though, it will be very hard, to place a value, on a hot commodity.
Right now, we are in no man's land.
Last edited:
Tothemoon24
Top 20
Brainchip hiring , 11 applications in 2hrs
Check out this job at BrainChip :
https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/3949257660
Check out this job at BrainChip :
https://www.linkedin.com/jobs/view/3949257660
Frangipani
Regular
“Deployment on a neuromorphic chip” - voilà!
Your argument is not convincing: the singular - “neuromorphic chip” - can simply refer to a specific type of neuromorphic hardware (such as BrainChip’s Akida or Intel’s Loihi) and does not necessarily tell you anything about the actual number of individual chips / PCIe boards / dev kits purchased.
Steven Peters, the former Mercedes Head of AI Research (2016-2022), who oversaw the Vision EQXX concept car project before returning to the world of academia full-time (at TU Darmstadt), used the singular that way when describing in a German podcast how his team had utilised Akida - I am pretty sure the Mercedes-Benz AI Research department did not only purchase a single AKD1000 device (despite the region’s stereotypical Swabian stinginess):
And here is how other companies/universities/research institutes mention neuromorphic hardware in their job descriptions, often naming the specific neuromorphic hardware the job applicant will be working with - the AVL one might actually hint at Akida 2.0 with its “port model to run on neuromorphic computing system (or simulator)”:
If Mercedes had meanwhile already decided on BrainChip as their exclusive neuromorphic partner, why didn’t the job description simply read “deployment on Akida” or “the Akida neuromorphic platform” instead of “neuromorphic chips”?
That’s not true.
Did you stop reading my post after the first sentence?
I based my post’s argument on four observations - how about rebutting them factually rather than belittling me?!
I never said it was a fact that Mercedes hadn’t yet made a decision - I made it clear it is my opinion, based on several observations. We may, however, end up never finding out whether this was really the case.
In fact, we will possibly only ever find out, if Mercedes were to pick another neuromorphic partner, which is obviously not the outcome I wish for. But does that mean I should ignore the evidence that in my eyes is pointing to one of those cases that Sean Hehir alluded to in his speech at the AGM, where BrainChip competes with one or two other vendors for a final selection?
Oh, I am very patient - as I’ve said before, I believe most of us BRN shareholders have been massively underestimating the time it takes to get disruptive technology implemented into products.
Especially in the automotive industry, where - at least in Europe - ISO certification is required before carmakers can transition novel parts from a concept car to mass production. I do not believe that Akida (or any other neuromorphic hardware) has yet been implemented in Mercedes vehicles that are already being sold on the market.
Earlier this year, Magnus Östberg reminded everyone that automotive-grade chips are essential for implementing neuromorphic technology into mass market cars. I believe whoever achieves this, would readily market their success as a “world’s first”.
Taking another stab at me here, I see.
Well, for the record: I am not.
My post related to a company we’ve known to be engaged with, and as much as we hope the collaboration will go on and bear fruit in the form of the revenue we are all waiting for, we just don’t know. And quite possibly not even our CEO and CTO do at this point in time.
I posted yet another puzzle piece in the mystery shrouded around the radio silence regarding the collaboration between BRN and MB, a new piece of information which I found rather telling, so why are you insinuating I posted merely for the sake of posting?
It seems, you, however, are posting for the sake of criticising me?
Otherwise please explain why you claimed my conclusions are purportedly “based on nothing” and why you only addressed one of the points I made (albeit unconvincingly).
Oh and by the way, the Mercedes-Benz job description was referring to “new chip technologies”, which I would take to be relating to neuromorphic hardware rather than software:
Do you have a link?
Tothemoon24
Top 20
In May 2024, industry professionals congregated in Detroit to attend InCabin USA. The event addressed key safety concerns in the automotive industry and explored the latest solutions to help mitigate traffic fatalities.
A longstanding bias in passive safety systems is a pressing issue in the design of automotive vehicles, with features such as seatbelts and airbags typically tested and designed for an ‘average’ adult male. These systems are thus less effective for those who do not fit this mold, including women, children and elderly occupants. As a result, a ‘one-size fits all’ approach creates a lack of equity in safety, with passengers who differ from the ‘standard’ facing a greater likelihood of injury when involved in an accident.
During InCabin, Patrick Laufer, Development Engineer at IAV GmbH, presented several factors that can contribute towards the risk of injuries. For example, people with a high BMI are more prone to neck injuries and damage to extremities, while people with a higher seating position are more likely to experience head injuries.
To address these risks, Laufer highlighted the value of Driver/ Occupant Monitoring Systems (DMS/ OMS) which can detect the body pose, head pose, age, gender, weight and height of occupants within a car. In doing so, their profile can be determined and passive safety features can be adapted to best suit their metrics. Specifically, this technology uses occupant classification to match drivers and passengers to corresponding test dummies and apply the safety systems that have proven to be most effective for their stance.
However, in order to do so accurately, sophisticated solutions are required. This technology surpasses the capabilities of many in-cabin driver monitoring systems (DMS), which are primarily being rolled out to detect impairments such as drowsiness or distraction.
A Consolidated Solution
To effectively integrate adaptive restraint systems into new vehicles, Fabian Windbacher, Lead Deep Learning Engineer, presented emotion3D’s goal of creating a robust single-camera solution for all in-cabin applications. Alongside meeting short-term mandates for driver monitoring, this solution looks ahead to upcoming regulations relating to adaptive restraints.To capture all occupants, in-cabin solutions need a wider field of view than those focused on the driver. Windbacher noted that currently, a multi-camera solution is a functional way of achieving this; however, this leads to greater costs.
emotion3D therefore aims to offer a single-camera solution that can simultaneously capture multiple features. In doing so, it can provide a more cost-effective and scalable solution for enhancing safety and meeting future regulatory demands.
To address this need, the company showcased its 1-megapixel high field-of-view (FoV) Driver and Occupant Monitoring System (DOMS) at InCabin, which combines active safety, passive safety, and user experience features.
emotion3D at InCabin USA
© emotion3D
In line with the vision for observing more than just the driver, Patrice Roulet-Fontani, VP Technology & Co-Founder at ImmerVision, presented ImmerVision’s wide-angle camera designs that can capture the whole cabin with a single lens.
Alongside providing a wider field of view, this technology stacks optical elements to magnify the driver’s face and ensure high resolution of the eyes to optimise the accuracy of driver monitoring.
In doing so, the solution can simultaneously meet the needs of both driver and occupant monitoring.
Depth Sensing
In addition to capturing more of the cabin, sensors that inform passive safety systems also need to provide more data than DMS, including depth data. This allows the systems to offer an exact view of the position of the occupants inside the cabin in safety-critical cases, such as for informing the precise, effective deployment of an airbag depending on the occupant’s profile and position.At InCabin, Henrik Lind, Chief Research Officer at Smart Eye highlighted that this function surpasses the abilities of traditional infrared illumination, which captures a two-dimensional image for driver monitoring.
Instead, Smart Eye’s technology combines 2D images with depth-sensing technologies, such as indirect Time of Flight (iToF) and structured light, to create accurate 3D representations of the vehicle’s interior. This enables precise measurement of the distances between people, objects and other surfaces within the cabin. As a result, adaptive systems can customise key safety measures for each occupant, such as airbag deployment.
The InCabin USA exhibition
© Sense Media
To optimise these capabilities, Bahman Hadji, Segment Lead at onsemi highlighted the need to smartly deploy a combination of sensing technologies, integrating imaging and depth output.
For example, onsemi’s technology employs radar and iToF sensors for depth sensing and presence detection. Here, radar detects the presence of occupants while iToF provides precise location and movement data.
This combination provides a comprehensive view of the cabin and ensures that all safety measures are accurately informed by real-time data.
The use of both technologies provides greater reliability and accuracy, as each system can validate and complement the data from the other. This is crucial for critical safety applications, where accuracy is paramount.
With these developments, InCabin USA highlighted significant advancements in automotive safety, addressing the need for more equitable and adaptive passive safety systems. By providing consolidated and integrated sensing technologies, key players in the field are working to provide real-time, personalised safety measures in a functional and cost-effective manner. This will ultimately help reduce fatalities and serious injuries caused by traffic accidents.
The largest company by market capitalization in our sector is Atlassian at $42 billion. I'd like to think that that will be a modest sum when BRN does achieve its potential.
I also like to think that BHP will need to get used to being number 2.
... where the hell are all the sheep?
I also like to think that BHP will need to get used to being number 2.
... where the hell are all the sheep?
Frangipani
Regular
It seems to be the last paragraph of this article on the BrainChip website…
NEUROMORPHIC CHIP MAKER TAKES AIM AT THE EDGE
NEUROMORPHIC CHIP MAKER TAKES AIM AT THE EDGE January 30, 2020
brainchip.com
…originally published on The Next Platform on Jan 30, 2020:
Neuromorphic Chip Maker Takes Aim At The Edge
Neuromorphic computing has garnered a lot of attention over the past few years, largely driven by its potential to deliver low-power artificial
www.nextplatform.com
Jesus, Im sorry
It’s just a phrase i guess! We don't have to relate everything to the company "Apple." If someone writes Apple… He could just as well have written, "who will open Pandora's box" or “who stole my apple from the box in wich I had my raspberry as well” etc. It doesn't mean anything.
Similar threads
