Here is a good example of what Brainchip is missing.. Good PR. I thought the last question at the AMG was the best question there as it eluded to our poor PR. Brainchip only have about 13K of followers when we should have 100'sK of followers given we are suppose to be a world leader in our field. Also having a small amateur looking stand at trade shows etc. I believe our management need to urgently address this situation and start getting a PR agency on the job so we get onto Business channels and business journals etc. The CEO having a yearly interview with a small Australian Stock Analyst company is not going to cut it. He should be having interviews with the likes of Bloomberg channel and others like that... More impressive professional trade show stands and not a table with creased tabletop and a few PC like items demo'ing. Promoting our leading technology to the masses and how we can help improve the world and humanity. Maybe Management have it in mind and are awaiting till we have a couple more contracts.. If we want to be a big professional company then we need to think and act like one... I sure hope we will very soon.Article published 15 hours ago.
Chinese Chip Ignites Global Neuromorphic Computing Competition
Environmental monitoring could also benefit from Darwin3. Smart sensors using Darwin3 could analyze environmental data in real-time, providing immediate insights into climate conditions and helping us better manage natural resources.
by SLG Syndication
May 27, 2024
2 mins read
[ Illustration: The China Academy]![]()
A typical computer chip, such as one found in a personal desktop for non-professional use, consumes around 100 watts of power. AI, on the other hand, requires significantly more energy. It is estimated that ChatGPT would consume approximately 300 watts per second to answer a single question. In contrast, the human brain is much more energy-efficient, requiring only around 10 watts of power, comparable to that of a lightbulb. This exceptional energy efficiency is one of the reasons why scientists are interested in modeling the next generation of microchips after the human brain.
In the bustling tech landscape of Hangzhou, China, a team of researchers at Zhejiang University has made a significant leap in the world of neuromorphic computing with the development of their latest innovation, the Darwin3 chip. This groundbreaking piece of technology promises to transform how we simulate brain activity, paving the way for advancements in artificial intelligence, robotics, and beyond.
Neuromorphic chips are designed to emulate the architecture and functioning of the human brain. Unlike traditional computers that process information in a linear, step-by-step manner, these chips operate more like our brains, processing multiple streams of information simultaneously and adapting to new data in real-time.
The Darwin3 chip is a marvel of modern engineering, specifically designed to work with Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs). SNNs are a type of artificial neural network that mimics the way neurons and synapses in the human brain communicate. While conventional neural networks use continuous signals to process information, SNNs use discrete spikes, much like the bursts of electrical impulses that our neurons emit.
Test environment. (a) The test chip and system board. (b) Application development process.![]()
One of the standout features of Darwin3 is its flexibility in simulating various types of neurons. Just as an orchestra can produce a wide range of sounds by utilizing different instruments, Darwin3 can emulate different neuron models to suit a variety of tasks, from basic pattern recognition to complex decision-making processes.
To achieve this goal, Darwin3’s key innovations is its domain-specific instruction set architecture (ISA). This custom-designed set of instructions allows the chip to efficiently describe diverse neuron models and learning rules, including the integrate-and-fire (LIF) model, Izhikevich model, and Spike-Timing-Dependent Plasticity (STDP). This versatility enables Darwin3 to tackle a wide range of computational tasks, making it a highly adaptable tool for AI development.
Another significant breakthrough is Darwin3’s efficient memory usage. Neuromorphic computing faces the challenge of managing vast amounts of data involved in simulating neuronal connections. Darwin3 overcomes this hurdle with an innovative compression mechanism that dramatically reduces memory usage. Imagine shrinking a massive library of books into a single, compact e-reader without losing any content—this is akin to what Darwin3 achieves with synaptic connections.
Perhaps the most exciting feature of Darwin3 is its on-chip learning capability. This allows the chip to learn and adapt in real-time, much like how humans learn from experience. Darwin3 can modify its behavior based on new information, leading to smarter and more autonomous systems.
The implications of Darwin3’s technology are far-reaching and transformative. In healthcare, prosthetic limbs powered by Darwin3 could learn and adapt to a user’s movements, offering a more intuitive and natural experience. This could significantly enhance the quality of life for amputees.
In robotics, robots equipped with Darwin3 could navigate complex environments with greater ease and efficiency, similar to how humans learn to maneuver through crowded spaces. This capability could revolutionize industries from manufacturing to space exploration.
Environmental monitoring could also benefit from Darwin3. Smart sensors using Darwin3 could analyze environmental data in real-time, providing immediate insights into climate conditions and helping us better manage natural resources.
The Darwin3 chip represents a monumental step forward in neuromorphic computing, bringing us closer to creating machines that can think and learn in ways previously thought impossible. As this technology continues to evolve, we anticipate a future where intelligent systems seamlessly integrate into our daily lives, enhancing everything from medical care to environmental conservation. The research is recently published in the journal National Science Review.
Source: China Academy
7für7 said:
Mate….I know people whose grandparents also run a business in which they specialized. That doesn't mean they ( the grandchildren) automatically know everything. The media landscape is constantly changing. Camera work, which is meant to evoke a certain drama, is also evolving. Imagine if films were still shot the same way they were in your grandparents' time… I come from this field as well, so relax… my great-great-great-grandparents were already doing theater, and my ancestors invented drama and comedy…so!?
Reply,
Respect is urnt not given
I have taken a few days off as it’s in my blood to get very angry at disrespectful people like yourself 7fur7.
As you started all this....I’ll finish it with this note,
I have spent all my whole life in TV and Film Production being 63 years now with my first job at 16 you do maths, my comment of ...... it’s in my blood ...you took out of context and proceeded to be a smart arse and try and insult me with your above rambling comments, accusing me of being the grandkid running off his grandparents not knowing what I am talking about.
You don’t have a clue but chose to take the path of insult.
I have attached the standard video presentations formats professional producers use and the reasons why it is the standard requirements to engage with the audience in a professional manner , your cut and paste of documentaries / non fiction films that you quickly put up without any reason but IMO to be a smart arse and which you think is correct are just plan wrong and irrelevant for this format.
By the way I have sent this on to the stock broker video team so they take more care next time around when Sean is trying to find which camera to look at, very unprofessional and relevant to me as a shareholder that it needs attention.
My apologies to everyone for this continued discussion, however this is relevant and needs to be cleared up.
I won’t except disrespect from someone whom thinks he knows everything and tries to belittle people to make himself look good imo.
I have said my peace now and that’s all I have to say moving forward.
See below.
I hear you. It almost seems like management are deliberately "hiding their light under a bushel". Perhaps at the behest of a tech major whilst they get a head start? Or maybe the incoming CMO will address the issue and get us the media and public attention we deserve, starting with Australia. I get that the majors and most of the potential customers are overseas but BRN is an Australian public company that should be WAY better represented to the investment community in its "home". I have long held the view that management regard the fact that we are an Oz company as an annoyance and would much rather we were listed in the US. I too would rather we were listed on, say, the NASDAQ but with the numbers the way they are that's not going to happen for a long time yet.Here is a good example of what Brainchip is missing.. Good PR. I thought the last question at the AMG was the best question there as it eluded to our poor PR. Brainchip only have about 13K of followers when we should have 100'sK of followers given we are suppose to be a world leader in our field. Also having a small amateur looking stand at trade shows etc. I believe our management need to urgently address this situation and start getting a PR agency on the job so we get onto Business channels and business journals etc. The CEO having a yearly interview with a small Australian Stock Analyst company is not going to cut it. He should be having interviews with the likes of Bloomberg channel and others like that... More impressive professional trade show stands and not a table with creased tabletop and a few PC like items demo'ing. Promoting our leading technology to the masses and how we can help improve the world and humanity. Maybe Management have it in mind and are awaiting till we have a couple more contracts.. If we want to be a big professional company then we need to think and act like one... I sure hope we will very soon.
Sadly analyst or big news outlets have no interest in OTC (penny stock) in the US whatsoever, nada.Here is a good example of what Brainchip is missing.. Good PR. I thought the last question at the AMG was the best question there as it eluded to our poor PR. Brainchip only have about 13K of followers when we should have 100'sK of followers given we are suppose to be a world leader in our field. Also having a small amateur looking stand at trade shows etc. I believe our management need to urgently address this situation and start getting a PR agency on the job so we get onto Business channels and business journals etc. The CEO having a yearly interview with a small Australian Stock Analyst company is not going to cut it. He should be having interviews with the likes of Bloomberg channel and others like that... More impressive professional trade show stands and not a table with creased tabletop and a few PC like items demo'ing. Promoting our leading technology to the masses and how we can help improve the world and humanity. Maybe Management have it in mind and are awaiting till we have a couple more contracts.. If we want to be a big professional company then we need to think and act like one... I sure hope we will very soon.
We will see what this Chinese chip can do…Here is a good example of what Brainchip is missing.. Good PR. I thought the last question at the AMG was the best question there as it eluded to our poor PR. Brainchip only have about 13K of followers when we should have 100'sK of followers given we are suppose to be a world leader in our field. Also having a small amateur looking stand at trade shows etc. I believe our management need to urgently address this situation and start getting a PR agency on the job so we get onto Business channels and business journals etc. The CEO having a yearly interview with a small Australian Stock Analyst company is not going to cut it. He should be having interviews with the likes of Bloomberg channel and others like that... More impressive professional trade show stands and not a table with creased tabletop and a few PC like items demo'ing. Promoting our leading technology to the masses and how we can help improve the world and humanity. Maybe Management have it in mind and are awaiting till we have a couple more contracts.. If we want to be a big professional company then we need to think and act like one... I sure hope we will very soon.
Without solid license signings… big revenue in long term, Nasdaq will smash us like nothing… take care what you wishSadly analyst or big news outlets have no interest in OTC (penny stock) in the US whatsoever, nada.
We have to get on NASDAQ to gain interest from everyone (US) like: Big institutional investors (Not allowed investing in OTC generally), analyst and large news outlets.
That's where the real big money are.
So at around 4-5US$ a share and things could get interesting very quickly.
I didn't say anything about up-listing with or without income did I?Without solid license signings… big revenue in long term, Nasdaq will smash us like nothing… take care what you wish
It was just generally meant. More like an Add.I didn't say anything about up-listing with or without income did I?
That just common sense, off course you don't go there before you are ready.
Wow, are you an expert on this as well!!It was just generally meant. More like an Add.
Because some people don’t know what it means to be in the Nasdaq. Even you’re qualified and you are a solid company, when you get in they will try to suck you out. Some companies gave up stock market and turned to normal LLC because they got tired of this game… nothing against your post
Go and eat a snickers KarenWow, are you an expert on this as well!!![]()
Just the sort of infantile response I was expectingGo and eat a snickers Karen
Yeah thank god your previous response to my post was full of academic analysis and fundamental evidence .Just the sort of infantile response I was expecting![]()
Sorry, it was a Furfy.........Yeah thank god your previous response to my post was full of academic analysis and fundamental evidence .
Yes it maybe nice to be on NASDAQ but management have stated they are happy being on ASX. Some years ago I was invested in an ASX company (With a OTC listing also) and they were on some of the big business shows in USA, on multiple occassions... so it can be done. Maybe we can wait till some contracts are signed beforehand.Sadly analyst or big news outlets have no interest in OTC (penny stock) in the US whatsoever, nada.
We have to get on NASDAQ to gain interest from everyone (US) like: Big institutional investors (Not allowed investing in OTC generally), analyst and large news outlets.
That's where the real big money are.
So at around 4-5US$ a share and things could get interesting very quickly.
I agree with you that we would not want to boast or make a lot of noise but just state some facts so our name gets more known.We will see what this Chinese chip can do…
I personally find Sean's response to this question regarding their PR measures very good. Personally, I'm also glad we don't have CEOs who just make a lot of noise without setting the sails. Look at some who boast too much and then go under... like MULLN and others. Big mouth, nothing behind it. Those who hold their shares long-term don't need short-term hyped news... you can see what happened after the Benz announcement... time will tell.