Just the thing for counting and recognizing reindeer.
To count sheep in Australia, we use a laser beam and detector mounted 10 cm above ground to count the legs, and then we divide by four.
Thank you very much. I'm off to bed now but will definitely look it up tomorrow.
I learned today by research that synopsys want to aquire Ansys or had aquired... I also learned by research that SMCI is the hardware partner from Ansys ....and our Vice President of Ecosystems & Partnerships from BRN worked for synopsys.
And anyone that says boomity boom boom has taken it from me or wait I may have taken it from someone else but I think I added the boomity..or was it the extra boom? But if someone then posts a triple boom will then I guess it becomes an original then my double boom becomes meaningless so before anyone mashes the post I declare Boomity boom boom BOOM!I am happy for you to win as you are so invested in this matter that it is obviously very important to you. Congratulations well done amazing research.
Clearly you have issues that go beyond the fact that I posted my original response suggesting Cambridge Consulting was my best pick and took offence at your response.
I quote:
Frangipani
“You may not like me, and that is fine with me (although it irks me how at times you post supposedly new information or profusely thank others for generously sharing reveals, (deliberately?) ignoring the fact that I had already posted about the exact same thing earlier - I am happy to provide proof), but don’t dish it out, if you can’t take it.”
Firstly I had no opinion about you that could amount to like or dislike prior to this current exchange. I can honestly say I do not think about you unless I have a cause to do so.
You are just a name on a page so how could I like or dislike you.
Secondly you clearly have a different approach to TSEx than myself.
You seem to think that everyone should read every one of your posts and catalogue the references so they never post a second time something you have freely shared without acknowledging you were the original poster.
You also seem to think that if another poster puts up the same research the only place they could have found it was by reading your posts.
You also seem to believe that every reader here starts from post one and reads through every post and in so doing will read everything posted by you days/weeks months/years before they first bought shares in Brainchip.
I have an entirely different view and if I was so minded (and I tell you in advance that I am not) I could find multiple examples of the same research that I and others have posted being posted by others again and again as if for the first time.
It is not an issue in my view and in fact I am pleased to see it occur as more people will get to read it.
By the way if you say I posted something that you posted earlier. I accept that. Guilty as charged.
It makes complete sense that this should happen given we are all researching the same subject. In fact it would be strange if it didn’t happen.
I know you won’t believe that I don’t read all of your posts and steal your research but sadly I don’t.
Often the print is too small on my phone to read your longer posts comfortably. I have narrow angle glaucoma which was mentioned to others here years ago and so I post from memory and when you say go and prove a proposition that is settled in my mind it ain’t going to happen.
Believe it or not winning an argument with you over a guessing game is not that important. I trust my memory and I know I am telling the truth as I believe it to be. I have dealt with that issue to my satisfaction and don’t care if you disagree.
I have no doubt that Full Moon Fever has it occur constantly so prolific is he with his research sharing that others will repost things he has found and posted.
I know Bravo another prolific poster has had this happen many times. I have even posted the same thing she has posted and she has pointed it out.
The most important thing in my opinion has always been that those who come here from time to time have an opportunity to benefit from the research regardless of who posted it because this could feed into greater understanding of Brainchip and an increase in the share price.
I am shallow like that it’s all about the value of my/our investment.
Something being posted more than once is more likely to be seen and read than a one off post that ends up buried by further posts.
You would have noticed the price of Brainchip and volume of shares traded has increased recently.
One of the likely outcomes is that new investors might visit TSEx.
Earlier tonight I posted an article about the Lorser alliance for two reasons one of which was to bring it to the attention of these new investors. I am pretty sure that similar articles about Lorser have been posted here previously.
What I now intend to do is promise never to try and read your posts again so that you will know that if I put up any research that you have posted already I have stolen it from someone else or actually (shock horror) found it by myself.
Goodbye and good luck.
Fact Finder
It made for a pleasant reprieve from the content of some other posts. So Thanks.And anyone that says boomity boom boom has taken it from me or wait I may have taken it from someone else but I think I added the boomity..or was it the extra boom? But if someone then posts a triple boom will then I guess it becomes an original then my double boom becomes meaningless so before anyone mashes the post I declare Boomity boom boom BOOM!
Lol O I had fun writing this. All u guys make me laugh, our minds all work the same at different speeds, we read different speeds, in different languages and we write in different ways despite all in English (though im sure @Diogenese he may be the exception) I for one am guilty of reading occasionally from the last page then back a few to catch up quicker then I might read from where I left off when I get time so yes I'M GUILTY for missing some peoples posts and I may be guilty of finding something that someone has already posted but who cares if it was 5 months ago I am guilty of rehashing because I WANT TO because I find it personally important to SHARE. Lol
Right enough of my rambling cause ci know have 10mins to get ready for work.
So Boomidy boom boom BOOM there I said it first. And if anyone one to copy or better it be my guest
I think you're safe there. That Patent you have just lodged will be safe for years, unless somebody does invent a time machine and decides to use language from the 1950's again......And anyone that says boomity boom boom has taken it from me or wait I may have taken it from someone else but I think I added the boomity..or was it the extra boom? But if someone then posts a triple boom will then I guess it becomes an original then my double boom becomes meaningless so before anyone mashes the post I declare Boomity boom boom BOOM!
Lol O I had fun writing this. All u guys make me laugh, our minds all work the same at different speeds, we read different speeds, in different languages and we write in different ways despite all in English (though im sure @Diogenese he may be the exception) I for one am guilty of reading occasionally from the last page then back a few to catch up quicker then I might read from where I left off when I get time so yes I'M GUILTY for missing some peoples posts and I may be guilty of finding something that someone has already posted but who cares if it was 5 months ago I am guilty of rehashing because I WANT TO because I find it personally important to SHARE. Lol
Right enough of my rambling cause ci know have 10mins to get ready for work.
So Boomidy boom boom BOOM there I said it first. And if anyone one to copy or better it be my guest
I like the line, Placing orders in advanced which require full payment.Thanks @rayzor
Very strict conditions! I think that's a good thing ..Do you want it or not
View attachment 57582