BRN Discussion Ongoing

[Fact Finder]

HI Chippers

I may have missed something along the way but I was under the impression Brainchip had 19 patents granted to date.
From our last Patent related ASX announcement
View attachment 56835

The site below offers 20.
The last one in here is dated July 2023.

https://patents.justia.com/assignee/brainchip-inc

Either way this page may be of interest to some.

Hi FK
This is the JAST patent that Brainchip first acquired as an exclusive licence then bought outright last year.

I suspect that they are only counting the patents they have developed and applied for in the 19 they mentioned and exclude this one because they bought it.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

 

[Pom down under]

No "gaps" today, for the douchebag chartists either

 

[Esq.111]

Do I dare ask about the 2:24-2:34 window today, after yesterday

Afternoon Harry ,

Id say shes all systems GO , built a nice little platform at the $0.28 to $0.29 level to spring off.

Volume on one day chart @ all time intervals is exhibiting signs of a Monumental up shift shortly, to myself anyway.


Regards,
Esq.

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

That doesn't make sense to me, with the volume yesterday, the late sell off, supposedly due to the "speeding ticket" was not "natural"..

Either there are droves of dumb shareholders, or shorts used yesterday, aren't being reported, in my opinion.

Hey Dingo.
I reckon a lot of retail are quite skittish around BRN atm.
We all watched it shoot to $2.34 on the back of the MB announcement and then repressed heavily over the last couple of years down to the 15 cent mark. With the benefit of hindsight, many of us have since kicked ourselves for not taking some profit near the highs and buying back in a big way at the lows.
So lots of nervous eyes focused on us at our lows suddenly see a long anticipated uptick but without any particular catalyst attached.
Yay, at last some movement in the desired direction. And at an accelerated rate.
But why?
We here know, or at least, have had multiple dots pointed out to us, indicative that the game is afoot, but I would suggest we are still a minority of the 40,000 retail with fingers in the pie.
The sudden movement particularly yesterday with the gap up on open, and the spike in volume, would have had alerts sounding around the country and no doubt many hearts a flutter.
But plenty, particularly those traders who have only recently bought in at the lows, ala Dolci and the Ariel star crew and they're ilk, would not have wanted to ride the rainbow down again, and seeing the reversal decided to lock in the gain.
I reckon this caused a bit of a cascade at the time, which the shorts are always aspiring too, but which is probably a healthy thing, hopefully establishing a more relaxed and sustained increase over time.

 

[DingoBorat]

I was expecting it be in the millions too, but not so.

Well it is "reported" shorts and I'm not aware of any kind of enforcement, for them to report..

Entity's like Citicorp, following the rules?..

Who's going to enforce such requirements?

The ASIC?

Shorting, by its very nature (unless it's advantageous to be known, as a fear tactic) is better disguised as the "Market's will"..

So I'm still confident, that a large amount were dumped yesterday.

 

[DingoBorat]

Hey Dingo.
I reckon a lot of retail are quite skittish around BRN atm.
We all watched it shoot to $2.34 on the back of the MB announcement and then repressed heavily over the last couple of years down to the 15 cent mark. With the benefit of hindsight, many of us have since kicked ourselves for not taking some profit near the highs and buying back in a big way at the lows.
So lots of nervous eyes focused on us at our lows suddenly see a long anticipated uptick but without any particular catalyst attached.
Yay, at last some movement in the desired direction. And at an accelerated rate.
But why?
We here know, or at least, have had multiple dots pointed out to us, indicative that the game is afoot, but I would suggest we are still a minority of the 40,000 retail with fingers in the pie.
The sudden movement particularly yesterday with the gap up on open, and the spike in volume, would have had alerts sounding around the country and no doubt many hearts a flutter.
But plenty, particularly those traders who have only recently bought in at the lows, ala Dolci and the Ariel star crew and they're ilk, would not have wanted to ride the rainbow down again, and seeing the reversal decided to lock in the gain.
I reckon this caused a bit of a cascade at the time, which the shorts are always aspiring too, but which is probably a healthy thing, hopefully establishing a more relaxed and sustained increase over time.

Yeah... but I don't buy that, with yesterday's volume.

 

[db1969oz]

Well it is "reported" shorts and I'm not aware of any kind of enforcement, for them to report..

Entity's like Citicorp, following the rules?..

Who's going to enforce such requirements?

The ASIC?

Shorting, by its very nature (unless it's advantageous to be known, as a fear tactic) is better disguised as the "Market's will"..

So I'm still confident, that a large amount were dumped yesterday.

I wasn’t even thinking that you don’t have to report the ! I assumed that short sales had to be reported? But I never actually checked up on the rules regarding reporting? I will have to look into that!

 

[db1969oz]

Well it is "reported" shorts and I'm not aware of any kind of enforcement, for them to report..

Entity's like Citicorp, following the rules?..

Who's going to enforce such requirements?

The ASIC?

Shorting, by its very nature (unless it's advantageous to be known, as a fear tactic) is better disguised as the "Market's will"..

So I'm still confident, that a large amount were dumped yesterday.

https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj0i_bY8amEAxU_wTgGHa2JDdIQFnoECA4QAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.marketindex.com.au%2Ffiles%2Fshort-selling%2FShort%2520selling%2520reporting%2520obligations%2520in%2520Australia%252010-12.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0KV9gdpg7Skhf7sdgv4n9B&opi=89978449

According to Dr google it is required that all shorts are reported by 9am the following morning? Not sure if there is a way for the sly muthas to get arrested it?

 

[DingoBorat]

I think it's pretty much self explanatory, that something's afoot? ..

 

[Diogenese]

HI Chippers

I may have missed something along the way but I was under the impression Brainchip had 19 patents granted to date.
From our last Patent related ASX announcement
View attachment 56835

The site below offers 20.
The last one in here is dated July 2023.

https://patents.justia.com/assignee/brainchip-inc

Either way this page may be of interest to some.

Hi FK,

The Justicia list includes both granted patents and pending applications in the US.

The applications are the ones which start with a year, so my count makes 12 granted US patents.

To see global position, try Espacenet:

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search?q=pa = Brainchip

The tedious bit:

I sort by 'Priority Date" rather than the default "Relevance" because who knows what the computer considers relevant, so the Priority Date provides some order.

It's difficult to get a consolidated list of patents/applications because the DB is designed by and for bureaucrats.

Unfortunately Espacenet only publishes the first publication of a patent family, so you need to dig deeper into each of the 14 listed patents/applications, to see the "family" in different countries. Click on the invention title and then use the drop down menu next to "Bibiliographic data". (The list includes "duplications")

Alternatively, on the Bibliographic Data page, the "published as" field lists the associated applications/patents - the patents end with "B2".

 

[Doz]

https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj0i_bY8amEAxU_wTgGHa2JDdIQFnoECA4QAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.marketindex.com.au%2Ffiles%2Fshort-selling%2FShort%2520selling%2520reporting%2520obligations%2520in%2520Australia%252010-12.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0KV9gdpg7Skhf7sdgv4n9B&opi=89978449

According to Dr google it is required that all shorts are reported by 9am the following morning? Not sure if there is a way for the sly muthas to get arrested it?

Hi db , you may find the below information of interest .

 

[Taproot]

 

[DingoBorat]

https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj0i_bY8amEAxU_wTgGHa2JDdIQFnoECA4QAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.marketindex.com.au%2Ffiles%2Fshort-selling%2FShort%2520selling%2520reporting%2520obligations%2520in%2520Australia%252010-12.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0KV9gdpg7Skhf7sdgv4n9B&opi=89978449

According to Dr google it is required that all shorts are reported by 9am the following morning? Not sure if there is a way for the sly muthas to get arrested it?

When you have enough money, you make your own rules.

Some of us, will know that feeling at some point, if we so choose.

Money, Power...Then... Then..

 

[db1969oz]

https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwj0i_bY8amEAxU_wTgGHa2JDdIQFnoECA4QAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Ffiles.marketindex.com.au%2Ffiles%2Fshort-selling%2FShort%2520selling%2520reporting%2520obligations%2520in%2520Australia%252010-12.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0KV9gdpg7Skhf7sdgv4n9B&opi=89978449

According to Dr google it is required that all shorts are reported by 9am the following morning? Not sure if there is a way for the sly muthas to get arrested it?

Maybe by keeping the numbers under .01%

Hi db , you may find the below information of interest .

View attachment 56849

Now that’s a loop hole that completely ruins any chance of a level playing field! Should be legal requirement to report all short sales!!

 

[DingoBorat]

Hi db , you may find the below information of interest .

View attachment 56849

Yeah that's what I'm talking about Doz

The rules are made to suit them, as well as, whether "they decide" to follow them or not, depends on how best it suits their agenda.

How many separate accounts can they use, if they actually "had" to stick within the limits, of non-disclosure, for amounts under 100k anyway?...

 

[7für7]

Someone with a working crystal ball ? The glass of mine is cracked and I can not recognise the numbers! Cheap Vietnamese copy… bought from a boat seller on the riverside of Mekong.

 

[Fenris78]

Someone with a working crystal ball ? The glass of mine is cracked and I can not recognise the numbers! Cheap Vietnamese copy… bought from a boat seller on the riverside of Mekong.

40c finish and after market announcement

 

[7für7]

40c finish and after market announcement

God bless you! Can you see also if “Tomjames” in the HC forum is the same like “tom&jerry”? This would indicate a strong dump

 

[DingoBorat]

Just to add to what you’re saying FF-

We know Brainchip are their first strategic IP partner, we know they love us, the CRO of edge impulse has said he sees us being adopted by every silicon vendor.
I encourage everybody to look at these 3 screenshots I am going to post.

View attachment 56809 View attachment 56810 View attachment 56812

Also, not known at the time of the bottom graphic, was our relationship with and now partner, Infineon

 

[Falling Knife]

Hi FK
This is the JAST patent that Brainchip first acquired as an exclusive licence then bought outright last year.

I suspect that they are only counting the patents they have developed and applied for in the 19 they mentioned and exclude this one because they bought it.

My opinion only DYOR
Fact Finder

Hi FK,

The Justicia list includes both granted patents and pending applications in the US.

The applications are the ones which start with a year, so my count makes 12 granted US patents.

To see global position, try Espacenet:

https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search?q=pa = Brainchip

The tedious bit:

I sort by 'Priority Date" rather than the default "Relevance" because who knows what the computer considers relevant, so the Priority Date provides some order.

It's difficult to get a consolidated list of patents/applications because the DB is designed by and for bureaucrats.

Unfortunately Espacenet only publishes the first publication of a patent family, so you need to dig deeper into each of the 14 listed patents/applications, to see the "family" in different countries. Click on the invention title and then use the drop down menu next to "Bibiliographic data". (The list includes "duplications")

Alternatively, on the Bibliographic Data page, the "published as" field lists the associated applications/patents - the patents end with "B2".

Thanks.. I knew there would be some reason for the variance.
As you were....