Lol, yes that is my main goal here, you caught me out. You are like the Collingwood football club, either love them or hate them. (I am a Cats supporter in case you missed the point) Although I am aware you like the last word and try your best to belittle people, I will also respond because you asked.
"What I would like to know from you though as a person who runs a successful business why you have so readily leapt to the conclusion that Brainchip's executive staff are not successful business people who work to improve staff performance and counsel the staff member, contractor or even the cadet from one of the University programs responsible for the error?" (Jesus I hope not)
I did not imply the majority of what you have written here, but you love to try and play the wordsmith and bend the meaning behind the truth. The truth is, I have not once before commented on the typos that happened previously. My question was how many errors are acceptable? You call anyone that isn't happy with the situation a troll and go off on a rage defending the company by telling everyone to ignore the errors, look at the content.
The errors are small, but for my liking becoming too frequent so I spoke up. If someone lost their job over this or were hung, drawn and quartered then fine but that is the companies business, if they told anyone what happened, that would again be very unprofessional.
So is this the case? Is the company running in an unprofessional manner? Typos, the wrong photo, pretty basic errors, can happen, and what about inviting a few SH to have a private chat? In the eyes of some (especially the invitees) this was all above board and a non-event, but not all believe this and many voiced their concerns. Me, well I have met and spoken with many execs in companies I hold, so for me it wasn't a huge deal but I respected their view. The company seems great, that's why I have invested, but like some when do we start to question if the problem is not the tech, but the people? Here's a quote from a professional in the field just recently. "There are areas I feel you are not explaining or under advertising as well as you could".
So what is my point? People have other points of view, and you make it difficult to question anything, because you label them as trolls. TBH this place was much better without you, as your research while seemingly wonderful has proven to be worthless. Your timelines have been awful and your prediction for revenue and shareprice have been abysmal.
These are the true FACTS, but alas you still have this overpowering sense of superiority over all. If I had $1 for every time you've told us you're a retired lawyer and some shitty story about it then I would likely have had more revenue than Brainchip.
Why am I letting it out today? Because unlike you, I will leave this forum and no longer post. It is clear people cannot question management or the company here without ramifications from the BRN almighty retired lawyer!!! I'm thinking you were more likely a catholic priest, in all respects.
So good luck with your investment here Mr Retired Lawyer, I do note, you use this title frequently to try and have your minions in awe, but someone who is proud of what they have achieved in the small business world is considered worthy of ridicule.
To the rest of the holders, good luck, remember FF has been wrong in all of his predictions to this point, (but only because of outside influences remember ROFL!) so he's not your messiah he's just a naughty little boy. Look on the bright side people, only invest what you can afford, and as good as a stock seems, there's a reason people don't put all their eggs in the one basket.
Adios.
interestingengineering.com
but in the meantime picked up this little beauty and only fitting i open it at $3.89.
”…..goes to BRAVO!!!
