... well at this time on Friday night ... res ipsa loquitur.‘At least 70% of shareholders are pissed’ - prove it
... well at this time on Friday night ... res ipsa loquitur.‘At least 70% of shareholders are pissed’ - prove it
Only read it cause they didn't add the word "anyway"![]()
What Is Neuromorphic Computing?
Neuromorphic computing is an emerging process that aims to mimic the structure and operation of the human brain, using artificial neurons and synapses to process information.accntu.re
Learning![]()
Incorrect they didn't invite me or maybe they did and i didn't see the email and im positve. But all in all if i have a question i seek the answer. I may have more shares then some of those that were invited so i found it a little odd but am i going to lose sleep over it? And the answer is No. I too along with a few others on here fly for the past couple years to the agm. And will be doing this again this year.BrainChip did what other companies also do ... invite influencers. They have to make sure that investors will not vote against BrainChip's management during the next annual meeting. So they probably only invited very active and positive BrainChip supporters who do not criticize the management. My guess.
Hi TechGood morning,
Despite what someone recently posted about Pia Turcinov being next to useless, questioning why she is even on our BOD and has she
actually brought anything to date to the Brainchip Holdings Ltd table, whilst receiving an NED's fee.
I found that a rather harsh view, having met Pia she came across to me as a very strong business minded lady, who I know Peter has a lot
of respect for, she has numerous contacts who can open up doors, becoming the first female to enter Brainchip's Board, having the founders
blessing I would have thought was enough.
Who got the WA Minister for Emergency Services; Innovation and the Digital Economy; Medical Research; Stephen Dawson to come to
visit our Perth Research Innovation Centre, I'm pretty sure it was Pia, but happy to be corrected by Tony if wrong.
It's all about teamwork, and Perth has a very solid team, I can't state as a fact, but I'd strongly suggest Pia has already opened up channels
that may have not at this stage been possible, mainly based around Peter's and the Perth teams already heavy workload.
Whatever the actual figure and/or bonus shares she receives, I personally believe it will pay off over the next 3 year period, if the Board
decides to part ways with Pia, I'm sure it will be mutual if it ever eventuates.
Have a great day ahead....Tech
Hi Sera, i like and value yr contributions but i don't get what seems a person attack on Pia? Brainchip are not stupid and there is obviously a strategic move of having Pia on board. May i suggest that you come to the next AGM where Pia attends (check first) and you can have a face to face discussion with Pia. It might answer all your concerns as im sure scanning thru linkedin activity is not a measure of ones ability. Please don't take offence that im just giving my view on this and directly replying to you.Hi Tech
Great post mate and I mean that.
Why didn't you respond to my post directly
instead of referring to it indirectly via another post several days later? You seem to have a habit of doing that.
If you had of responded to my post directly then everyone reading your post would see exactly what I had said, which is:
The only person I don't want to see re-elected at the next AGM is Pia. Loan, Antonio etc all come with significant semi-conductor industry experience and expertise. They've been there and have done it and consequently have great networks to leverage. Pia has none of that. Pia has very good board level experience and would be suitable for other listed companies, but not Brainchip. I am also annoyed by the fact she heavily promotes events, groups and other ideas on her LinkedIn, but never Brainchip, yet she is paid a significant sum for her seat at the table. Perhaps she does a lot behind the scenes. In that case the company needs to do a better job in showing the value added.
In response to your passive aggressive post:
Additionally, I have also highlighted a section of my post above which is probably the most important part of the Pia related paragraph, as it serves as a disclaimer for the very rare "constructive criticism" of the company that I have given.
- I did not say Pia was useless at all, i actually gave her a compliment by saying she has very good board level experience.
- I think the points I made about her lack of semiconductor industry experience are important as those networks create a DIRECT pathway to the company's that are most likely to sign licensing agreements.
- I also think her lack of sharing on LinkedIn is a fair comment. You may not have, but I did scroll back through 12 months of her LinkedIn feed, which took quite a while as she posts ALOT, and from memory she had shared one post of Anil Mankar's in which he had shared a Brainchip post. She also hasn't liked any brainchip content from memory. Her reshare of Anil's post and lack of engagement on Brainchip content made me wonder if she's even following our social media channels at all
It seems you have missed that disclaimer altogether, or perhaps you did read it which may be the reason why you didn't respond to me directly as then it would be easy for me and everyone else to call bullshit. In any case, your passive aggressive post has proven my final point in that paragraph correct:
Pia does do positive things behind the scenes and therefore brainchip could do a better job of showing the value she adds.
I am now wondering how you know Stephen Dawson visited the research institute, I think I missed that. Also keen to hear more about your strong views on channels that she has opened up, or are these points coming from private emails with Peter? If that's the case then the value Pia is adding is being ring fenced and should instead be advertised a little more widely, which again comes back to my disclaimer.
For what it's worth, you have posted about me in a passive aggressive manner on multiple occasions now. Please don't do that. If I say things you disagree with then call me out, let's openly discuss differing opinions, that is what the forum is for. I think by now you will know that I am a strong and positive supporter of Brainchip. We are on the same team.
Cheers
Thank you for your words! You both are among others my ~cornerstones and my ~bulwark. That sounds strange. But that's what I mean. You have to stick together. Different opinions with substance enrich our/my group. Avatars don't have to love each other like friends in real life. You're like the pillars of a chair (or the pillars under a house in Venice) and I'm just the felt pad under one of them so as not to scratch the floor. So what do I do when the pillars go against each other? Debating is enriching and it's a question of how to do it. So thank you again for your sincere, open and honest manner.Hi Tech
Great post mate and I mean that.
Why didn't you respond to my post directly
instead of referring to it indirectly via another post several days later? You seem to have a habit of doing that.
If you had of responded to my post directly then everyone reading your post would see exactly what I had said, which is:
The only person I don't want to see re-elected at the next AGM is Pia. Loan, Antonio etc all come with significant semi-conductor industry experience and expertise. They've been there and have done it and consequently have great networks to leverage. Pia has none of that. Pia has very good board level experience and would be suitable for other listed companies, but not Brainchip. I am also annoyed by the fact she heavily promotes events, groups and other ideas on her LinkedIn, but never Brainchip, yet she is paid a significant sum for her seat at the table. Perhaps she does a lot behind the scenes. In that case the company needs to do a better job in showing the value added.
In response to your passive aggressive post:
Additionally, I have also highlighted a section of my post above which is probably the most important part of the Pia related paragraph, as it serves as a disclaimer for the very rare "constructive criticism" of the company that I have given.
- I did not say Pia was useless at all, i actually gave her a compliment by saying she has very good board level experience.
- I think the points I made about her lack of semiconductor industry experience are important as those networks create a DIRECT pathway to the company's that are most likely to sign licensing agreements.
- I also think her lack of sharing on LinkedIn is a fair comment. You may not have, but I did scroll back through 12 months of her LinkedIn feed, which took quite a while as she posts ALOT, and from memory she had shared one post of Anil Mankar's in which he had shared a Brainchip post. She also hasn't liked any brainchip content from memory. Her reshare of Anil's post and lack of engagement on Brainchip content made me wonder if she's even following our social media channels at all
It seems you have missed that disclaimer altogether, or perhaps you did read it which may be the reason why you didn't respond to me directly as then it would be easy for me and everyone else to call bullshit. In any case, your passive aggressive post has proven my final point in that paragraph correct:
Pia does do positive things behind the scenes and therefore brainchip could do a better job of showing the value she adds.
I am now wondering how you know Stephen Dawson visited the research institute, I think I missed that. Also keen to hear more about your strong views on channels that she has opened up, or are these points coming from private emails with Peter? If that's the case then the value Pia is adding is being ring fenced and should instead be advertised a little more widely, which again comes back to my disclaimer.
For what it's worth, you have posted about me in a passive aggressive manner on multiple occasions now. Please don't do that. If I say things you disagree with then call me out, let's openly discuss differing opinions, that is what the forum is for. I think by now you will know that I am a strong and positive supporter of Brainchip. We are on the same team.
Cheers
I don't like it when people ~'attack' (angehen) someone who can't defend themselves (here at TSE). If against a person then not behindHi Sera, i like and value yr contributions but i don't get what seems a person attack on Pia? Brainchip are not stupid and there is obviously a strategic move of having Pia on board. May i suggest that you come to the next AGM where Pia attends (check first) and you can have a face to face discussion with Pia. It might answer all your concerns as im sure scanning thru linkedin activity is not a measure of ones ability. Please don't take offence that im just giving my view on this and directly replying to you.
Sorry cosors i have absolutely no idea what yr talking about here. I am not talking to someone behind their backs? I was replying directly to Sera that's an act of courtesy rather then anything else so i have no idea what you are going on about?I don't like it when people ~'attack' someone who can't defend themselves. If against a person then not behind their back and in their face. That's how I see it. You are much closer to the board than many of us are. I don't like it with Sean either, because for me as a person far away it's difficult to understand the pro and con arguments, another example. I'm used to the fact for me that there's almost never black and white. So at least a debate is important if someone wants to express their opinion directly against or in favour of a person. That creates transparency.
As long as a person doesn't make a demonstrable mistake or does something demonstrably outstanding criticism in an anonymous forum, whether negative or positive, is not particularly helpful. Just my opinion as an observer.
Excuse me, please. That's a misunderstanding and it's because of this format of an forum. I agree with you so I replied to your post in the affirmative. The behind the back thing is meant towards Pia who might be reading along here and can't defend herself.Sorry cosors i have absolutely no idea what yr talking about here. I am not talking to someone behind their backs? I was replying directly to Sera that's an act of courtesy rather then anything else so i have no idea what you are going on about?
Furthermore i am no closer to the board then anyone else let alone u or Sera even if in different countries so again i haven't the faintest what your talking about? Im simply saying you can't judge a person by linkedin activity.
I don't appreciate the attack cosor. Sayimg im much closer to the board is a pure and utter lie. Sorry to be blunt.
I also found the absolute buy comment interesting. Is he not convinced enough to actually buy, or is he just not interested in buying, or does he know that prices won't change alot over the next 12 months so why tie up capital, or is he comfortable with how many he has and how many more he will be given.![]()
FYI , Just to be clear, Re Sean and others, being able to purchase shares. At the recent Perth gathering , Sean acknowledged the difficulty of being allowed to purchase shares , since Black Out periods would be so extensive,as a result of their current privileged inside information.I think the latter- He doesn’t have to..
He already gets compensated very well in share based payments.. And if the company translates its ground work into success there will be further rewards in options and performance rights.. So both outcomes lead to not requiring self-purchasing of shares on market.
He will just pay a few $$ to convert options into shares..
I understand now, its tricky when language is a barrier and good that you re explained your meanings here now lol all good cosors i was just making sure that you were not suddenly sufferimg from some seizure or something. Lol peace to you and thanks. ❤ ps the phrase is behind the scenes not behind their backsExcuse me, please. That's a misunderstanding and it's because of this format of an forum. I agree with you so I replied to your post in the affirmative. The behind the back thing is meant towards Pia who might be reading along here and can't defend herself.
I really appreciate all three of you. That was by no means meant against you and not an attack. I will gladly delete my
post if you think that's better.
I also realise that I have a language barrier and probably write a lot of things in a misleading way. My English skills are still young and developing.
So please forgive me if you feel offended by me. Personally, the problem would not exist I am sure. You are my group.
By closer on board I mean that you can/could or joined at the AGMs for example or met as others in persona. I am 14,600 kilometres away. I will never meet the board in person.
____
By the way, I am also a polite person and without any dodgy thoughts. I was excited from the beginning when I saw that some of you meet in person, catch up.
View attachment 49846
What perhaps helps to clarify is that in German when I mean several of you and not just you these are two completely different words and not just -> 'you'. For us, du/you is different to euch/you. So it's difficult for me to mean e.g. you three or just you. Language barrier ... and I like to learn.Excuse me, please. That's a misunderstanding and it's because of this format of an forum. I agree with you so I replied to your post in the affirmative. The behind the back thing is meant towards Pia who might be reading along here and can't defend herself.
I really appreciate all three of you. That was by no means meant against you and not an attack. I will gladly delete my
post if you think that's better.
I also realise that I have a language barrier and probably write a lot of things in a misleading way. My English skills are still young and developing.
So please forgive me if you feel offended by me. Personally, the problem would not exist I am sure. You are my group.
By closer on board I mean that you can/could or joined at the AGMs for example or met as others in persona. I am 14,600 kilometres away. I will never meet the board in person.
____
By the way, I am also a polite person and without any dodgy thoughts. I was excited from the beginning when I saw that some of you meet in person, catch up.
View attachment 49846
Hi MDHi Sera, i like and value yr contributions but i don't get what seems a person attack on Pia? Brainchip are not stupid and there is obviously a strategic move of having Pia on board. May i suggest that you come to the next AGM where Pia attends (check first) and you can have a face to face discussion with Pia. It might answer all your concerns as im sure scanning thru linkedin activity is not a measure of ones ability. Please don't take offence that im just giving my view on this and directly replying to you.