McHale
Regular
Well that's interesting @TECH, because the entity or individuals you allude to had 109 million votes they used to vote to unseat Peter, but as you said "I reserve my opinion as it's now water under the bridge".Hello,
After the AGM in 2022 I spoke with three individuals whom I can't name in regards to the volume of votes to try and unsettle Peter
from our Board.
I do believe it is known which entity/individual was attempting to make a statement, was it a former disgruntled employee ? I reserve
my opinion as it's now water under the bridge.
Any shareholder whatever their category attempting to remove our Founder would be committing suicide, both Peter and Anil will
retire in their own good time or earlier if illness effects their ability to function at the high levels that they both set for themselves, in my
opinion for what it's worth.
Nvidia has always been the company that I've believed may make a play for us over the next 5 years, yes it's a guess, but a good one !
Regards....Tech![]()
What I have been speculating on really is; could there be a relationship between the actor(s) who voted against PVDM at AGM 2022 and possibly the actor(s) who voted down the remuneration package at AGM 2023.
Both actions could be construed as "not a good look for the company" for market participants or share holders or investors who might be considering buying into BRN.
At current Market Cap BRN is very cheap, but I wasn't speculating about takeovers, and quite frankly that would be one of the last things I want to see at the moment, having lost so much paper money on this particular investment since early last year.
Last edited: