Vladsblood
Regular
I reckon its meaning that , We started from the bottom Index and are now rapidly realising we need to go to the Head Index. LOL. Vlad.
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
robsmark
Regular
We need to do much better before we list on the Nasdaq. Much better. If we listed with current fundamentals, we’d be absolutely crushed.
The company is right in wanting to extract more out of the ASX first. We need to demonstrate revenue, learn the treats of larger companies, and develop a reputation in industry before we even consider relisting,
Nasdaq talk at this stage is a fallacy. You might think it would fix our problems, but you’re wrong. It would open us up to a level of manipulation and short selling like we’ve never seen before. We as a company have a lot of growing up to do first.
Last edited:
Kachoo
Regular
RM YOUR right but from this level shorting 230 million not much money to be made only 230 if zero right if they run it to 5 billion MC then Billions to make
lol. At this moment it's collect as many cheapees as one can.Vladsblood
Regular
Sorry on the blanketty blank LOL.
Morning robsmark, Don't we have major management from USA on board from ARM who know the Nasdaq ropes?
I am thinking that income won't be lumpy but will show up rapidly and keep accelerating as the EAP's try to get our IP stranglehold out there first! Much the same as the 100 metre sprint. Cheers robsmark respect your input too! Vlad.
robsmark
Regular
RM YOUR right but from this level shorting 230 million not much money to be made only 230 if zero right if they run it to 5 billion MC then Billions to make
The SP needs to be built strong with holders wanting it as a long term investment. We don’t want these scoundrels to pump it to $5b, we want a sustainable relate built on good fundamentals. The company needs to start demonstrating revenue for this to happen, and build that revenue over a couple of years. We’ve a way to go.
robsmark
Regular
Hey Vlad,
I respect your input too mate, and hope you’re well.
I think having a seasoned board is what will prevent us listing on the Nasdaq. I believe they know full well what happens to premature listings which is why the company has stamped out any whispers of the relisting as soon as they start.
I hope you’re right about accelerated revenue, I’m ready to start seeing it!
Cheers
Mccabe84
Regular
While doing some research on institutional ownership and shorting in BRN vs other companies I have noticed that in the other companies they are not accumulating in them while shorting.. i could be wrong but here’s one example of BRN vs CXO for others to make their own minds up
Attachments
HopalongPetrovski
I'm Spartacus!
Thank you Dio for providing us with some context and an explanation from your understanding, in plain english.
Indeed, the processing step up from the recognition of a predetermined wake word to the complexity of NLP in one generation is astounding to me.
And beyond the building blocks of dictionaries and thesauri surely any system will require access and application rules of syntax and grammar in order to produce anything more than a parroting of language?
Is the mere application of rules enough to provide an adequate simulacrum of consciousness?
Although on reflection that is somewhat the situation now with Chat GPT isn't it.
It has been refined and trained enough though to furnish a usable tool.
So are you saying that some version of all this evaluation, processing and reconciliation (if provisioned with access to a sufficiently worthy model library held separately in memory) could be carried out in Akida 2000 hardware rather than the current software emulations?
I would imagine that initially it would be bound within the confines of specific use cases such as the teaching of/ or the translation of a specific language perhaps or some other definable subject such as biology.
Perhaps I am getting carried away with the immediate potentialities of the tech as is my wont.
I suffer from a somewhat retrofuturistic syndrome bought about by a far too liberal dose of the Jetsons, Lost in Space and Star Trek in my television irradiated youth.
Anyway, Thank You again for all your continuing valuable contributions here.
Well done.
Schnitzel lover
Regular
Great post.. I agree that’s what’s happening now..So 12.5c next week.. Close to maximum fear so could be good buying here
Kachoo
Regular
RB I agree fundamentals aka revenue and forecasts are very very important but in this sector the SP or MC will in the Billions before the Reveue is recorded imo. The problem we are seeing atm is confidence but larger end that Instos feel.they don't have enough shares IMO.
We will see when the next pop happens but the story needs to change so there has to be significant news like a strong partner with equity or strong IP buyer. It will happen soon IMO but it's time.
I guess it's my thoughts on how I thinking will play out. Imnsure nobody thought this would happen to this level enliven those bashers calling these prices.
DingoBorat
Slim
"The forthcoming MI300-series data center chip combines a CPU with a GPU. “We actually think we will be the industry leader for inference solutions, because of some of the choices that we’ve made in our architecture,” says Su"Sounds like they're all about to give NVIDIA a run for their money.......Interesting timing wouldn't you say?
SOMEONE'S IP IS LEVELLING THE PLAYING FIELD. I BELIEVE IT'S OURS.
If not ours then who's? No one else has the capacity to be that disruptive.
And let's not forget the fact the BRN have had a KNOWN RELATIONSHIP with XILNIX the company AMD bought out and claimed they were developing their new chips based on.....
THIS is why our share price is being fkd with so much
THIS is why I keep telling myself if i hold long enough, it will all be worth it.
Opinion only. Dyor.
-------------------------------------------------------
“I think this is an opportunity for us to write the next chapter of the AMD growth story,” Su told Fortune in a mid-September interview. “There are so few companies in the world that have access to the [intellectual property] that we have
**(3rd party IP!!)**
and the customer set that we have, and the opportunity frankly to really shape how AI is adopted across the world. I feel like we have that opportunity.”
The forthcoming MI300-series data center chip combines a CPU with a GPU. “We actually think we will be the industry leader for inference solutions, because of some of the choices that we’ve made in our architecture,” says Su.
Morningstar’s Colello agrees that the market is evolving—and isn’t counting out AMD nemesis Intel’s own efforts to challenge Nvidia with its new AI processors, Gaudi2 (for training) and Greco (for inference). “There’s naturally plenty of incentive for all of these companies to not be beholden to Nvidia, and to want more competition, and to write the software and transfer the models and take all the steps necessary to ensure a healthy ecosystem that includes Nvidia plus AMD plus perhaps Intel and also their own internal chips that they’re all developing,” he said.
View attachment 46500AMD’s Lisa Su is ready to crash Nvidia’s trillion-dollar chips party | Fortune
fortune-com.cdn.ampproject.org
It may be hopeful, but it is possible, that some of the above information, is a "Red Herring" or a misleading statement..
“There are so few companies in the world that have access to the [intellectual property] that we have"
Your "hook" could refer to us, but I'm hoping "so few" will end up not being the case..
Or a least a big enough "few"..
The answer to the question, of could AKIDA in such an A.I. application, make AMD, potentially an "industry leader" is obviously yes.
But there is a tonne of brilliant IP out there, this is definitely a bone, hopefully we'll see some meat on it soon..
More obvious with our xilnix connection.....
BrainChip Introduces World's First Commercial Hardware Acceleration of Neuromorphic Computing
BrainChip Introduces World's First Commercial Hardware Acceleration of Neuromorphic Computing September 12, 2017
brainchip.com
Kachoo
Regular
I would believe that highlights the theory of the manipulation happening. Also it shows how the potential for SNN technology is more limitless then a resource stock that is bound by the property size.
It's extreamly hard to gauge the market size for SNN cause it in limits infancy and Instos have estimates and reports us retail will never see.imo
DingoBorat
Slim
We have connections everywhere.More obvious with our xilnix connection.....
BrainChip Introduces World's First Commercial Hardware Acceleration of Neuromorphic Computing
BrainChip Introduces World's First Commercial Hardware Acceleration of Neuromorphic Computing September 12, 2017
I don't think that adds any extra weight..
Yes we need to up-list in the US asap, agreed.
The institutions are not allowed to trade OTC stocks in the US so very little is going on there.
From Investopedia:
While many financial institutions are prohibited from trading penny stocks, loosely regulated hedge funds have no such restrictions. That said, most hedge funds won't trade penny stocks on the long side: They far prefer short-selling penny stocks that look to have peaked after being heavily promoted. Penny stocks, although they often do indeed trade for mere pennies, can still be exceedingly dangerous to short because of the risk of a short squeeze. So while the risk-reward payoff for shorting a penny stock is too skewed (i.e., offering a limited reward if the short strategy works and unlimited risk if it doesn't) to be worthwhile for an average investor, the strategy may entice a deep-pocketed hedge fund.
Who Actually Trades or Invests in Penny Stocks?
Although penny stocks are highly speculative, millions of people trade them daily.
That's right. Edge AGI will not use the global model library of ChatGPT. It's LLM model libraries will be subject specific. But they will still be large. If you look at Zack Shelby's graph from the other day showing the adaptation of Nvidia's model libraries to different size processors, you can see the correlation between model size and performance for von Neumann processors, and how Akida's digital SNN breaks that model by greatly reducing the model size for superior performance.Thank you Dio for providing us with some context and an explanation from your understanding, in plain english.
Indeed, the processing step up from the recognition of a predetermined wake word to the complexity of NLP in one generation is astounding to me.
And beyond the building blocks of dictionaries and thesauri surely any system will require access and application rules of syntax and grammar in order to produce anything more than a parroting of language?
Is the mere application of rules enough to provide an adequate simulacrum of consciousness?
Although on reflection that is somewhat the situation now with Chat GPT isn't it.
It has been refined and trained enough though to furnish a usable tool.
So are you saying that some version of all this evaluation, processing and reconciliation (if provisioned with access to a sufficiently worthy model library held separately in memory) could be carried out in Akida 2000 hardware rather than the current software emulations?
I would imagine that initially it would be bound within the confines of specific use cases such as the teaching of/ or the translation of a specific language perhaps or some other definable subject such as biology.
Perhaps I am getting carried away with the immediate potentialities of the tech as is my wont.
I suffer from a somewhat retrofuturistic syndrome bought about by a far too liberal dose of the Jetsons, Lost in Space and Star Trek in my television irradiated youth.
Anyway, Thank You again for all your continuing valuable contributions here.
Well done.
As you say, the rules of syntax are part of the mix. This is also important in translation from one language to another. Those crazy French always have the cart in front of the horse.
Even if we are at the point where the systems can understand language, I don't think that we are at the point of creating consciousness, where the silicon can think for itself. I don't know how you would even define consciousness in the context of a computer. They are already "aware" of their environment. They can be progremmed to respond to their environment. Tesla claims to have trained an AV based on millions of hours of footage, without using object classification.
Now you've made me go down this rabbit hole:
Is consciousness the difference between learning and thinking?
Learning is a prerequisite for thinking.
Language is not a prerequisite for sensory learning.
Sensory learning does lead to a level of thinking in sentient beings, eg, burning one's hand on the hotplate, (one-shot learning?). You "learn" that that was a painful experience - most people would "think" that they will not do that again.
Language is a prerequisite for some forms of abstract thinking, but does imagination require language?
Are there different forms of consciousness?
https://www.britannica.com/story/why-a-computer-will-never-be-trulyconscious
Why a computer will never be truly conscious
...Even before Turing’s work, German quantum physicist Werner Heisenberg showed that there was a distinct difference in the nature of the physical event and an observer’s conscious knowledge of it. This was interpreted by Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger to mean that consciousness cannot come from a physical process, like a computer’s, that reduces all operations to basic logic arguments.
These ideas are confirmed by medical research findings that there are no unique structures in the brain that exclusively handle consciousness. Rather, functional MRI imaging shows that different cognitive tasks happen in different areas of the brain. This has led neuroscientist Semir Zeki to conclude that “consciousness is not a unity, and that there are instead many consciousnesses that are distributed in time and space.” That type of limitless brain capacity isn’t the sort of challenge a finite computer can ever handle.
Written by Subhash Kak, Regents Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Oklahoma State University.
The great thing about Heisenberg is his uncertainty principle which has been my lodestone.
DingoBorat
Slim
My understanding, is that the preparation has been done for a NASDAQ listing previously.
But we are so far off that presently..
We can and need to start making a real impact first.
We won't be listing on the NASDAQ, until we have solid recurring and increasing revenue and are profitable, by a good margin.
We need to be in the dollars, share price wise, but jumping there won't do it, unless the revenue is rolling in to support it, in my opinion.
The Company has already stated, that there is more to be gotten (screwed?) out of the ASX first..
Interesting like from Anil
Last edited:
Similar threads
