Hey Dio,Hi SiD,
I usually try to avoid semantic discussions, but I think this is an important discussion to have.
Yes. Seem's the ASX200 has become a real gauntlet now.And now poor old Weebit look like they are going to go through what BRN went through, WBT were
34th on the 04/09/23 and now 19th. This should not be allowed.
Hi GazDix,This reminds me of OpenAI and their crazy valuation.
I think about the timeframe Viana and others talk about 3 or 4 years to get product to market. But @Diogenese is there anything stopping Brainchip to partner with someone small like a doorball manufacturer and trying if the proof in concept works in a small consumer market/situation? Just like with ChatGPT it may go gangbusters? @Realinfo thought about this as well.
On an unrelated note, I and many fellow SHs know that BRN are in a prime position to capitalise on a possibly very lucrative technological breakthrough. Will bad actors come out and try to stop it or slow it down? Of course.
At least we can trade our shares. I've held AVZ for about 4 years, 18 months in suspension. Why? Same as BRN. Risk taking. Lithium deposit in volatile DRC Africa. Commanding a locked 2.75 billion MC (AVZ) to 375 million MC (BRN). Who said this was boring?
Ah, but 4DS's star is rising. It is up 450% this financial year (3 cents to 16.5). You win some, you lose some.And now poor old Weebit look like they are going to go through what BRN went through, WBT were
34th on the 04/09/23 and now 19th. This should not be allowed.
a man after my own heart. Your points are well taken. I suspect I may be projecting a little of my early feeling about BRN as I bought back a few years at $0.06 before the drop during COVID. Back in those days it was a “highly speculative” stock (for me anyway) and it’s still a little of that in my mind.Hi SiD,
I usually try to avoid semantic discussions, but I think this is an important discussion to have.
The term you used was "highly speculative". You've now tactically withdrawn to the more defensible "speculative" position.
Certainly dot-joining is speculation, but we have substantial links as well.
The technology is proven, so it is not speculative, so I guess the speculation is about whether there is a market which BRN can exploit profitably.
We have take-off orders from Renesas, MegaChips and VVDN. All that is speculative here is the tons of production and price per kg of Akida.
We know that Akida 1 blew the socks of a number of EAPs (Mercedes, Prophesee, nViso, ...), and that we have a sweet spot for lidar (Valeo). Whether or not they bite is, to different degrees, speculative, but is there anything better on the horizon?
We know that some EAPs have postponed final assessment, not because Akida 1 was a dud, but because Akida 2 with TeNNs and ViT is remarkably better. If Akida 1 had not passed muster or been shown to be hot air, would they have wasted their time assessing Akida 2? (Rhetorical rather than speculation).
We also know that for some potential applications some customers have found that existing solutions are "good enuf" for present purposes. In time, some of them may come to recognize what additional benefits Akida opens up for them (Small "s" speculation).
As to financial attractiveness, we have seen the Nvidia/Akida price/performance comparison. Nvidia may win a few on brand recognition, but ...
... and let's not forget that the lead time can be up to 4 years before a product hits the market .
I do not classify BRN as speculative, much less highly speculative, so I guess my speculatometer has a higher threshold than yours.
I'm sure we can agree to disagree at the $2 party early next year.
TECH this kind of post is just unnecessary and unwarranted. We should be all better than this. I realize that it is a stressful time but lets just breathe and regain a perspective on life. It's short, do your best and don't sweat the small stuff.No wonder the company doesn't reply to your email/s as much anymore, making false statements about what someone said or that you assumed that they implied, trying to belittle people if they don't always go along with your rhetoric, resorting to nasty name calling really exposes the inner personality that only close family members would have witnessed on a daily basis.
Not all posters have fallen under your self-righteous, opinionated, my way or the highway views approach.
>ACH
$2.75 by end of 2022 or by end of 2023...I've forgotten as we sit at 0.19c.
Not everyone on this forum is that gullible.
A few comments shared by an anonymous poster on a public forum....if the cap fits, well then, wear it.
Footnote: The company staff are all extremely busy, positive and upbeat about the direction we are ALL heading in, AKD 2.0 is still on
schedule or more to the point, news as I stated would more than likely appear in the last few (business) days of September.
Tony can only pass on information that the company has approved, nothing is or should be his personal opinion on the current state of affairs,
he is a loyal servant to us all, please be respectful when emailing him or phoning.
Siemens Healthcare is worth digging into, for the great detectives out there in my opinion.
God bless.....Tech
For the full version
"Efficient Neuromorphic Computing with Dynamic Vision Sensor, Spiking Neural Network Accelerator and Hardware-aware Algorithms," a Presentation from Arizona State University
Jae-sun Seo, Associate Professor at Arizona State University, presents the "Efficient Neuromorphic Computing with Dynamic Vision Sensor, Spiking Neuralwww.edge-ai-vision.com
Here's a must read article IMO from 30 June 2023, which talks about reaching a tipping point where neuromorphic computing concepts may change computing for good. The article contains statements from Marcus Kennedy (GM for Gaming at Intel).
Check out what he had to say just a few months ago below!
So, on the one hand we have Intel admitting they haven't cracked the nut and then we have us on the other hand knowing that WE are the mother of all nut-crackers!
View attachment 45133
View attachment 45132
View attachment 45130
We're on the brink of the biggest changes to computing's DNA and it's not just quantum that's coming
We're not at the tipping point yet, however. The hardware is still nascent and "the thing that we haven't cracked yet is the software."www.pcgamer.com
I think everybody knows not to hold their breath when someone announces something here, like your departure from this forum for the second time (lol).
Hi SiD,
I usually try to avoid semantic discussions, but I think this is an important discussion to have.
The term you used was "highly speculative". You've now tactically withdrawn to the more defensible "speculative" position.
Certainly dot-joining is speculation, but we have substantial links as well.
The technology is proven, so it is not speculative, so I guess the speculation is about whether there is a market which BRN can exploit profitably.
We have take-off orders from Renesas, MegaChips and VVDN. All that is speculative here is the tons of production and price per kg of Akida.
We know that Akida 1 blew the socks of a number of EAPs (Mercedes, Prophesee, nViso, ...), and that we have a sweet spot for lidar (Valeo). Whether or not they bite is, to different degrees, speculative, but is there anything better on the horizon?
We know that some EAPs have postponed final assessment, not because Akida 1 was a dud, but because Akida 2 with TeNNs and ViT is remarkably better. If Akida 1 had not passed muster or been shown to be hot air, would they have wasted their time assessing Akida 2? (Rhetorical rather than speculation).
We also know that for some potential applications some customers have found that existing solutions are "good enuf" for present purposes. In time, some of them may come to recognize what additional benefits Akida opens up for them (Small "s" speculation).
As to financial attractiveness, we have seen the Nvidia/Akida price/performance comparison. Nvidia may win a few on brand recognition, but ...
... and let's not forget that the lead time can be up to 4 years before a product hits the market .
I do not classify BRN as speculative, much less highly speculative, so I guess my speculatometer has a higher threshold than yours.
I'm sure we can agree to disagree at the $2 party early next year.
Another like from RT
Sally Ward-Foxton on LinkedIn: #intelinnovation
Delighted to meet the director of Intel Corporation's Neuromorphic Computing Lab, Mike Davies at #IntelInnovation - and see Kapoho Point (4x Loihi2) board…www.linkedin.com