Good article comparing ARM and Nvidia in regards to being involved with AI:
Softbank, the owner of Arm, and its positioning of the British chip designer as an AI play, ahead of its blockbuster initial public offering (IPO).
www.google.com
"
Arm's future in AI
Arm's AI future is unlikely to come from the huge amounts of chips required to train big data models.
Instead, it's more likely to be a major player in AI on the "edge." This phrase refers to AI processes carried out on a device, such as a smartphone, rather than in the cloud, like ChatGPT.
For this to happen, devices will require low-power but high-performance chips able to carry out the computing required for AI applications. Arm is designing the architecture for these chips.
"If you're doing AI on a smartphone or car you're not going to have that same level of compute power, so you need to optimize the model to run locally," Peter Richardson, research director at Counterpoint Research, told CNBC.
"Those processors will almost certainly be Arm-based"
"Arm is unlikely to see the benefit from AI filter through to its revenue for at least three-to-five years, Richard Windsor, founder of Radio Free Mobile, told CNBC.
What SoftBank has been required to do is to sell Arm as an AI company like Nvidia," Windsor said.
"Now, in the long term absolutely, I'm a big proponent on running AI on end-devices, it makes an awful lot of economic sense for the provider of the service, and also much more in general in terms of the quality of the service, privacy and security and so on and so forth. But those revenues are not accruing to Arm right now."
News is getting out there that running AI on end-devices is the more logical way to go. Imagine the number of investors and businesses reading this article from CNBC.