MB is not an NDA but rather an EAP. I suppose NVIDIA is an NDA. Gets confusing though.
Hey Dhm,
I can tell you without a shadow of a doubt that if MB are an EAP customer, they’re under an NDA. I’ve signed countless NDAs as a consultant and they are usually at a very early stage of any contractual discussion.
With a tech like Akida, Brainchip would have all EAP customers signing a watertight NDA. This would protect their IP should the customer decide against using Akida (also applicable if they do). The conditions attached to that NDA are anyone’s guess, but the tweet last year tells me one of two things:
1. MB aren’t an NDA customer (for what it’s worth I believe they are); or
2. There is nothing in the NDA prohibiting about referencing the Akida generally, and it solely focuses on technical attributes.
It
could also be that MB received a “please explain” from Brainchip last year following the tweet, resulting in their continued silence since.
Just some rambling thoughts.