Tothemoon24
Top 20
Hi @Terroni2105Do we have a link / dot to Mobileye? I can’t remember
I’m not sure if we have ever been directly link ..
Mobileye is well & truly involved with Ford & Intel
Hi @Terroni2105Do we have a link / dot to Mobileye? I can’t remember
I am a believer of;With all these partnerships is BRN taking a leaf out of Don Juans book?
I understand why you would prefer not to mention them, but the reality is that their lies are read by more people than the TSEx readership.
It would be interesting to plot the coincidence of MF hit pieces against BrainChip good news.
I was listening to an interview with Emad Mostaque and he uses Perplexity rather than ChatGPT or Bing because it gives you sources. So I tried it.Do we have a link / dot to Mobileye? I can’t remember
Thanks Fact Finder, for your sharing of such substantially significant and substantiated responses received back from the Co and Tony Dawe.Hi JD
Your post brought me here much sooner than I anticipated but so be it. The following I believe destroys any ill-conceived notion that those you are addressing might attempt to promulgate that AKD1000 was a failure. If it was a failure then Brainchip would not exist as it is built from the same neural fabric which is the underpinnings of all AKIDA technology.
Kind regards
Fact Finder.
MY QUESTION:
"Hi Tony - 26.4.23
I perhaps jumped the gun on one part of my criticisms having received an email this morning advertising the podcast.
As a result of the answer Sean gave regarding the AKIDA 2nd Gen the manipulators have been out in force relying upon his answer to claim AKD1000 has been a dud.
I am not concerned about this but perhaps this is something to keep in mind for further presentations.
After all AKD1000 achieved the only IP sales in the history of Brainchip to Renesas and MegaChips not to mention the EAP customer engagements.
One clarification I have is around the neural fabric used in AKD1000, AKD1500 and AKIDA 2nd Gen.
My understanding was/is that the neural fabric was/is the same across all three. Is this correct?
If so then essentially the only difference is the additions to or the takeaways from, such as removing the CPU from AKD1500?
Also I have assumed that this being the case it is open to potential customers to purchase more or less nodes of AKD1500 and AKIDA 2nd Gen as Renesas did of AKD1000?
Regards
FF
THE ANSWER:
Hi .....,
Tony Dawe <tdawe@brainchip.com>
Wed, Apr 26, 12:58 PM
to me
I referred your question on technology to Peter van der Made.
Peter has replied below.
“The neural fabric is the same across all three chips, with minor modifications to allow for new functions. The AI market is a fast moving field, with new network technologies that appear every few months. We cannot afford to stand still. We are aiming the 2nd generation of Akida ahead of a moving target.
We took away the CPU from the AKD1500 to provide clients with a neuromorphic processor that is smaller and has a lower power consumption. This was the result of customer interactions because MCUs have their own CPU. The onboard CPU in AKD1000 makes sense for a stand-alone chip. Our IP is integrated within an MCU, so they do not need the CPU.
The AKD1000 is not superseded and remains part of our offering as a single-chip solution.”
I hope Peter’s response addresses your question.
Regards
Tony Dawe
Director, Global Investor Relations
They do the tomatoes don't they?Which one is Liz Truss ?
We cannot afford to stand still. We are aiming the 2nd generation of Akida ahead of a moving target.Hi JD
Your post brought me here much sooner than I anticipated but so be it. The following I believe destroys any ill-conceived notion that those you are addressing might attempt to promulgate that AKD1000 was a failure. If it was a failure then Brainchip would not exist as it is built from the same neural fabric which is the underpinnings of all AKIDA technology.
Kind regards
Fact Finder.
MY QUESTION:
"Hi Tony - 26.4.23
I perhaps jumped the gun on one part of my criticisms having received an email this morning advertising the podcast.
As a result of the answer Sean gave regarding the AKIDA 2nd Gen the manipulators have been out in force relying upon his answer to claim AKD1000 has been a dud.
I am not concerned about this but perhaps this is something to keep in mind for further presentations.
After all AKD1000 achieved the only IP sales in the history of Brainchip to Renesas and MegaChips not to mention the EAP customer engagements.
One clarification I have is around the neural fabric used in AKD1000, AKD1500 and AKIDA 2nd Gen.
My understanding was/is that the neural fabric was/is the same across all three. Is this correct?
If so then essentially the only difference is the additions to or the takeaways from, such as removing the CPU from AKD1500?
Also I have assumed that this being the case it is open to potential customers to purchase more or less nodes of AKD1500 and AKIDA 2nd Gen as Renesas did of AKD1000?
Regards
FF
THE ANSWER:
Hi .....,
Tony Dawe <tdawe@brainchip.com>
Wed, Apr 26, 12:58 PM
to me
I referred your question on technology to Peter van der Made.
Peter has replied below.
“The neural fabric is the same across all three chips, with minor modifications to allow for new functions. The AI market is a fast moving field, with new network technologies that appear every few months. We cannot afford to stand still. We are aiming the 2nd generation of Akida ahead of a moving target.
We took away the CPU from the AKD1500 to provide clients with a neuromorphic processor that is smaller and has a lower power consumption. This was the result of customer interactions because MCUs have their own CPU. The onboard CPU in AKD1000 makes sense for a stand-alone chip. Our IP is integrated within an MCU, so they do not need the CPU.
The AKD1000 is not superseded and remains part of our offering as a single-chip solution.”
I hope Peter’s response addresses your question.
Regards
Tony Dawe
Director, Global Investor Relations
just wait til you see BrainChip's hockey stick!We cannot afford to stand still. We are aiming the 2nd generation of Akida ahead of a moving target.
Ice hockey star Wayne Gretzky famously said, “I skate to where the puck is going, not where it has been.
Bloody nice find @DallasDanilo Pietro Pau on LinkedIn: San Jose using AI to improve pedestrian safety
An awesome/outstanding example of what TinyML enables by connecting its members like Sony (imagers), Infineon Technologies (radar), BrainChip (neural…www.linkedin.com
So nice of the Senior customer success manager at GOOGLE to post about Brainchip don't you think??
Tick fkn Tok
James Quilty on LinkedIn: Australian AI chipmaker rises on US patent grant
Australian AI chipmaker rises on US patent grant: BrainChip gets more backing. #Technology #ITNewswww.linkedin.com
View attachment 40518 View attachment 40519
To my understanding mobile eye is an Intel company. If that helps you.I was listening to an interview with Emad Mostaque and he uses Perplexity rather than ChatGPT or Bing because it gives you sources. So I tried it.
Is Brainchip linked to Mobileye?
Answer
There is no evidence that BrainChip is linked to Mobileye. BrainChip is a semiconductor company that produces ultra-low power, fully digital, event-based, neuromorphic AI IP 2 4
They have recently signed two contracts with Valeo Corporation 1
On the other hand, Mobileye is a company that produces automotive sensor products 3 5
They are known for their EyeQ series of SoCs, which are used in advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) 5 6
While both companies operate in the field of AI and semiconductors, there is no indication that they have any direct business relationship or partnership.
- https://brainchip.com/brainchip-ai-player-on-roll/ 1
- https://static1.squarespace.com/sta...61/BrainChip+initiating+coverage+15+05+19.pdf 2
- https://www.design-reuse.com/news/52660/veriest-mobileye-automotive-sensor.html 3
- https://www.eenewseurope.com/en/brainchip-expands-partners-for-neuromorphic-ai-ip/ 4
- https://www.gardnerweb.com/news/on-tractors-autonomy-and-a-clever-mercedes-concept 5
- https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2021/02/the-rise-and-fall-of-the-adas-promise-now-disrupted-by-avs/ 6
Bloody nice find @Dallas
For those who don't have LinkedIn
View attachment 40516 View attachment 40517
Danilo Pietro Pau on LinkedIn: San Jose using AI to improve pedestrian safety
An awesome/outstanding example of what TinyML enables by connecting its members like Sony (imagers), Infineon Technologies (radar), BrainChip (neural…www.linkedin.com
Epic find.Danilo Pietro Pau on LinkedIn: San Jose using AI to improve pedestrian safety
An awesome/outstanding example of what TinyML enables by connecting its members like Sony (imagers), Infineon Technologies (radar), BrainChip (neural…www.linkedin.com