Damo4
Regular
Waiting for an engineer type to explain to us non-engineer types what they believe it means.........
Are you a fanboy of the technology based on your understanding of it?
Waiting for an engineer type to explain to us non-engineer types what they believe it means.........
This point has been made over 100 times however repeating it does help people with dementiaMaybe stop listening to your own heartbeat and try to understand what is being said. Its the lack of solid commercial progress that I am, and others are, concerned about. The technical and development achievements are outstanding but will all come to nothing if the commercial team cannot execute their task. Thus far, we have not heard anything since Renesas and Megachips that indicates successful commercial engagement.
I am a fan boy of the technology because of its potential applications. That's the only thing that makes a technology successful in the real world. Being a technical/engineering masterpiece does not, in its own right, guarantee success in the market. We should ever be mindful of the VHS/Beta experience as alluded to in the past by our Chair............Are you a fanboy of the technology based on your understanding of it?
Sadly, there are a few on here who have openly stated such and, incredibly, seem proud of the fact.Imagine buying in at 15c or less 7yrs ago and not selling at over $1. While still being in the green right now and having a dig.
Thanks, I was more or less pointing out, and let's use NVISO as an example they are wanting to release a patented product on their end...and the core of It is Brainchips IP...you would want to be 100% confident beforehand what you announce cannot be reversed engineered or copied (within patent laws). Because we failed them, we have IP protection for us and themI think @AARONASX could have a point there?
First in, best dressed, best deal!
Patent means companies after this wanting the latest and greatest AI, would have to go through BRN at a higher fee?
The early companies have a head start & less expense to do it?
I am a fan boy of the technology because of its potential applications. That's the only thing that makes a technology successful in the real world. Being a technical/engineering masterpiece does not, in its own right, guarantee success in the market. We should ever be mindful of the VHS/Beta experience as alluded to in the past by our Chair............
Failed = FiledThanks, I was more or less pointing out, and let's use NVISO as an example they are wanting to release a patented product on their end...and the core of It is Brainchips IP...you would want to be 100% confident beforehand what you announce cannot be reversed engineered or copied (within patent laws). Because we failed them, we have IP protection for us and them
This creates a positive ecosystem with Brainchip and companies they are doing business with.IMO
It'll make sense when a customer signs on the dotted line.........Ill check in tomorrow and the next day etc to see if you still feel the same and if the patent makes sense yet.
Over the next few years, multiple companies such as Google, Meta, and OpenAI/Microsoft will train models on supercomputers worth over one hundred billion dollars. Meta is burning over $16 billion a year on the “Metaverse”, Google waste’s $10 billions a year on a variety of projects that will never come to fruition. Amazon has lost over $50+ billion on Alexa. Cryptocurrencies wasted over $100 billion on nothing of value.
These firms and society in general can and will spend over one hundred billion on creating supercomputers that can train single massive model. These massive models can then be productized in a variety of ways. That effort will be duplicated in multiple counties and companies. It’s the new space race. The difference between those prior wastes and now is that with AI there is tangible value that will come from the short term from human assistants and autonomous agents.
Yep. But hopefully not for long. I’m on an average share price of 92 cents. I just wait and watch.Cute. I am still down 50+% overall.
Weeding and preparing the soil, planting the cover crop, erecting the fencing and bird proofing, generating the compost and installing the irrigation system..........Tech. Are you sure you're not on the BRN payroll? Your posts seem to be very similar to the official company line - buidling partnerships, time lag for developments, intersecting at the correct point in the product cycle, etc., etc.
I am a real fan boy of the technology but, as I've said on a number of occassions, I'm very disappointed with the commercial team's efforts. "Partnerships" don't pay the bills. Published articles do not create revenue. Speaking engagements are much better for enhancing personal profiles than recruiting commitments from prospects. And there's no use having patent protection if you can't monetise the product that's the subject of the patents. Time to put up or shut up Sean and co..
FWIW and my opinions only.
Another example of sounding off when having no clue what you're talking about. I actually sold 100,000 shares at $1.65 (bought at 12c) during the Mercedes excitement but still retain 200,000+. Put the shovel down..........Imagine buying in at 15c or less 7yrs ago and not selling at over $1. While still being in the green right now and having a dig.
Another example of sounding off when having no clue what you're talking about. I actually sold 100,000 shares at $1.65 (bought at 12c) during the Mercedes excitement but still retain 200,000+. Put the shovel down..........
So I'm a miserable sod because I've made some money.........LOLAccording to you, BRN made you $153,000. You still have $24,000 invested, worth around $80,000 @.40c. STFU you miserable sod.
Ill check in tomorrow and the next day etc to see if you still feel the same and if the patent makes sense yet.