I read this Gack's posts he is a bit of a tool. In reality so much is going on with the company it absolutely shocks me. It's quite difficult to estimate a reasonable market cap but I would feel it's north of this. Yeah yeah revenue it's coming in my opinion. The one thing or common theme I see is most companies are pretty tight lipped I don't blame them as it's a pretty competative market and they do not want to give any edge to a competitor.Since I am not a LinkedIn member myself, I can only access some LinkedIn pages but not others and (in those cases I manage to) only see the first two or three comments, whereas reading more would require me to sign in.
So I got to this page, but can only read those first two comments and not access the posters’ personal LinkedIn pages either.
View attachment 38743
Adhering to the TSE forum rules (“Privacy is Key: Don't try to identify or reveal the identity of any other member. Keep discussions within the community anonymous.”), I won‘t make any assumptions on the identity of TSE members.
However, those rules do not prohibit me from scrutinizing LinkedIn members’ names without linking them to TSE usernames.
I am talking about the dubious “Todd Gack” that has been obsessed with downramping BRN over the past couple of weeks. Not hard to guess that he must be shorting BRN, unless you believe he is truly convinced the company is a scam and is altruistically trying to save gullible shareholders from wasting their hard-earned money.
@keyeat already posted two telling screenshots recently:
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-306938
keyeat
Emerged
Someone is not a happy bunny ....
![]()
![]()
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-308582
[SIZE=17px]keyeat[/SIZE]
Emerged
He is at it again
![]()
Can anyone with a LinkedIn account verify this architect named “Todd Gack” is a real person? Or tell me whether it is possible to simply open an account with a fantasy name? A Google search did not yield any evidence of an architect with that name.
I am asking because I am pretty pretty pretty sure I have in fact discovered one of Mickleboro’s alter egos!!! So whoever you are, Ben Pellissier, in the very probable case you are reading this, I think you were spot on with suspecting an MF employee with a hidden agenda!
View attachment 38746
![]()
Todd Gack
Todd Gack was one of Elaine Benes’ boyfriends. His lone episode was “The Calzone”. Todd had a unique way of asking girls out in that he'd make a stupid bet with the loser hosting dinner. Once he lost the bet (i.e. Dustin Hoffman was in Star Wars), he had a dinner date with the female "winner" of...seinfeld.fandom.com
View attachment 38745
I actually ended up watching the whole episode for my “research”!
Well, our Shorter of the Month, if he really is whom I believe him to be, certainly chose an apt alias: Todd Gack is portrayed as a manipulative guy who tricks other people for his own gain and will lie into your face.
Plot excerpt from Wikipedia:
Elaine is taken out to dinner by Todd Gack because he lost a bet with her that Dustin Hoffman was in Star Wars. Jerry believes the bet was spurious, a way of getting a date with Elaine without having to ask her out (and therefore risk being rejected). Todd offers to sell Jerry some Cuban cigars, allowing him to go out to dinner with Elaine again in order to deliver them, but they turn out to be from Peru. Todd continues to insist he is not dating Elaine, even after he takes her to dinner with his parents.
Jerry takes advantage of his beautiful girlfriend Nicki's ability to get anything she wants, including convincing a cop to not give him a speeding ticket, by asking her to convince Todd he shouldn't have to pay for the cigars. However, when Todd sees Nicki he winds up wheedling a dinner with her, leaving Elaine feeling she has been dumped.
Towards the end of the episode, Todd Gack gets knocked down by a giant sock of pennies as payment for the Peruvian cigars he sold Seinfeld as Cuban ones.
Now isn’t that a satisfactory, almost fairy-tale ending? Just think “pennystock” instead of “pennies”… He who laughs last, laughs best.![]()
Not about Brainchip but he does talk about the future of smart phones processing at the edge.![]()
Qualcomm President and CEO Amon on AI: Just at Very Beginning
Qualcomm President and CEO Cristiano Amon discusses generative AI with Bloomberg’s Ed Ludlow at the Bloomberg Technology Summit in San Francisco. (Source: Bloomberg)www.bloomberg.com
Hey @Frangipani I just checked him/her he has only been commenting on Brainchip so you might be right he might be a shorter or downramper.Since I am not a LinkedIn member myself, I can only access some LinkedIn pages but not others and (in those cases I manage to) only see the first two or three comments, whereas reading more would require me to sign in.
So I got to this page, but can only read those first two comments and not access the posters’ personal LinkedIn pages either.
View attachment 38743
Adhering to the TSE forum rules (“Privacy is Key: Don't try to identify or reveal the identity of any other member. Keep discussions within the community anonymous.”), I won‘t make any assumptions on the identity of TSE members.
However, those rules do not prohibit me from scrutinizing LinkedIn members’ names without linking them to TSE usernames.
I am talking about the dubious “Todd Gack” that has been obsessed with downramping BRN over the past couple of weeks. Not hard to guess that he must be shorting BRN, unless you believe he is truly convinced the company is a scam and is altruistically trying to save gullible shareholders from wasting their hard-earned money.
@keyeat already posted two telling screenshots recently:
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-306938
keyeat
Emerged
Someone is not a happy bunny ....
![]()
![]()
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-ongoing.1/post-308582
[SIZE=17px]keyeat[/SIZE]
Emerged
He is at it again
![]()
Can anyone with a LinkedIn account verify this architect named “Todd Gack” is a real person? Or tell me whether it is possible to simply open an account with a fantasy name? A Google search did not yield any evidence of an architect with that name.
I am asking because I am pretty pretty pretty sure I have in fact discovered one of Mickleboro’s alter egos!!! So whoever you are, Ben Pellissier, in the very probable case you are reading this, I think you were spot on with suspecting an MF employee with a hidden agenda!
View attachment 38746
![]()
Todd Gack
Todd Gack was one of Elaine Benes’ boyfriends. His lone episode was “The Calzone”. Todd had a unique way of asking girls out in that he'd make a stupid bet with the loser hosting dinner. Once he lost the bet (i.e. Dustin Hoffman was in Star Wars), he had a dinner date with the female "winner" of...seinfeld.fandom.com
View attachment 38745
I actually ended up watching the whole episode for my “research”!
Well, our Shorter of the Month, if he really is whom I believe him to be, certainly chose an apt alias: Todd Gack is portrayed as a manipulative guy who tricks other people for his own gain and will lie into your face.
Plot excerpt from Wikipedia:
Elaine is taken out to dinner by Todd Gack because he lost a bet with her that Dustin Hoffman was in Star Wars. Jerry believes the bet was spurious, a way of getting a date with Elaine without having to ask her out (and therefore risk being rejected). Todd offers to sell Jerry some Cuban cigars, allowing him to go out to dinner with Elaine again in order to deliver them, but they turn out to be from Peru. Todd continues to insist he is not dating Elaine, even after he takes her to dinner with his parents.
Jerry takes advantage of his beautiful girlfriend Nicki's ability to get anything she wants, including convincing a cop to not give him a speeding ticket, by asking her to convince Todd he shouldn't have to pay for the cigars. However, when Todd sees Nicki he winds up wheedling a dinner with her, leaving Elaine feeling she has been dumped.
Towards the end of the episode, Todd Gack gets knocked down by a giant sock of pennies as payment for the Peruvian cigars he sold Seinfeld as Cuban ones.
Now isn’t that a satisfactory, almost fairy-tale ending? Just think “pennystock” instead of “pennies”… He who laughs last, laughs best.![]()
Not about Brainchip but he does talk about the future of smart phones processing at the edge.
On this slide, Nandan mentions that Akida P (top of the range (out)competes $150 chips for the heavy lifting. So what is the cost of Akida IP for top of the range with a full complement of nodes plus TeNNs plus ViT?
View attachment 38764
Fn: for "GPU" read "Nvidia".
First there was LSTM,
then there was transformers
TeNN sounds like it will be a real winner, enabling the associated processor to offload more of the heavy lifting
yes, He did mention snapdragon and jetson at the slide when talking about the high end part.On this slide, Nandan mentions that Akida P (top of the range (out)competes $150 chips for the heavy lifting. So what is the cost of Akida IP for top of the range with a full complement of nodes plus TeNNs plus ViT?
View attachment 38764
Fn: for "GPU" read "Nvidia".
First there was LSTM,
then there was transformers
TeNN sounds like it will be a real winner, enabling the associated processor to offload more of the heavy lifting
Another piece of the Todd Gack mystery falling into place: after consulting Dr Google once again, it now also makes sense to me why a Seinfeld fan who is pretending to be someone else would pick “architect” as his imaginary job:
View attachment 38767
Just watch the video:
Meanwhile Larry being really uncomfortable…
@TheDrooben: Relax, I don’t suspect Larry to be involved in this, unless this is another “Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde”…
But he could have at least given us a hint as to:
View attachment 38770
On this slide, Nandan mentions that Akida P (top of the range (out)competes $150 chips for the heavy lifting. So what is the cost of Akida IP for top of the range with a full complement of nodes plus TeNNs plus ViT?
View attachment 38764
Fn: for "GPU" read "Nvidia".
First there was LSTM,
then there was transformers
TeNN sounds like it will be a real winner, enabling the associated processor to offload more of the heavy lifting
On the same slide but in the Arm tech talk presentation, our CMO mentioned that we have a agricultural company who is currently using high end edge processor, would achieve 10x cost reduction if use akida plus a smaller cpu such as cortex m85 or cortex A class.On this slide, Nandan mentions that Akida P (top of the range (out)competes $150 chips for the heavy lifting. So what is the cost of Akida IP for top of the range with a full complement of nodes plus TeNNs plus ViT?
View attachment 38764
Fn: for "GPU" read "Nvidia".
First there was LSTM,
then there was transformers
TeNN sounds like it will be a real winner, enabling the associated processor to offload more of the heavy lifting
I love the line everything starts on big CPUs or GPUs but end up on edge processing. That is a testimony to brainchip thinking as well.
Qualcomm uses ARM architectureI love the line everything starts on big CPUs or GPUs but end up on edge processing. That is a testimony to brainchip thinking as well.
On the other hand I am just a bit confused how on chip processing is happening, CNN's, RNNs are available for quit a long time and no other company is able process on chip until brainchip comes out with a concept of snn and on chip processing.
Is that Qualcomm can be our EAP partner or they have similarly technology as snn.
This is a vendetta. For the past month or so he's been constantly posting statements like this under every single Brainchip post on LingedIn. He started addressing the issue on LinkedIn about 5 months ago. And Mickle is a Nvidia fanboy. So yeah, maybe architect Todd Gack doesn't live in New York but right here:
View attachment 38772
The house could be anywhere.)
As much as I hate share manipulation, we can only blame this on the lack of (or delay in) commercial uptake. We gave the shorters a crack in the armour and they have punched their way through.A reminder about share price manipulation:
20230607
Share trader faces jail over ‘pump and dump’ scheme | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site
A Melbourne share trader who used online posts to pump up share prices, then sell them for inflated prices, has become the first person in Australia to be convicted over a “pump and dump” scheme.
Gabriel Govinda, known online as Fibonarchery, used 13 different share trading accounts in the names of friends and relatives to manipulate the share price of 20 different listed stocks, between September 2014 and July 2015.
The 41-year-old traded between the accounts he controlled – known as wash trading – using dummy bids to falsely boost the perceived demand, and ultimately the price, for listed stocks.
He used online posts on hotcrapper to illegally spread information about his wash trades and dummy bids, seeking to pump up share prices, then sell them at a higher price.
In one post he quipped “dummy bids are all part of the fun and games and cat and mouse of the stockmarket!”
Mr Govinda pleaded guilty on Monday to 23 charges of manipulation of listed stocks on the Australian Securities Exchange and 19 of illegal dissemination of information relating to the manipulation.
He faces up to 10 years’ jail on each charge or a fine of up to $765,000, or both.
He is the first person to be convicted of false trading and market rigging, through creating a false or misleading appearance of active trading, under the Corporations Act.
The corporate regulator noted a “concerning trend” of social media posts being used to co-ordinate “pump and dump” schemes, a practice which famously landed Jordan Belfort, the former stockbroker whose story inspired The Wolf of Wall Street film, in jail.
Typically, the activity occurs when a person buys shares in a company and starts an organised program to try and boost the share price, by using social media and online forums to create a sense of excitement in a stock or spread false news about the company’s prospects. They then sell their shares and take a profit, while other shareholders suffer as the share price drops.
“ASIC has recently observed blatant attempts to pump share prices, using posts on social media to announce a target stock, a designated time to buy and a target price or percentage gain to be reached before dumping the shares,” the regulator said.
“In some cases, posts on social media forums may mislead subscribers by suggesting the activity is legal.”
ASIC said it continued to act against this type of market manipulation, which threatened the integrity of markets.
Let's hope ASIC hasn't dropped the ball on shorter manipulation.
A reminder about share price manipulation:
20230607
Share trader faces jail over ‘pump and dump’ scheme | news.com.au — Australia’s leading news site
A Melbourne share trader who used online posts to pump up share prices, then sell them for inflated prices, has become the first person in Australia to be convicted over a “pump and dump” scheme.
Gabriel Govinda, known online as Fibonarchery, used 13 different share trading accounts in the names of friends and relatives to manipulate the share price of 20 different listed stocks, between September 2014 and July 2015.
The 41-year-old traded between the accounts he controlled – known as wash trading – using dummy bids to falsely boost the perceived demand, and ultimately the price, for listed stocks.
He used online posts on hotcrapper to illegally spread information about his wash trades and dummy bids, seeking to pump up share prices, then sell them at a higher price.
In one post he quipped “dummy bids are all part of the fun and games and cat and mouse of the stockmarket!”
Mr Govinda pleaded guilty on Monday to 23 charges of manipulation of listed stocks on the Australian Securities Exchange and 19 of illegal dissemination of information relating to the manipulation.
He faces up to 10 years’ jail on each charge or a fine of up to $765,000, or both.
He is the first person to be convicted of false trading and market rigging, through creating a false or misleading appearance of active trading, under the Corporations Act.
The corporate regulator noted a “concerning trend” of social media posts being used to co-ordinate “pump and dump” schemes, a practice which famously landed Jordan Belfort, the former stockbroker whose story inspired The Wolf of Wall Street film, in jail.
Typically, the activity occurs when a person buys shares in a company and starts an organised program to try and boost the share price, by using social media and online forums to create a sense of excitement in a stock or spread false news about the company’s prospects. They then sell their shares and take a profit, while other shareholders suffer as the share price drops.
“ASIC has recently observed blatant attempts to pump share prices, using posts on social media to announce a target stock, a designated time to buy and a target price or percentage gain to be reached before dumping the shares,” the regulator said.
“In some cases, posts on social media forums may mislead subscribers by suggesting the activity is legal.”
ASIC said it continued to act against this type of market manipulation, which threatened the integrity of markets.
Let's hope ASIC hasn't dropped the ball on shorter manipulation.