D
Deleted member 118
Guest
They must be busy selling t shirts. As it can’t be anything elseAnd how many of these are employees are sales people.
They must be busy selling t shirts. As it can’t be anything elseAnd how many of these are employees are sales people.
Agreed. There was a moment when a question was posed to Sean about why there was no ASX disclosure about Akida 1000 being a failure as this information would have a material impact on the share price.While I do think Sean is doing the right things behind closed doors (apart from shareholder communication on progress), I have never been a fan of his appointment.
His public speaking leaves a lot to be desired imo. Admittedly it would be a very difficult job especially trying to dance around NDAs but one of the essential functions of a ceo is to be the public face of the company and instill confidence in the public on where the company is headed, even when things aren't going right.
He is now, and was when he was appointed, to green for this part of the role imo. He is lacking basic CEO skills.
It is hard to see (although I'm sure there were good reasons at the time) why BRN saw fit to appoint him as CEO, .............and it shouldn't be.
Director of sales would've been a better role for his skill set maybe, but he is clearly trying to play catch up in his role and it shows.
Having said all of that, I believe strongly that results will come over the next 12 months and beyond, but I'm not confident at this point in time that Sean is the right man for the job.
They have told us of none specifically, so zero is the only number that can faithfully be stated.Again, the "NDA wall" seems to have blocked any meaningful answers to the most pressing questions. I feel that a ballpark figure could have been provided at least to assuage some of our concerns. For example, after explaining that everyone the Company deals with signs NDAs, Sean could have added that they were (for example) between 500-1000.
The question that was put in the Q&A by a shareholder( who I can't remember who) that pricked my interest was in a multi question, but "why hasn't any ELT or Director put their hand in their own pockets and purchased additional shares...surely showing some confidence in the company". However unfortunately wasn't answered, or I didn't hear what the answer was.
What does this mean? What a bloody roller coaster this is becoming…
Answered my own question…What does this mean? What a bloody roller coaster this is becoming…
As Sean (hot?) Hehir stated last year, judge him on results rather than effort. His effort, reflected in his presentation, is lacklustre so I'm not surprised at his lack of results. CEO's should possess a kind of anemometer for economic headwinds. The headwinds were blowing last AGM and Hehir still blustered.They have told us of none specifically, so zero is the only number that can faithfully be stated.
I have lost a lot of faith with this management team, especially Sean Heir. I expected better by now.
Answered my own question…
A first strike is triggered when 25% or more of shares are against a company’s remuneration report. If the remuneration report receives dissent votes of 25% or more for two straight years, directors could face re-election.
An NDA is not a way to determine a company's success... Literally every company in this space signs NDAs with each other before they have any conversations, let alone do any business. NDA's usually don't need to be signed by the CEO... so, it's like asking the King how many laws/bills passed in all the commonwealth nations last month... It's an irrelevant figure, but an important document.They have told us of none specifically, so zero is the only number that can faithfully be stated.
I have lost a lot of faith with this management team, especially Sean Heir. I expected better by now.