BRN Discussion Ongoing

alwaysgreen

Top 20
Summary of the AGM:

We have an amazing product but we are struggling to sell it. We have no other information we can provide other than we hope that the generation of Akida will be successful. No promises!

We all knew Akida has struggled commercially based on the last few quarterlies so this is nothing new.

Now it's whether or not we as holders, have the nerve to hold on for the next 12 -18 months to see if Akida 2.0 will actually sell. If it struggles to sell as Akida first gen did, we don't have anything else to offer so it would be lights out for the company.

It's still a big gamble but high risk can come with large rewards. Decisions, decisions.
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
Reactions: 14 users

Lex555

Regular
One comment that Sean made is playing my mind. Perhaps someone with better knowledge in this space can enlighten me... When asked if he knew of any devices currently on the market with Akida onboard, he responded, and I paraphrase, that he did not know and the company wasnt privy to this information from its customers? Did I mishear this? If so I call bullshit. How else would they know how many IP licenses have been sold and what royalties were due?
From my understanding, he said they would know and due to NDA’s we’d find out about it in the financials.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

IloveLamp

Top 20
One comment that Sean made is playing my mind. Perhaps someone with better knowledge in this space can enlighten me... When asked if he knew of any devices currently on the market with Akida onboard, he responded, and I paraphrase, that he did not know and the company wasnt privy to this information from its customers? Did I mishear this? If so I call bullshit. How else would they know how many IP licenses have been sold and what royalties were due?

While I do think Sean is doing the right things behind closed doors (apart from shareholder communication on progress), I have never been a fan of his appointment.

His public speaking leaves a lot to be desired imo. Admittedly it would be a very difficult job especially trying to dance around NDAs but one of the essential functions of a ceo is to be the public face of the company and instill confidence in the public on where the company is headed, even when things aren't going right, or when tough questions are asked......

He is now, and was when he was appointed, too green for this part of the role imo. He is lacking basic CEO skills.

Although I'm sure there were good reasons at the time, It is hard to see why BRN saw fit to appoint him as CEO, ....................and it shouldn't be, it should be obvious.

Director of sales would've been a better role for his skill set maybe, but he is clearly trying to play catch up in his role and it shows.

Having said all of that, I believe strongly that results will come over the next 12 months and beyond, but I'm not confident at this point in time that Sean is the right man for the job.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 30 users

alwaysgreen

Top 20
While I do think Sean is doing the right things behind closed doors (apart from shareholder communication on progress), I have never been a fan of his appointment.

His public speaking like many others leaves a lot to be desired imo. Admittedly it would be a very difficult job especially trying to dance around NDAs but one of the essential functions of a ceo is to be the public face of the company and instill confidence in the public on where the company is headed, even when things aren't going right.

He is now and was when he was appointed, to green for this part of the role. He is lacking basic CEO skills. It is hard to see (although I'm sure there were good reasons at the time) why BRN saw fit to appoint him as CEO.

Director of sales would've been a better role for his skill set maybe, but he is clearly trying to play catch up in his role and it shows.

Having said all of that, I believe strongly that results will come over the next 12 months and beyond, but I'm not confident at this point in time that Sean is the right man for the job.

In regards to his appointment, he looked great on paper and realistically, we didn't/don't have the market power or $$ to pull a high flying CEO.

Sean had never been a CEO previous to his role with Brainchip (he was a VP of business development) so this transition was likely pretty tough for him.

I think he's doing the best he can with the talent around him but I agree with others, that he doesn't seem confident in his delivery and is quite robotic reading his notes. I would like to see him being passionate about Brainchip and his role but as I said, it's a tough gig and understand that nerves can overcome people when public speaking.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 15 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
I can smell another LDA coming sometime this year unless a miracle happens.

 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users

AARONASX

Holding onto what I've got
I managed to watch some of the AGM,

Following along with some other posters semi disgruntled opinion on Sean lack of clear direction/communication regarding future of Brainchip. Some time it's difficult to say what you want to really say when a gag order is in place restricting you from speaking too much too soon

I hope when time permits Sean can more freely speak we see the true him and what management sees in him.

We all want information now... but NDAs are there to protect both parties involved within it.
As the old saying goes 'loose lips sinks ships'

But this is Imo 😂
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 24 users

Mccabe84

Regular
I can smell another LDA coming sometime this year unless a miracle happens.


I was thinking the same. I’m guessing the company didn’t even mention when they expect to brake even?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

Mccabe84

Regular
I managed to watch some of the AGM,

Following along with some other posters semi disgruntled opinion on Sean lack of clear direction/communication regarding future of Brainchip. Some time it's difficult to say what you want to really say when a gag order is in place restricting you from speaking too much too soon

I hope when time permits Sean can more freely speak we see the true him and what management sees in him.

We all want information now... but NDAs are there to protect both parties involved within it.
As the old saying goes 'loose lips sinks ships'

But this is Imo 😂
Couldn’t NDA’s also be a marketing term to create interest?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
Going on what people are saying and if your reading this Sean

 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

Quatrojos

Regular
Going on what people are saying and if your reading this Sean


Hehir had 15h in business class from LA to Sydney to focus on his presentation. He came across like a school student reading a late assignment...
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Sad
Reactions: 11 users
In regards to his appointment, he looked great on paper and realistically, we didn't/don't have the market power or $$ to pull a high flying CEO.

Sean had never been a CEO previous to his role with Brainchip (he was a VP of business development) so this transition was likely pretty tough for him.

I think he's doing the best he can with the talent around him but I agree with others, that he doesn't seem confident in his delivery and is quite robotic reading his notes. I would like to see him being passionate about Brainchip and his role but as I said, it's a tough gig and understand that nerves can overcome people when public speaking.
we didn't/don't have the market power or $$ to pull a high flying CEO.

We paid him $4.5M last year! Thats a ridiculous salary/performance incentive package for where Brainchip is currently at.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 28 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
Hehir had 15h in business class from LA to Sydney to focus on his presentation. He came across like a school student reading a late assignment...
I could have probably done a better job and I’m a mute
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
Guess we never found out how many extra staff we now have doing such a wonderful job for us shareholders
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users

Quatrojos

Regular
I could have probably done a better job and I’m a mute
Could his five-year plan be, at least in part, a strategy to keep himself employed for all of that time?
 
  • Like
  • Thinking
  • Haha
Reactions: 10 users

alwaysgreen

Top 20
we didn't/don't have the market power or $$ to pull a high flying CEO.

We paid him $4.5M last year! Thats a ridiculous salary/performance incentive package for where Brainchip is currently at.
Agreed but at the time people were calling for the head of Intel ($11.6 mill USD), ARM ($17 mill USD) etc

I agree $4.5 mill is still a tonne of cash!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

suss

Regular
Guess we never found out how many extra staff we now have doing such a wonderful job for us shareholders
And how many of these are employees are sales people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
Could his five-year plan be, at least in part, a strategy to keep himself employed for all of that time?
If we don’t see any deals in the next 6 months I think he should do the rightful thing, then again sod that it probably cost us another 8,000,000 shares

 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 8 users

Rskiff

Regular
The question that was put in the Q&A by a shareholder( who I can't remember who) that pricked my interest was in a multi question, but "why hasn't any ELT or Director put their hand in their own pockets and purchased additional shares...surely showing some confidence in the company". However unfortunately wasn't answered, or I didn't hear what the answer was. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
This is a question I guess will get an email about later:

I was wondering if the company can look at using the 'non price sensitive' announcement section on the ASX by announcing how many companies are engaging in Brainchip's Akida and in what product areas / geographical location and industries? In this way, as shareholders we have an idea of how hard working the company is, but also without compromising partnerships we have.

I guess that this AGM made me aware that links we have found with companies who publicly announce how ‘great’ we are, will probably not end up as IP contract signatures seeing they may love our tech, but are unlikely to adopt it seeing they are singing our praises. Our dot joining with organisations that don't sing our praises are more likely to get through.

Also Viana reiterated that we are still in development/introduction stage. Many of us investors have to change our time horizons, although many of us here knew that a while ago.

Content with the AGM. I am glad there was humility shown with an undercurrent of optimism. Didn't agree with some questions. The guy who said he was a CEO and doesn't understand why we don't have revenue forecasts I thought was dealt well with by Sean. I would've lost my shit. This guy doesn't understand at all how tech companies operate.

Viana speaks well and is very likeable. I like how he explained why they don't announce partnerships. He explains concepts well.

I have felt really bored wth the company lately, but I know as an investor this is the time to buy if I had the funds.

But mostly I am happy that our CEO has seemed to have morphed into Christopher Walken but with a ponytail.
If he does the 'Weapon of Choice' Fatboy Slim dance, I will sell our unit to buy more shares.


View attachment 37075 View attachment 37074
I was wondering if the company can look at using the 'non price sensitive' announcement section on the ASX by announcing how many companies are engaging in Brainchip's Akida and in what product areas / geographical location and industries? In this way, as shareholders we have an idea of how hard working the company is, but also without compromising partnerships we have.

If they can announce a new partnership via their twitter, then they can release it via the ASX as non price sensitive. They choose not to do that. Why, I have no idea. Id like to see an update on all those parnterships. Are they still on board? Whats happening with them? But, theyll hide behind NDA's again.

I still believe in the product, but man, things need to change and fast.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 8 users

TECH

Regular
I liked the complete honesty today. (As far as they can be)
There is recognition, at last, that the company was rudderless in terms of commercialisation previously. I think if you have been invested a long time and don't have rose tinted glasses that was obvious.
I am convinced by Antonio, I am not entirely convinced by Sean. He seems much more comfortable talking about the technology and ecosystems but the rest of the CEO's role, not so much.
Both Antonio and Sean clearly expressed their frustration at the current state of affairs. Both must have had their eyes opened leading upto last years AGM, but could not say it. It is also clear that whilst Akida 1.0 is good, we had not really engaged with prospective customers to see if that is what they wanted - hence another 6-9 month delay to a major uptake of the technology. Having said that, without Akida 1.0 we would not have known what we now know, so a small silver lining.
My thoughts are that if Megachips was in on the back end design, then they have customers who want the technology as designed, so once testing is complete, we may see some adoption from their customers, BUT, we wont know about it until revenue comes in.
The good news is that portability and scalability has been proven, so hopefully the timeline of 2 - 4 years to adopt the technology is now reduced and we should see more IP licences in the next 12 - 24 months.

I would love to hear our Director of Sales speak about the technology and what he is finding in the market place - it is his job to close the deal so to speak.
Overall, the company is a hold for me, for another 18 months, but with the expectation of more positive momentum, which will include more partnerships and some IP licences, with significant revenue to follow.

Clearly just my opinion. You should form your own.

Hi Doc, I agree with most of what you have commented on.

I thought Antonio was excellent, great speaker, very clear, very precise, balanced views with integrity, he come across as very genuine, very knowledgeable, honest and really painted a picture of exactly where we are positioned, he certainly didn't sugarcoat anything, no fluff.

His 30+ years in this industry shone through, spoke with confidence, Sean on the other hand is a lot less comfortable, or appears to be, but behind the scenes I believe that he has done an excellent job in basically restructuring the company, the word talent was mentioned numerous times, hiring talent in this field (neuromorphic) is clearly extremely hard, stopping just short of saying "poaching" talent from other big players in the tech industry.

As I have harped on a little, it's the IP Licenses we need to secure, that change in direction when Sean came onboard was done for a reason, but it was reassuring to hear that the company has acknowledged the IP runway is a lot longer than many within the company initially thought.

Close on 40% voting against Motion 8 may not seem important, but the message it sent was the whole point of voting No, my gut feeling was
correct that something wasn't quite right, you only had to listen to Ken and watch his body language, the words, argument, put it behind us, we basically got out of it cheaply, could have been a lot worse, basically making the best out of a bad situation.

Interestingly, Steve Liebeskind got up and spoke on the motion, Steve was obviously on the Board before Antonio and Sean and knows exactly
how things played out when "Chief 3 Hats" was running the show, a lot of "mates" where brought onboard at the time from memory, and paid
and rewarded handsomely, despite the opposition of many shareholders at the time.

Neil Rinaldi was other to speak up on Motion 8 having also been an Non-Executive Board member.

What I didn't personally like was the comment from the floor that I'll see you guys later (Sean/Antonio/Ken) and explain it a bit more for you, as in the background of Manny's arrangement with Lou....purely my opinion not anyone elses.

AKD 3 to be documented before AKD 2 is made publicly available, which we have been told would be around the September/October time frame, please correct me if I mis heard that comment from Sean.

Overall, not super exciting, but it's steady as she goes, just keep putting one foot in front of the other.

On your point about hearing from Chris Stevens, about 3 weeks ago I contacted both Peter and Rob together politely asking that Chris be interviewed by Rob on his podcast series, so we could actually hear from the man himself at the coalface so to speak, maybe they will consider it moving forward.

Cheers from Perth.........Tech (y)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 39 users
Top Bottom