Hi Learning
Great pickup, other listeners noticed it also.
You're correct. There are no publicly available demonstrations of akida running on a Valeo concept.
If we go back a year or two Valeo did a presentation/demonstration on their Scala 3 LiDaR concept. During that presentation, one of the viewers (undoubtedly a shareholder of Brainchip) submitted a question asking the presenters if they were using akida. The host of the presentation innocently asked that question and the two presenters hesitated, looked at each other, kind of laughed/smiled and then said words to the effect of 'we are not ready (or not here) to talk about our partners'.
It was very telling at the time and this forum lit up with people having a laugh and assuming that akida was all but assured to be Valeo's chosen technology for their LiDaR purely based on the presenters response and demeanour when answering/avoiding the question.
Since then, I don't think there have been any addition dots joining akida/Scala 3 LiDaR together, until now.
It is possible Nandan has let slip a biggie.
How big? Well, Valeo has already registered orders for their technology in excess of $1B, so very big. Company making big.
I know you're a hard man to please based purely on your daily comments on this forum.What is our cut of the $1 billion?
1% is $10 million - not really a company maker but a good start!
3% - getting there.
Unfortunately, we don't have the figures for this. Also, we don't have a signed license agreement with Valeo yet. Hopefully an announcement prior to production?
I know you're a hard man to please based purely on your daily comments on this forum.
Consider this, Brainchip would benefit strongly from akida being implemented into a very significant product. We've had Mercedes say we're the bees knees, but akida still isn't in the market in a product that gives that final stamp of approval to confirm akida is the real deal. We still have people like shareman gallavanting around HC telling people our CEO has confirmed no one wants our technology with impunity.
LiDaR technology is cutting edge. It'll be an extremely big and rapidly growing market by 2030, probably even sooner.
If akida is at the forefront of Valeo's entry into that market the impact of akida's involvement will be more to Brainchip than just the revenue coming out of that involvement.
You should start thinking about the bigger picture.
I know you're a hard man to please based purely on your daily comments on this forum.
Consider this, Brainchip would benefit strongly from akida being implemented into a very significant product. We've had Mercedes say we're the bees knees, but akida still isn't in the market in a product that gives that final stamp of approval to confirm akida is the real deal. We still have people like shareman gallavanting around HC telling people our CEO has confirmed no one wants our technology with impunity.
LiDaR technology is cutting edge. It'll be an extremely big and rapidly growing market by 2030, probably even sooner.
If akida is at the forefront of Valeo's entry into that market the impact of akida's involvement will be more to Brainchip than just the revenue coming out of that involvement.
You should think about the bigger picture.
Please point out where I said akida is in Valeo's LiDaR.Please don't tell me how to think.
I'm a huge supporter and cheerleader for Brainchip and hold more shares than I probably should. I sold 9% of my holding at $2.13 but haven't sold another on the way down.
I'm just referring to your comment that our involvement with Valeos $1 billion order (which is currently not confirmed to be us), is company making. That is extremely misleading given the likely royalties would be in the vicinity of 1 or 2 percent (happy to be proven wrong). It wouldn't even cover our current outgoings.
I'm all for supporting Brainchip but throwing out comments like that could cause an uninformed investor to splash their hard earned on pure speculation.
For me it's the glass half full thing. We had a presentation with ARM. Who would have taken that as a given a year ago? No matter how quick or how cogent. It's always too slow or boring for some. It was a first presentation. Maybe a second round will come and then off to the workshop and practical examples?So all hype and nothing more than usual? Just woke up and haven't watched presentation yet. But based on comments here, seems not much news or rocket fuel was provided.
Guess the moon and retirement have to wait another week
Nvidia's share price is about $AU400, and its market cap about $AU1 trillion. I think BRN has a lot more headroom.Quite aside from anything else, interesting thoughts from Stanley Druckenmiller in the AFR today.
Stanley ran money for George Soros for a decade and is said to have made more than a 30 per cent gross return for 30 years until he closed his firm Duquesne Capital to outside capital in 2010, had plenty of gold at the Sohn conference in New York on Tuesday night.
Happily, Druckenmiller said the hard landing will throw up interesting investment ideas for the patient with artificial intelligence chief among them.
“You’re going to have unbelievable opportunities in the next couple of years. There’s a lot of dispersion within industries, and just make sure to preserve your capital until they present themselves,” he says.
His family office is long on Microsoft and AI chipmaker Nvidia, which Druckenmiller suggests looks all but recession-proof given its leverage to the AI revolution.
“I actually think there is a very, very real possibility it could be every bit as impactful as the internet.”
Hi to all,
maybe of interest for some of you: "Mobileye does not apply for approval for autonomous driving"
excerpt: "Mobileye, the Israeli subsidiary of U.S. chipmaker Intel, will not seek approval for an autonomous driving vehicle. Handelsblatt learned this as part of the federally supported pilot project "AI-based Regular Operation of Autonomous On-Demand Transport" (Kira).
The project was intended to transport a total of 15 self-driving cars in public transport as a shuttle service for the first time worldwide. Some of the vehicles were to operate in Darmstadt, the others in Offenbach. In order to use such vehicles, type approval from the German Federal Motor Transport Authority is mandatory.
The Federal Ministry of Transport confirmed corresponding information about the setback for autonomous driving. The ministry was "informed about this decision," a spokesman told Handelsblatt. "This decision is a corporate decision, the reasons are not known to the ministry.""
at the same time: "Porsche concludes comprehensive cooperation with Mobileye"
excerpt "The Volkswagen Group is expanding its cooperation with the Israeli Intel subsidiary Mobileye. The tech company will produce driver assistance systems in series with sports car manufacturer Porsche in the future, both companies announced on Tuesday. Currently, the VW Group is already cooperating with Mobileye on automatic lane keeping and changing.
Through the new cooperation, Porsche intends to offer automated assistance as well as navigation functions, also known in technical jargon as Level 2+ of automated driving. In this level, drivers are allowed to take their hands off the steering wheel, but must continue to keep their eyes on the road to be able to intervene at any time."
Automatisiertes Fahren: Porsche schließt umfassende Kooperation mit Mobileye
Mit dem israelischen Tech-Unternehmen setzt Porsche auf einen konzernbekannten Partner. In der Belegschaft macht man sich Sorgen über Ähnlichkeit mit anderen Kooperationen.www.handelsblatt.com
https://news.yahoo.com/porsche-taps-mobileye-automated-driving-110052245.html
Please point out where I said akida is in Valeo's LiDaR.
I've highlighted some key words for you below to assist with reinterpreting my post.
The one requirement for it to be company making would be that akida needs to be involved. I did not say it was and I don't think I need to point out that akidas involvement is a requirement as it is blindingly obvious that is the case.
"It was very telling at the time and this forum lit up with people having a laugh and assuming that akida was all but assured to be Valeo's chosen technology for their LiDaR purely based on the presenters response and demeanour when answering/avoiding the question.
Since then, I don't think there have been any addition dots joining akida/Scala 3 LiDaR together, until now.
It is possible Nandan has let slip a biggie."
Edit: Re your 9% holding at $2.13, that does suck. I have been buying on the way down when I've felt there's value in buying. I think the most I've paid is in the 90s but it was a small amount. I've always had the attitude that I'm buying this for the long term and that any shares bought under $1 will be considered 'good buying' when we fast forward to the future and see where Brainchip goes. If Brainchip achieves the success I personally believe it'll achieve, your $2.13 shares will be good buying also.
Brainchip won't "be successful" and remain a $1 share forever.
It'll either fail completely or succeed significantly. I don't think there's an in-between for a company like Brainchip.
Please point out where I said akida is in Valeo's LiDaR.
I've highlighted some key words for you below to assist with reinterpreting my post.
The one requirement for it to be company making would be that akida needs to be involved. I did not say it was and I don't think I need to point out that akidas involvement is a requirement as it is blindingly obvious that is the case.
"It was very telling at the time and this forum lit up with people having a laugh and assuming that akida was all but assured to be Valeo's chosen technology for their LiDaR purely based on the presenters response and demeanour when answering/avoiding the question.
Since then, I don't think there have been any addition dots joining akida/Scala 3 LiDaR together, until now.
It is possible Nandan has let slip a biggie."
Edit: Re your 9% holding at $2.13, that does suck. I have been buying on the way down when I've felt there's value in buying. I think the most I've paid is in the 90s but it was a small amount. I've always had the attitude that I'm buying this for the long term and that any shares bought under $1 will be considered 'good buying' when we fast forward to the future and see where Brainchip goes. If Brainchip achieves the success I personally believe it'll achieve, your $2.13 shares will be good buying also.
Brainchip won't "be successful" and remain a $1 share forever.
It'll either fail completely or succeed significantly. I don't think there's an in-between for a company like Brainchip.
And yes I am a hard man to please
Who is saying otherwise??? I just said that the $1 billion order for Valeo is not a company maker for Brainchip.Valeo is potentially a huge deal for Brainchip. Not sure why anyone would be saying otherwise ...mmm