You're entitled to your own opinion Diogenese.
The reason I think it's a "buddy" deal, is because I think it's likely he didn't have a million dollars in free capital to exercise the options at the time.
How could him not exercising the options and giving the Company a million dollars, possibly be in the best interests of the Company, or its shareholders?
The reason of tax selling was given.
At no time in the Company’s past, has it given consideration, to what the selling of shares (LDN for example) would do to the share price.
It's just been a case of "Well that's the Market".
@MDhere, he will have to sell a hunk almost immediately, to cover his tax, for the same reasons as the Company was supposedly protecting us from, when the share price was much higher.
The argument that this is not dilution by the Company, because the options were already granted, is baseless, as they were granted on the basis of providing the Company, with a million dollars in funds. There was also no certainty that all options would be exercised, which is completely different from the granting of the RSUs.
Now they are just a gift.
@Cirat, the whole idea, that Emmanuel Hernandez has a claim against the Company, doesn't gel with me, when it was outside normal circumstances, for the treating of the options.
His "favor" to the Company of not exercising, simply does not make sense.