wilzy123
Founding Member
Up down up down , means bugger all
Up down up down , means bugger all
I too talked with Tony about the weather. I asked if the skies are clear, he said they are more than clear - they are sunny, sprinkled with sprites and framed with a glorious rainbow.Sorry David, as hard as I tried I just couldn’t work out what you were saying/implying?
Funny you should say that years ago went to a wedding and a couple on our table were from Perth and all they could talk about all night was the weather in Perth. Must be a WA thing.I too talked with Tony about the weather. I asked if the skies are clear, he said they are more than clear - they are sunny, sprinkled with sprites and framed with a glorious rainbow.
Talking with Tony about the weather was the best part of the night.
Maybe the WA residents mastered the art of shrouding sensitive information in weather metaphors. :-DFunny you should say that years ago went to a wedding and a couple on our table were from Perth and all they could talk about all night was the weather in Perth. Must be a WA thing.![]()
FF , When you are next conversing with Tony , please ask him his thoughts on wether he thinks the share price will be $5.00 or wether it will be $10.00 any time next year . Don’t be sheepish in getting an answer out of him .Funny you should say that years ago went to a wedding and a couple on our table were from Perth and all they could talk about all night was the weather in Perth. Must be a WA thing.![]()
I don’t think that is a fair comment actually. If new information comes to light after the last know fact it has reason for investigation. As a retired lawyer surely this is not an unfamiliar concept.I would say yes to your question you are reading too much into this. Simple logic based on known facts.
AKIDA is the only commercial SNN available as IP. AKIDA IP is so advanced it is science fiction. So if for example AKIDA was producing 96% accuracy with Prophesee's event based vision sensor it is a long way ahead of anything out there and yet is 4% short of 100% accuracy. This missing 4% allows for a statement regarding whether they have found the optimal solution without telling an untruth.
The other thing however is that if AKIDA is producing 96% today just like it was first producing 94% with NaNose this level of accuracy will increase over time. In Nanose it increased to on various reports 96% to 98% accuracy which was over a year ago now so who knows what has been achieved since then. So with incremental learning and fine tuning 96% today could be 98% tomorrow or 100%. At 100% there would be no room to suggest it was not optimal.
On the speculative side of the equation do not forget that both Prophesee and AKIDA are working with NASA and DARPA and some pretty secret research is being undertaken across these two bodies with respect to hypersonic missile tracking. If this old technophobe can work out that event based vision and AKIDA provide the avenue for finding and tracking hypersonic missiles highly intelligent techies working for foreign governments would have worked it out and so there would be a lot of pressure on both companies to be circumspect about what they say at this stage.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Sorry for having a contrary view to you. I will try not to post other than in agreement with you in future.I don’t think that is a fair comment actually. If new information comes to light after the last know fact it has reason for investigation. As a retired lawyer surely this is not an unfamiliar concept.
I want Brainchip to succeed as much as anyone. I have mostly all investment riding on it and it’s a risk I’m willing to take based on my research and risk profile between me and my wife.
So when I heard him say that he doesn’t think the right processing architecture is available yet I found it as new information I was previously unaware of and worthy of a question being raised. Does that mean I am now fairfull and have changed my opinion on Brainchip, not at all. But as far as I’m concerned only one of the statements can be true, and they are quite opposite in nature. So is Akida the golden key to unlock the future of Prophesee or is it a processing architecture that doesn’t meet its expectations?
Was just having a look at this paper again and found the full original which is attached for anyone to have a look at.
@FullmoonfeverWas just having a look at this paper again and found the full original which is attached for anyone to have a look at.
Appears some promise in the project but still work to do to refine.
One thing I did pick up is that with the Cyber-Neuro RT project, which we were also being utilised in from memory, the Authors note they now have access to the INRC (11), presumably to compliment the project research with Akida?
View attachment 23117
View attachment 23118
View attachment 23119
All credit to @Sirod69 who spotted the initial LinkedIn (I think) reference to it and posted several days ago & then @Rise from the ashes managed to get some initial snips.@Fullmoonfever
This is a terrific find and having read the paper the following table makes clear the AKIDA technology advantage. Traditional Von Neumann deep learning CNN from Nvidia cost $30,000. AKIDA science fiction $50.00 estimated.
Which technology provides an opportunity to have hand held devices proliferate? Seems pretty clear to Blind Freddie.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
View attachment 23120
Blue sky minesMaybe the WA residents mastered the art of shrouding sensitive information in weather metaphors. :-D
Ironic if you consider that the weather here hardly changes...
None-the-less you found and posted the paper. BUT many thanks to @Sirod69 and @Rise from the ashes.All credit to @Sirod69 who spotted the initial LinkedIn (I think) reference to it and posted several days ago & then @Rise from the ashes managed to get some initial snips.
I just managed to find the full paper to be able to read and post.
It will be clear in the future. For now we can notice that this is something new. And as we know, people like new things.I don’t think that is a fair comment actually. If new information comes to light after the last know fact it has reason for investigation. As a retired lawyer surely this is not an unfamiliar concept.
I want Brainchip to succeed as much as anyone. I have mostly all investment riding on it and it’s a risk I’m willing to take based on my research and risk profile between me and my wife.
So when I heard him say that he doesn’t think the right processing architecture is available yet I found it as new information I was previously unaware of and worthy of a question being raised. Does that mean I am now fairfull and have changed my opinion on Brainchip, not at all. But as far as I’m concerned only one of the statements can be true, and they are quite opposite in nature. So is Akida the golden key to unlock the future of Prophesee or is it a processing architecture that doesn’t meet its expectations? But can this company succeed better than Kosmonaut Casino? I'm not sure. I recently found this online casino here - https://betpokies.com/reviews/kosmonaut-casino - I read the review and I liked everything. Have you tried it? I recommend.
Whatever you can imagine, Akida can do it!Thanks Mt & Dio.
I will stop imagine things.
Learning
Architecture does not mean, only Akida or another solution. Architecture is the complete suite of solutions used for any purpose, just an FYI for the non techies out there. In this case, when they say the architecture has not been identified it means they are exploring more options !with! Akida most likely as there is nothing better than what Akida does they are not going to be looking in this area for a solutionHe said: “but I’m not sure if the optimal processing architecture has been identified yet” Very strange thing to say when Luca Verre spoke so highly of Brainchip and Akida and the recent partnership etc. am I reading too much into this?
Some of my best friends are sand gropers. (hmmm ... that makes it sound like I've got more than one) ... I know a person who is a sand groper and used to be my best friend (when we were more than $1.00).Funny you should say that years ago went to a wedding and a couple on our table were from Perth and all they could talk about all night was the weather in Perth. Must be a WA thing.![]()
Tonys Reply:FF , When you are next conversing with Tony , please ask him his thoughts on wether he thinks the share price will be $5.00 or wether it will be $10.00 any time next year . Don’t be sheepish in getting an answer out of him .
Thanks @Fullmoonfever ,@FJ-215
Thanks for kind words.
Will try explain a few things below and provide some poss supp / resist visuals you can use as a guide.
@Foxdog
Love the Heineken Asahi word play
Though, the HA candles are still ok so far.
As simple as I can explain.
The HA candles use a diff calculation and are based over 2 candles (averages) & filters a lot of noise so smoother for trend / reversals.
Long body, long upper wick more bullish. Bulls pushing it up.
Long body, long lower wick more bearish. Bears pushing down.
Shorter bodies with top & bottom wicks poss pause, indecision as bulls / bears fight (bit of equilibrium). Watch for change.
So, currently, the recent HA candles are stronger bullish though wicks a little short as we hit into a poss resist area.
Would like to clear this zone but do need watch for any candle body shortening or doji around this level next week if we can't.
Anyway, I use a number of diff charts / indicators as there are certain one I favour more but can't all on one chart so I look for correlations between various indicators / supp & resist levels as most indicators have slightly diff formulas, data sources etc and finding correlations between them provides me a little more confidence on what I'm looking at.
I get they can appear a bit busy, complex or confusing and if any questions, just ask. If looking at lower indicators, look at their movement then vertically above to the what the SP / Bar did...they are related obviously.
I can always just strip one back to only show a couple maybe key thoughts based on what I've already looked at on the other charts.
Charting & Fundamentals go hand & hand imo.
Charting imo is essentially a visual representation of how the mkt (buyers / sellers) react at certain levels, with certain news flow, released or perceived / known as coming. Explosive moves (like Merc) obviously happen when unexpected...good or bad.
A lot of people try to think it is forward looking crystal ball dark magic stuff haha...but basically to look at a chart....LOOK LEFT then RIGHT.
It is not an exact science as it is dealing with human emotions (other the effing bots) and other variables, like Mkt Makers painting the tape etc.
Human nature being what it is, if you can identify certain moves or reactions left then can start to draw some probabilities for current / future situations.
So, a few charts D & a Wkly (couple posted prev) and I've tried to provide some basic info on the indicators and if you look at all then you can start to see certain levels / areas across all.
Higher 70's / 80 as pointed out the other day, around 90 next up etc.
Remembering supply vol comes from sellers & buyers either need hold a level & absorb then move up or if the smart money are in, then they may be able to assist push through supply.
Simplest charting to learn & is worthwhile imo is supp / resist, trendlines, moving averages (common) & maybe some basic patterns like channels, flags / pennants & triangles. General rule is prev support can become future resist & vice versa.
Good w/end all.
View attachment 22921
View attachment 22922
View attachment 22923
View attachment 22924
View attachment 22925