Or if he knows AKIDA 2.0 under a different name
BRN Discussion Ongoing
- Thread starter TechGirl
- Start date
alwaysgreen
Top 20
alwaysgreen
Top 20
His post has quite a few likes from people at Intel.
If it was Akida, surely there would be a "like" from Rob?
If it was Akida, surely there would be a "like" from Rob?
Lex555
Regular
Iām waiting to hear back from Shareman as to his thoughts on this new startup chipbrain, rumours on the internal net is that it might have loihi IP and is very high powered, Iām talking sparks coming from the chip kind of stuff
Shadow59
Regular
He came from Intel and has friends still there.
Lex555
Regular
Thatās a very intriguing response, in fact Iād say thatās a non-denial denial. He could have said a flat no but, instead said ānot that oneā. So he didnāt say an out and out no, but just a no to what weāre alluding to being Akida 1.0. This way heās being evasive but not lying.
My guess its Akida 1.5 with LSTM.
equanimous
Norse clairvoyant shapeshifter goddess
Fact Finder
Top 20
What can we say with certainty:
1. Brainchipās AKIDA1.0 is a neuromorphic processor.
2. Anil Mankar stated last year it was more efficient and faster than a GPU.
3. He has said āNot that one.ā Meaning not that neuromorphic processor.
4. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that whatever he is referring to is a neuromorphic processor.
Who apart from Brainchip has a neuromorphic processor that can compete with AKIDA 1.0 and out perform a GPU.
The only one I am aware of is Loihi 2 and it is still a research chip.
Intel was previously working with Mercedes Benz before the arrival of Brainchip.
He is former Intel.
If he is referring to Loihi 2 it is of academic interest because we know AKIDA1.0 exceeds the Loihi 2 performance.
If he is referring to AKIDA2.0 which he knows by some other name he does no more than confirm what Anil Mankar told the World last year at the Ai Field Day about AKIDA technology saying:
āBecause (we) do computations neuromorphic it is a clear advantage over deep learning GPUsā¦a quick comparison between (our) neuromorphic chipā¦and GPUsā¦(we) can work in microwatts to milli watts while deep learning GPUs are using 100ās of wattsā¦(our) neuromorphic chipā¦ can run much faster, we are running at 300Mhz but the circuits can go to 1Ghzā¦ā
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
1. Brainchipās AKIDA1.0 is a neuromorphic processor.
2. Anil Mankar stated last year it was more efficient and faster than a GPU.
3. He has said āNot that one.ā Meaning not that neuromorphic processor.
4. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that whatever he is referring to is a neuromorphic processor.
Who apart from Brainchip has a neuromorphic processor that can compete with AKIDA 1.0 and out perform a GPU.
The only one I am aware of is Loihi 2 and it is still a research chip.
Intel was previously working with Mercedes Benz before the arrival of Brainchip.
He is former Intel.
If he is referring to Loihi 2 it is of academic interest because we know AKIDA1.0 exceeds the Loihi 2 performance.
If he is referring to AKIDA2.0 which he knows by some other name he does no more than confirm what Anil Mankar told the World last year at the Ai Field Day about AKIDA technology saying:
āBecause (we) do computations neuromorphic it is a clear advantage over deep learning GPUsā¦a quick comparison between (our) neuromorphic chipā¦and GPUsā¦(we) can work in microwatts to milli watts while deep learning GPUs are using 100ās of wattsā¦(our) neuromorphic chipā¦ can run much faster, we are running at 300Mhz but the circuits can go to 1Ghzā¦ā
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
alwaysgreen
Top 20
I love everyone trying to positively spin this but he said it wasn't Akida. Pretty cut and dry to me.
I hope you are all correct and I am just a sad old pessimist!
I hope you are all correct and I am just a sad old pessimist!
He doesn't say that what he is reading is better than Akida.
Fullmoonfever
Top 20
Well, without company confirmation then we all just guessing unfortunately.
Personally can't see how NDA involved given relationship with BRN and MB already outed by MB but yet no formal agreement Ann'd as yet.
One that could be is GrAI?
They had previously been noted by BRN as one of the closer competitors....not necessarily better...just closer.
www.graimatterlabs.ai
Personally can't see how NDA involved given relationship with BRN and MB already outed by MB but yet no formal agreement Ann'd as yet.
One that could be is GrAI?
They had previously been noted by BRN as one of the closer competitors....not necessarily better...just closer.
Technology | GrAI Matter Labs
www.graimatterlabs.ai
toasty
Regular
Mercedes is not a brand that chops and changes. It finds/invents the best technologies and work with them for the long term. That's what their F1 involvement is about for example. Now if we accept that, then the fact they have recently stated that Brainchip are the AI experts and they are working with us to bring to production the kinds of systems deployed in the EQXX it follows that the tweet could not be about anything other than Brainchip product - by whatever name. Think about it. Would Mercedes trumpet Brainchip as the best AI they can find then within months go off in another direction?????
Shadow59
Regular
I think what we have to take from this is that we know how much is involved to bring a new idea to something operational. To me it looks like he is talking about a theory. How long has it taken to get Akida to where it is now? They will be up for that to start with, then they will need to produce an operational chip, assuming they can. In the mean time what would Mercedes do sit around and wait? I don't think so!
Lex555
Regular
Iām putting a logical spin on it. Happy to hear other possibilities of competitors, so I donāt flush money down the toilet
Similar threads
