David holland
Regular
It gave him 40 years of life ,when he should of been locked up in his primeOff topic.
Chris Dawson found guilty of killing his wife 40 years ago the law finally caught up with him.
As the say crime doesn't pay........
It gave him 40 years of life ,when he should of been locked up in his primeOff topic.
Chris Dawson found guilty of killing his wife 40 years ago the law finally caught up with him.
As the say crime doesn't pay........
Guess if want to get a perspective for Renesas products through one supplier.“ With its upcoming RA8 MCUs, Renesas predicts it will finally overtake the competition with the most advanced Arm core on the MCU market.”
This describes and illustrates the problems associated with creating sparsity using conventional hardware and CNNs to connect to event based cameras (square pegs and round holes). Benosman’s article about this problem and how Prophesee were looking for a new processor to resolve the issue (convention hardware could not), lead to a partnership with BrainChip. AIMO.Excuse me Sir I think you dropped something back there.
“ With its upcoming RA8 MCUs, Renesas predicts it will finally overtake the competition with the most advanced Arm core on the MCU market.”
2018 | Cortex-M35P |
2020 | Cortex-M55 |
2022 | Cortex-M85 |
Brainchip rely on the share register Boardroom to provide the list of top 20.Ok, this has got me confused.
The top 20 shareholders list as per last announcement on 1AUG22 is:
View attachment 15431
On the MSN Money website, it shows Brainchip ownership by Mutual Fund:
View attachment 15426
And also ownership of Brainchip shares by Institutions:
View attachment 15427
I'm not sure how current the data is on the MSN website, but these 2 lists are totally different to that shown on the Top 20 Shareholders list. Would anyone have any suggestions as to what insight the lists from the MSN website give us?
(I presume all these other entities hold BRN shares, which is good!)
For mine the simple diagram and specs on the BRN website shows no specific M class and does not differentiate so I take that can be applied to any M class or should state M4/F or could be misleading so I'll take any M.I personally do not think it is ambiguous.
Anil Mankar, Peter van der Made, Rob Telson, Ken Scarince, Jerome Nadel and Sean Hehir have all stated the AKIDA neural fabric is processor and sensor agnostic.
The ARM Cortex M 4 is only on the AKD1000 chip to run the peripherals which allows an IP customer to use AKIDA with what ever processor it is already running.
So as I say no confusion in my mind.
So is ARM confused or is ARM deliberately with Brainchip running interference for existing customers like Renesas so that some uncertainty can be injected.
In any event take it from me there is no doubt you can run AKIDA with every ARM processor under the Sun.
Now this should draw out the Ogre if I am wrong.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Upon a bit more investigation, I decided to look up the holdings of VAS - Vanguard Australian Shares ETF,. It appears that 0.06692% of the VAS ETF are made of Brainchip shares:Brainchip rely on the share register Boardroom to provide the list of top 20.
I would suggest you could send the two lists to Tony Dawe and ask him for clarification.
Regards
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
Twice as much as Intel.
OK, I've finished my baklava...Ok, this has got me confused.
The top 20 shareholders list as per last announcement on 1AUG22 is:
View attachment 15431
On the MSN Money website, it shows Brainchip ownership by Mutual Fund:
View attachment 15426
And also ownership of Brainchip shares by Institutions:
View attachment 15427
I'm not sure how current the data is on the MSN website, but these 2 lists are totally different to that shown on the Top 20 Shareholders list. Would anyone have any suggestions as to what insight the lists from the MSN website give us?
(I presume all these other entities hold BRN shares, which is good!)
Is that a Greek woolen snow helmet?OK, I've finished my baklava...
So, the major institutions currently hold 92,358,248 BRN shares, and Mutual funds hold 77,944,054 BRN shares. (Total 170,302,338 shares - pretty close to the total represented by Citicorp Nominees)
Its great to be a shareholder!
From the 2021 Ai Field Day presentation by Anil Mankar available on Brainchip website.For mine the simple diagram and specs on the BRN website shows no specific M class and does not differentiate so I take that can be applied to any M class or should state M4/F or could be misleading so I'll take any M.
View attachment 15434
Mutual Funds are a subset of Institutional Owners. Mutual Funds are a list of all the different funds you can invest in. Individual ETF's are usually listed on a bourse where the institutional owner collects fees for running it and the rest are internal investment funds for their own clients where they charge fees as well. As an example, all iShare ETF mutual funds are run by BlackRock as the institutional owner.Ok, this has got me confused.
The top 20 shareholders list as per last announcement on 1AUG22 is:
View attachment 15431
On the MSN Money website, it shows Brainchip ownership by Mutual Fund:
View attachment 15426
And also ownership of Brainchip shares by Institutions:
View attachment 15427
I'm not sure how current the data is on the MSN website, but these 2 lists are totally different to that shown on the Top 20 Shareholders list. Would anyone have any suggestions as to what insight the lists from the MSN website give us?
(I presume all these other entities hold BRN shares, which is good!)
Late trade today is interesting? Seems like a ETF topped up?Mutual Funds are a subset of Institutional Owners. Mutual Funds are a list of all the different funds you can invest in. Individual ETF's are usually listed on a bourse where the institutional owner collects fees for running it and the rest are internal investment funds for their own clients where they charge fees as well. As an example, all iShare ETF mutual funds are run by BlackRock as the institutional owner.
The MSN money list looks out of date. As we all know there has been a lot of institutional buying in the last couple of months. What intrigues me is Australian Super funds seem to own the bare minimum allowable according to their own fund rules. Having said that, a lot of the smaller super funds might be hidden inside the Institutions. Have a look at SYR below.
View attachment 15446
View attachment 15445