equanimous
Norse clairvoyant shapeshifter goddess
Discussions on BRN making announcements has been a bit dissapointing.
Two reasons:
1. It highlights how some people think shouting at the TV will cause change despite the continuing evidence that nothing happens the louder you scream. Common sense dictates that a letter to the TV station or regulator has some chance of causing change and that so too might sending an email to Brainchip Investor Relations setting out concerns and outlining what type of information shareholders would like to see in the 4C. Then again why not just sit there screaming at the computer screen hoping against all the evidence that it will effect change.
2. Basing an argument about the inadequacies of an ASX listed company (Brainchip) not making announcements on the fact that a private unlisted company (Nviso) which is seeking to raise capital and eventually list on the ASX and is trying to pump interest in its company to a frenzy before it is regulated and can only tell the absolute truth as determined by the ASX is just plain stupid.
Apples and oranges have more in common than Brainchip and Nviso where the ability to make announcements is concerned.
In fact if they thought to analysis the releases by Nviso they would know that Nviso would not have been allowed to release the majority of the things they have if they were a listed on the ASX.
Just by way of example the claims by Nviso they have signed two deals with OEM Tier 1 & 2 automotive companies would not be permitted unless they disclosed full details of the contracts and the names of the two companies. The Panasonic deal would have to be fully disclosed as to the terms of the deal and the dollars and cents that will flow as would the Siemens Health engagement.
Holding Brainchip to the standards of Nviso is just incorrect.
Two reasons:
1. It highlights how some people think shouting at the TV will cause change despite the continuing evidence that nothing happens the louder you scream. Common sense dictates that a letter to the TV station or regulator has some chance of causing change and that so too might sending an email to Brainchip Investor Relations setting out concerns and outlining what type of information shareholders would like to see in the 4C. Then again why not just sit there screaming at the computer screen hoping against all the evidence that it will effect change.
2. Basing an argument about the inadequacies of an ASX listed company (Brainchip) not making announcements on the fact that a private unlisted company (Nviso) which is seeking to raise capital and eventually list on the ASX and is trying to pump interest in its company to a frenzy before it is regulated and can only tell the absolute truth as determined by the ASX is just plain stupid.
Apples and oranges have more in common than Brainchip and Nviso where the ability to make announcements is concerned.
In fact if they thought to analysis the releases by Nviso they would know that Nviso would not have been allowed to release the majority of the things they have if they were a listed on the ASX.
Just by way of example the claims by Nviso they have signed two deals with OEM Tier 1 & 2 automotive companies would not be permitted unless they disclosed full details of the contracts and the names of the two companies. The Panasonic deal would have to be fully disclosed as to the terms of the deal and the dollars and cents that will flow as would the Siemens Health engagement.
Holding Brainchip to the standards of Nviso is just incorrect.
..
