BRN Discussion Ongoing

[DingoBorat]

@wilzy123, did you email or phone the ASX?

 

[wilzy123]

@wilzy123, did you email or phone the ASX?

All I did was fill this form (https://www2.asx.com.au/about/contact-asx/customer-feedback/feedback) out. They responded to me by email with supremely dumb information and said that they would look into it.

 

[Straw]

This place is getting a little too silly for my liking. If you post lots of You tube videos of kittens playing with balls of wool or such like it seems to be acceptable but if you ask pertinent questions that may not have a positive vibe your motive gets questioned.
I came here hoping for a good dose of reality but it doesnt seem to be playing out that way.
iuix I suspect would like to keep things real . So would I.
A healthy dose of enthusiasm is one thing but there seems to be a lot of inexperienced teenagers who just cant contain themselves.
And while I am at it , the quantity ( or lack of ) of posts somebody makes should not affect their credibility.
Lets keep it real people.

Essentially being a room full of complete strangers some level of trust needs to be established otherwise why would anyone take anyone else seriously. After what many of us have been through (the things that led to the formation of this forum) someone who makes the odd comment yes they should be questioned (politely to begin with) as to where their reasonings and motives lie.
If verifiable facts are being offered they can be checked out by other participants.

 

[DingoBorat]

All I did was fill this form (https://www2.asx.com.au/about/contact-asx/customer-feedback/feedback) out. They responded to me by email with supremely dumb information and said that they would look into it.

Cheers, I want to let them know tomorrow, how many times they've been contacted about it, that's why I'm asking.

The person I spoke to, said they were only aware of one email, which they received over the weekend..

I said, "So now, next time BRN is in the Top 5 Gainers/Losers, they will be there? Or will it be a case of "we still don't know what's going on"?"

Their reply was, that they will look into what's happening and give me an update, at the very least tomorrow..

 

[wilzy123]

Cheers, I want to let them know tomorrow, how many times they've been contacted about it, that's why I'm asking.

The person I spoke to, said they were only aware of one email, which they received over the weekend..

I said, "So now, next time BRN is in the Top 5 Gainers/Losers, they will be there? Or will it be a case of "we still don't know what's going on"?"

Their reply was, that they will look into what's happening and give me an update, at the very least tomorrow..

I'll PM you some specific information/dates re: my efforts.

 

[Frank Zappa]

Got a tip and they normally good View attachment 13133

MOU is not a legal contract . Just infers the two parties are on the same page in relation to looking at working together if everything works out for the betterment of both parties. It can simply lapse with out announcement and as there is nothing binding about it it cannot be announced

 

[Deleted member 118]

MOU is not a legal contract . Just infers the two parties are on the same page in relation to looking at working together if everything works out for the betterment of both parties. It can simply lapse with out announcement and as there is nothing binding about it it cannot be announced

Too late

 

[TheFunkMachine]

I am not here to filter through 100000+ daily posts, and I only replied because DHM tagged me. I am not the sheriff of tsex. And you are right my people skills are shit but I value honesty and directness.

This iceberg and the other thing are effectively "a turd in a punchbowl". One single name that doesn't belong destroys the credibility of the entire list.


But do you really need me to point out that there is zero connection to some of these names? Just look at the evidence yourself, if there is no connection to reality just remove the name

Hei @uiux can you please Point out all the names On the Iceberg that you Deem BS. I think it would be a healthy discussion and give the TSEx 1000 eyes a chance to defend its place on the Ice berg. I don’t read daily and have missed a few of these links myself, so it would be great to rehash some of these connections IMO

 

[DingoBorat]

Very bold, uiux. Someone of a lesser statue may have been tarred and feathered.

I agree with the uiux and believe the iceberg should show less names above AND below, and am only now admitting it because I never had the courage of uiux. Companies / customers providing money via IP contracts to Brainchip deserve mentioning. The rest is just feel good stuff that may or may not pan out. Some of these connections to Brainchip are strong, some are tenuous, but all share the common trait of not having any contractual relationship with brainchip providing money or revenue....yet. And $50,000 dollars for early adopter status doesn't cut it in my book, but will let them below the water line.

Megachips and Renesas deserve to be above the waterline. Mercedes....it's clear they like Akida, but I'm just not sure how they will obtain it in 2024. Via Nvidia? Perhaps. Some of those others, ....?????? For example, Dell? Really? Speaking on an early Rob Telson podcast does not a customer make. Nvidia goes beneath the waterline. Dell,....sorry, neither above or below the waterline,....yet.

Still, I'm bullish and holding strong. I just "feel" what uiux is saying.

dippY

Hey DippY22, by you're stringent criteria, NASA shouldn't be above the waterline either, as we haven't received any significant income?

Same goes for Arm, Edge Impulse, SiFive, Nvisio, Prophesee..

They are just "feel good stuff"?

I know the Iceberg, is more a bit of illustrative fun, but agree with Uiux, that it could be more accurate.
But "above the water line" should not be confined to just the relationships that are bringing in significant dollars, but all known relationships, as that is what the "Ecosystem" we are developing is all about and the combination of which, that will lead to Brainchip's success.

 

[Deleted member 118]

Hey DippY22, by you're stringent criteria, NASA shouldn't be above the waterline either, as we haven't received any significant income?

Same goes for Arm, Edge Impulse, SiFive, Nvisio, Prophesee..

They are just "feel good stuff"?

I know the Iceberg, is more a bit of illustrative fun, but agree with Uiux, that it could be more accurate.
But "above the water line" should not be confined to just the relationships that are bringing in significant dollars, but all known relationships, as that is what the "Ecosystem" we are developing is all about and the combination of which, that will lead to Brainchip's success.

Poor iceberg it was fun while it lasted

 

[Boab]

Bosch has big plans. Sorry to our German friends if this has already been posted.

Dr Hartung also touched on how there’ll probably be more semiconductor company and software company partnerships too.

“Our partnership system will probably explode,” said Dr Hartung.

Bosch boss says it's impossible to solve chip shortages this year

The head of supplier Bosch warns chip shortages will continue into 2023 even as the company invests billions into its semiconductor chip division.

www.carexpert.com.au

 

[DingoBorat]

I don’t disagree with your intentions Uiux, and doubt many would - it’s your delivery that’s the problem.

We’re all adults, let’s behave that way. Nobody ever accused me of being the most diplomatic of persons, but when dealing with well intentioned people, it’s best to be civil.

Posts can be like bullets and the keyboards are like the guns.

The statement "Guns don't kill people, people kill people" is wrong really, because guns are designed to kill and do it very well.
Someone might be in an emotionally charged state, but won't kill..
But put a gun in their hands and it's all too easy..
They don't have time to think about their actions and just the slight squeeze of the trigger and its done.

People should think about it, before hitting the "reply" button..
There is no pressure, sitting behind the keyboard..

 

[Bravo]

Hei @uiux can you please Point out all the names On the Iceberg that you Deem BS. I think it would be a healthy discussion and give the TSEx 1000 eyes a chance to defend its place on the Ice berg. I don’t read daily and have missed a few of these links myself, so it would be great to rehash some of these connections IMO

Hey Funky @TheFunkMachine, I'll help both you and @BaconLover if I can. We can all do this together!

 

[wilzy123]

ROFL... another 2,097,873 shorts sales yesterday.

Generally, I agree with the sentiment that "fortune favours the brave", but this is more akin to "gambling" IMO.

 

[David holland]

While Citi may be a custodian, a lot of beneficial owners have no say as to what to buy or sell. Many beneficial owners just give their funds to Citi (probably in some managed fund) and it is up to Citi to trade.

The Tech stats At this Point of Time hmm

 

[Space Cadet]

Hey Funky @TheFunkMachine, I'll help both you and @BaconLover if I can. We can all do this together!

@Bravo,

Are these your boots?

SC

 

[Food4 thought]

Keep the Iceberg. It’s a great point of reference.

I am pissed I didn’t copy the iceberg before it was taken away
Oh well that sucks

 

[Food4 thought]

I first started to read the crapper forums and I always felt annoyed by the rubbish that was published on it…
Then this great forum started and it was so refreshing and pleasant informative and funny as well.
But now it’s like if we are not making money you all want to rip each other a new asshole.
Seriously unfortunately this is now the second crapper, and I wish it wasn’t…

 

[projection]

I am pissed I didn’t copy the iceberg before it was taken away
Oh well that sucks

 

[Neuromorphia]

Hi Stuart,

I don't have the reference link of Simon Thorpe's presentation to hand, but this slide illustrates N-of-M coding:

Neural Bases of Rapid Visual Information Processing
Simon Thorpe Brain and Cognition Research Centre (CerCo) BrainChip Inc
Toulouse, Franc

View attachment 13103

Basically if there are M spikes arriving higgeldy-piggeldy, you only need to process the first N spikes. This greatly reduces the amount of processing required.

The strongest spikes having the most relevant information arrive earlier than the weaker spikes.

Evidence for this was found in the 1920s, but overlooked for several decades:

View attachment 13104

Simon Thorpe presentation in IMEC ACADEMY: The importance of Spikes for power-efficient AI systems
https://thestockexchange.com.au/threads/brn-discussion-2022.1/post-43878