BRN Discussion Ongoing

[stuart888]

Being new here, I thought Tip of the Iceberg was speculation on lots. The NDAs make a document like this hard to be perfect. I thought lots of it was speculation.

Maybe the top left of the Iceberg needs a bullet explaining what it means to be there. Same for what it means to be on the right top side of the Iceberg and below the waterline.

Perhaps this document needs to be clear that it is based up both partnerships, contracts, but also speculation.

 

[uiux]

so if it's all about clear connections, you can hardly put anyone in contact with Brainchip. But that's exactly the great thing, because of all this secrecy, you have to set yourself up and look for links, many here can do this through insane hardware knowledge, others maybe only by looking for immense Like research on the Internet and building connections.
'Fact Finder` had much more extensive experiences and that's exactly how an iceberg was created, where I don't think anyone claims to be totally correct

Look my opinion on the matter is truthful and accurate


You can keep living the fantasy if you want, just keep it in your head not where it can get my hopes up and disappoint me when I determine its fan fiction



And we can keep arguing over this trivial shit if you really wanna see how shit my people skills are

 

[cosors]

I am in favor of Kuka disappearing altogether and ZF of all being submerged at most. That is the only thing I can contribute.

 

[uiux]

It's an easy process to fix

Produce a bullet point for each name justifying it's existence of the list

If the reason is weak - remove the item or put it on another more relevant list, eg. Partner of partner

 

[Dhm]

@Dhm asked @Bravo about the connection between Nvidia and Brainchip, I think she will be able to explain something about it to us.
One could wait and see.
With your derogatory reaction, you strongly question the many researches of all those who have been dealing with brainchips for years.
Many of these great members want to filter all these posts, which they apparently don't have and don't have to do, since not everyone has the time to do so.

An appreciation of this enormous work by these long-standing shareholders would be appropriate, wouldn't it?

My request to @Bravo was on the back of his positive link between us and NVIDIA. He was very upbeat. My link to @uiux was because of the amazing generous work linking us with a strong number of clients, and if anyone would be able to direct me to it or away from it would be him.

it’s all good guys, we are a team, or that’s how I believe it is. We have a common goal.

 

[Deena]

I am in favor of Kuka disappearing altogether and ZF of all being submerged at most. That is the only thing I can contribute.

It looks like it is time to audit the iceberg to ensure that it remains relevant.
What is needed now is a process to do this and perhaps making stated criteria of what is required for a company to be / remain above the waterline.
Credibility is everything.

 

[uiux]

It looks like it is time to audit the iceberg to ensure that it remains relevant.
What is needed now is a process to do this and perhaps making stated criteria of what is required for a company to be / remain above the waterline.
Credibility is everything.

Credibility is everything

 

[Sirod69]

Leave this iceberg...

This iceberg is not the reason I am invested in Brainchip, nor is this forum. The reason is that I was already convinced of it beforehand.

I enjoy this forum precisely because of the vast amount of knowledge I don't have about neuromorphic chips (was only a bit of a programmer) and all the research and speculation here, unlike other forums.
Also, I often laugh a lot here.

By the way, I would put VW afloat a long time ago *laughs

 

[uiux]

Leave this iceberg...
View attachment 13065

This iceberg is not the reason I am invested in Brainchip, nor is this forum. The reason is that I was already convinced of it beforehand.

I enjoy this forum precisely because of the vast amount of knowledge I don't have about neuromorphic chips (was only a bit of a programmer) and all the research and speculation here, unlike other forums.
Also, I often laugh a lot here.

By the way, I would put VW afloat a long time ago *laughs

https://www.asx.com.au/asxpdf/20170501/pdf/43hxkl0f99yxy0.pdf

"The Machine Vision market is most notably represented by the automotive industry. As Autonomous Driver Assisted Systems (ADAS) and fully autonomous vehicles become more prevalent the requirements for realtime video analytics become more critical. BrainChip’s Spiking Neural Network represents a best-in-class solution for this demanding application. The Company is currently engaged with IniLabs in Switzerland, a developer of DVS cameras that are applicable in autonomous vehicle applications. The Company is also engaged in discussions with Volkswagen."

 

[cosors]

It looks like it is time to audit the iceberg to ensure that it remains relevant.
What is needed now is a process to do this and perhaps making stated criteria of what is required for a company to be / remain above the waterline.
Credibility is everything.

I would call it evaluate. But you are right.
It was asked who made the robots in the picture. I am still sure that Kuka. And I'm put me on Kuka because automation ist massive. I followed both (ZF) intensively and still bite my teeth. Over water is confirmed and below is with many circumstantial evidence. Everything else must go. Only that is not easy. I can speak only for these two since I have really long and often searched there you can believe me. Kuka must go away and ZF very deep in the water. Almost nothing has been found out about ZF. Conti I would put under the water surface like Bosh. But that is only my estimation.

___
OK "my" MosChip is OK

 

[Pmel]

Come on Brainchip one announcement with a known brand. We are all dot joining with lot of companies. Time has come . We are getting frustrated waiting and waiting. Please .........
Time to teach those shorters

 

[Sirod69]

I would call it evaluate. But you are right.
It was asked who made the robots in the picture. I am still sure that Kuka. And I'm put me on Kuka because automation ist massive. I followed both (ZF) intensively and still bite my teeth. Over water is confirmed and below is with many circumstantial evidence. Everything else must go. Only that is not easy. I can speak only for these two since I have really long and often searched there you can believe me. Kuka must go away and ZF very deep in the water. Almost nothing has been found out about ZF. Conti I would put under the water surface like Bosh. But that is only my estimation.

___
OK "my" MosChip is OK

oh dear, i didn't even know that there are different places in the air and in the water, i thought it was arbitrariness (oh what a nice word "arbitrariness" in English) in germany we would now say who exactly takes is a penny pincher

I have to take a closer look at MosChip again

 

[Xray1]

Hi JK. There seems to be some confusion amongst some posters about how shorting works, so I will try to explain it in a simple way from my understanding. If it's not quite right I'm sure someone will correct the record.

1. Lets say a big institution is accumulating say a tech company involved in AI using SNN. It could be any company which has commercial hardware available, so feel free to pick any one!

2. So the large fund / insto has a sh1t load of these AI shares and they say. Well we have all these shares sitting here, we can just sit on them and wait for them to go up or is there some other way to make money from them. I KNOW! Let's lend them to some shorter. We charge them an upfront fee and a percentage of their value to lend them out for a pre-arranged maximum time ... with the proviso that we can call them in at any time if the sorters position looks challenged.

3. The shorter then, now has a sh1t load of borrowed shares. As a shorter here is my tactics. Firstly I dump a whole bunch of the borrowed shares on the market at a critical time - usually following a recent rise while running down the shares to produce negative sentiment.

4. Some holders will have a stop loss in place and because of the sudden drop in the market these stop losses are hit, prompting a further drop in the market.

5. Other retail holders see the share price dropping, panic and also sell. As the prices fall the shorters step back in and buy back the shares for much less than what they sold for. They then return the shares with the interest from who they borrowed from, and pocket their profits.

6. Of course, if the price goes up instead of down, then the shorters get caught in a short squeeze. They still have to buy back the shares to return them, but they pay more rather than less.

They obviously made big profits this time round !!!!

 

[Sirod69]

our last trading platform in germany, I'm curious how Australia will react today

 

[RobjHunt]

View attachment 13071
our last trading platform in germany, I'm curious how Australia will react today

Hey @Sirod69 , is this showing BrainChip is in the green? Sorry, I'm not sure what the last close was.

 

[Foxdog]

Uiux and all, we wouldn't be having this conversation (argument) if BRN was more forthcoming with information.
NDA's aside, we are placing an immense trust in management during this commercialisation period and I for one can't afford to lose what I have invested . We are here for one reason - life changing gains on our investment and continued speculation on progress will only become more and more frustrating.

Its ok for Sean to say 'follow the revenue' but it's a bit of an ask when each 4C is 12 weeks apart and doesn't update on actual progress with partners.....

 

[Cardpro]

Hopefully once major companies announce the relationship with us, hopefully they can fuck nda and also use our name as one of the advantages... also I dont think we will be dominating the AI market any time soon, we can dominate the edge AI market for early adopters first (power sensitive ones like ev, drones, etc.) and the rest later

 

[Sirod69]

Hey @Sirod69 , zeigt das, dass BrainChip im grünen Bereich ist? Soory, ich bin mir nicht sicher, was der letzte Abschluss war.

no it was still -2,26 minus, but we had today almost 6% minus, we had 0,698 and at the end 0,734, it comes up again

 

[jla]

Hey @Sirod69 , is this showing BrainChip is in the green? Sorry, I'm not sure what the last close was.

Tradegate vol 483,249 @0,72.4 down 4.2%

 

[Cardpro]

Uiux and all, we wouldn't be having this conversation (argument) if BRN was more forthcoming with information.
NDA's aside, we are placing an immense trust in management during this commercialisation period and I for one can't afford to lose what I have invested . We are here for one reason - life changing gains on our investment and continued speculation on progress will only become more and more frustrating.

Its ok for Sean to say 'follow the revenue' but it's a bit of an ask when each 4C is 12 weeks apart and doesn't update on actual progress with partners.....

So true... people are spending 100s of hours to find potential links as we dont get any freaking updates other than the partnership announcements. We haven't had any proper price sensitive announcements for ages (othet than quartetly reports)...