BRN Discussion Ongoing

Violin1

Regular
Good morning....

After our AGM concluded in late May I contacted the company (an individual) with my concern that or more to the point a question directly, squarely at, why the CEO threw in the line that the company was intending to employ a further 4 Non-Executive directors before this year was out, and "possibly" a fifth...as soon as that comment was made, my mind started cherning, why would we want to double the Board size, it seemed to me to be a little premature...Had another company or potential large investor put the word on the Board that if something were to play out over the next 6/12 months that this alleged company or large investor wanted or demanded a number of seats on the Board moving foward.

Anyway, the shutters went up (as predicted) and very recently I followed up with two specific questions to the company to see if they were prepared to elaborate on what clearly has been a change in direction, for example, no longer a chip company, as such, but solely an IP company.

In my opinion this business direction, that is, casually mentioning a plan surrounding the massive Board expansion, and I mean, pretty casually just throwing it out there at the AGM with really no foundation, well, I'm 100% convinced that something rather major is on the near horizon, as it's definitely 100% sensitive, whatever is going down, the Citicorp Nominees holding of over 174 Million that was recently exposed, surpassing our great Founder and long time No.1 stakeholder Peter Van, without even a whisper, tells me the roller coaster ride many of us have been on over the last 7 plus years, is about to become more curvier, hang on..somethings definitely at play, what I don't know, but my personal trust in both Peter and Anil leads me to think, great things are fast approaching.

From a wet & cold Sunday morning in Perth.....Tech x
Hi @TECH - hope you are right about the acceleration. However, we did confirm that the comment at the AGM was an additional one director to take it to five ratherthan an extra four or five. Haven't found the post but I recall confirming this via Tony Dawe.
Regards
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 19 users

Violin1

Regular
I remember this discussion going around post the agm. For some reason my memory was that it was intended to add one extra board to the mix?
I haven't looked back through so may be wrong. Does that discussion ring a bell for anyone else?
Cheers Al
Yep. Spot on. I confirmed with Tony Dawe.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 16 users

Violin1

Regular
I'm just sayin. I called it first. Back on coldcrapper.

FF was the ultimate downramper. He spent years building up our trust with facts and logic, and regaling us with anecdotes like "akida ballista" and "blind Freddy...", only to bail towards the end of the first chapter of commercialisation, just as the insto's arrive, and causing us to fall into a panic of conspiracy theories. We've dropped from $2.43 to almost $0.80!!

What was his old area of law? Who were his clients? Could he have been a commercial lawyer for clients like citicorp? Who would know?

Is that wild enough speculation? Hopefully it provokes him into posting again. Or suing me for defamation? Either way at least we'll know he's alive and well...
I almost gave you a spray, in defence of FF. Luckily I caught on that you were using irony. Lol
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users

Perhaps

Regular
Wonder why this comes up lately. When I have a look on an old shareholder list from January, it's full of Nominees. One company could use different Nominees if wanted. So if someone cares for this, he/she should be nervous for months, not for days cause of a single 10% holding.
I see it as a confirmation of my investment. Would be a warning sign when at this stage only small retail investors are interested in the company.

Screenshot 2022-07-17 at 13-30-25 Brainchip Holdings Ltd (ASX BRN) Share Price - Market Index.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 9 users

stuart888

Regular
Good morning....

After our AGM concluded in late May I contacted the company (an individual) with my concern that or more to the point a question directly, squarely at, why the CEO threw in the line that the company was intending to employ a further 4 Non-Executive directors before this year was out, and "possibly" a fifth...as soon as that comment was made, my mind started cherning, why would we want to double the Board size, it seemed to me to be a little premature...Had another company or potential large investor put the word on the Board that if something were to play out over the next 6/12 months that this alleged company or large investor wanted or demanded a number of seats on the Board moving foward.

Anyway, the shutters went up (as predicted) and very recently I followed up with two specific questions to the company to see if they were prepared to elaborate on what clearly has been a change in direction, for example, no longer a chip company, as such, but solely an IP company.

In my opinion this business direction, that is, casually mentioning a plan surrounding the massive Board expansion, and I mean, pretty casually just throwing it out there at the AGM with really no foundation, well, I'm 100% convinced that something rather major is on the near horizon, as it's definitely 100% sensitive, whatever is going down, the Citicorp Nominees holding of over 174 Million that was recently exposed, surpassing our great Founder and long time No.1 stakeholder Peter Van, without even a whisper, tells me the roller coaster ride many of us have been on over the last 7 plus years, is about to become more curvier, hang on..somethings definitely at play, what I don't know, but my personal trust in both Peter and Anil leads me to think, great things are fast approaching.

From a wet & cold Sunday morning in Perth.....Tech x
Thanks so much Tech, keeping us on this important topic. I got the impression that this was all needed to be Uplifted into Nasdaq. The new diversity rules seeming force companies to spend more money on the Board in order to have the application qualify. Seems like expanding the board is forward thinking, with the pending revenue stream getting ready to start in the pending months/quarters.

1658059920468.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 8 users
Super is complex so read a couple of books and lots of articles on it before acting. As others have/will post you can start a SMSF or choose a fund that allows direct investment to gather BRN shares. You have to wait until your preservation age to access but you could sell them before that date, sit on the cash in the fund for certainty and borrow to live if you retire early. Not ideal and not advice - but depends how desperate you are to stop working and relies on BRN booming and then you being prepared to turn it into cash (which I'd find difficult when it finally accelerates).
Not advice not advice nah nah not advice. Best fortunes to you.
Thanks. Have read lots today already and it’s indeed very complex and riddled with pitfalls and fees. So I’ll have a better look at it and will likely contact a few experts as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
F

Filobeddo

Guest
Hi @TECH - hope you are right about the acceleration. However, we did confirm that the comment at the AGM was an additional one director to take it to five ratherthan an extra four or five. Haven't found the post but I recall confirming this via Tony Dawe.
Regards

These extra board seat(s) intrigue me, unless I’ve overlooked, this topic doesn’t appear to be minuted in the May AGM.

Would’ve expected it to be
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
 
Last edited:
  • Fire
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 9 users

Shadow59

Regular
I’m still here but without FF I’m lost for words.
Hi Blind Freddie
Wow! It is so good to hear from you, words or not🤣🤣🤣.
If you "see" FF around say hello for us, and remind him he still has a lot of friends here.
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 26 users

Just bored and posting slightly relevant stuff
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 5 users

Shadow59

Regular
I’m still here but without FF I’m lost for words.
:::',.:.';:,.":;'°•.`▪︎¡!😉
.;:,"'!,;::.:;,'▪︎•°`~°,.🤣🤣🤣🤣
':;,.":;,+.,;:;:;":;:❤😁
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 8 users

Perhaps

Regular
This link gave me a nice journey through spiking neural network related US patents. All well known names there, Intel, IBM, Qualcomm, Samsung, Arm, Tata. Of course complete absence of Nvidia.
But the most important thing , there are Brainchip assigned patents or applications and some directly to PvdM (and sometimes additional names). So apart from the 8 known Brainchip US patents there are 6 more patent applications up to Peter and friends. Here's the list of Brainchip-free patent applications so far:



And here the ones assigned to Brainchip:


This needs a deeper look by technicians how this all works. Maybe this is Peter's safety belt.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 34 users

cosors

👀
You're welcome. Sadly a real confirmation is overwritten inbetween hours by wild speculations on investors and other stuff again.
I think that's already right how you did it, first in the general thread and if confirmed by the 1000 eyes off in the special thread. FF has also sometimes done so and fetched posts from the special in the main thread. In the specific threads can be overlooked about, because not all have so much time to keep everything in the overview.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 5 users

Esq.111

Fascinatingly Intuitive.
This link gave me a nice journey through spiking neural network related US patents. All well known names there, Intel, IBM, Qualcomm, Samsung, Arm, Tata. Of course complete absence of Nvidia.
But the most important thing , there are Brainchip assigned patents or applications and some directly to PvdM (and sometimes additional names). So apart from the 8 known Brainchip US patents there are 6 more patent applications up to Peter and friends. Here's the list of Brainchip-free patent applications so far:



And here the ones assigned to Brainchip:


This needs a deeper look by technicians how this all works. Maybe this is Peter's safety belt.
Morning Perhaps,

Great find and cheers for posting.

I think it would be beneficial to start a new thread to state all the granted patents , followed by all the patents pending.

Possibly like the Iceberg thread.

Thankyou once again.

Regards,
Esq.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 18 users

Perhaps

Regular
Morning Perhaps,

Great find and cheers for posting.

I think it would be beneficial to start a new thread to state all the granted patents , followed by all the patents pending.

Possibly like the Iceberg thread.

Thankyou once again.

Regards,
Esq.
Good morning. There already exists a thread about patents. Wanted a review of some people first, as this is not a field I know much about. Maybe I'm completely wrong and this needs to be deleted.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

dippY22

Regular
If you're recording The Open stop reading.



Today on the 14th hole at St. Andrews, Cam Smith struck an eagle putt (chip,... technically) to within a foot of the hole and announcer Paul Azinger said, "did you see this coming?" Meaning, who knew Cam Smith had this in him today?

Well, Paul, I did. And that is exactly why about a month ago I posted that Brainchip should use Cameron to advertise their brand and provide Brainchip name recognition to golf's million's of viewers by having Cam wear the name "Brainchip" on his golf shirts. This marketing campaign would have cost Brainchip a lot of money. Alas, now I'm afraid they cannot afford to.

Cameron put on a golfing demonstration today that was historic and charged after and overtook emotional favorite and tournament leader, Rory Mcllroy. Australia should be extremely proud of the golfer Cameron Smith.

Regard, dippY
 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 32 users

cosors

👀
I’m still here but without FF I’m lost for words.
There are 60 more pages of posts to come. Love to the blind speechless Freddie. Somehow I feel serene now 🤗
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users

Esq.111

Fascinatingly Intuitive.
Good morning. There already exists a thread about patents. Wanted a review of some people first, as this is not a field I know much about. Maybe I'm completely wrong and this needs to be deleted.
Hi Perhaps,

You are correct, just had a look on the thread page, page 6 of 10, BRAINCHIP PATENTS.

There is certainly an absolute mountain of information compiled here, over a myriad of threads by the thousand eyes.

Esq.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12 users

uiux

Regular
Hi Perhaps,

You are correct, just had a look on the thread page, page 6 of 10, BRAINCHIP PATENTS.

There is certainly an absolute mountain of information compiled here, over a myriad of threads by the thousand eyes.

Esq.

@Perhaps

I've been trying to keep my research organised:



 
  • Like
  • Love
  • Fire
Reactions: 27 users
D

Deleted member 118

Guest
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 7 users
Top Bottom