BRN Discussion Ongoing

[uiux]

You're welcome. Sadly a real confirmation is overwritten inbetween hours by wild speculations on investors and other stuff again.

Yep

That's why I stick to dedicated threads and try to keep them as unpolluted as possible

 

[Fox151]

IMO
I don't think people should be writing messages to provoke people

 

[Diogenese]

I'm just sayin. I called it first. Back on coldcrapper.

FF was the ultimate downramper. He spent years building up our trust with facts and logic, and regaling us with anecdotes like "akida ballista" and "blind Freddy...", only to bail towards the end of the first chapter of commercialisation, just as the insto's arrive, and causing us to fall into a panic of conspiracy theories. We've dropped from $2.43 to almost $0.80!!

What was his old area of law? Who were his clients? Could he have been a commercial lawyer for clients like citicorp? Who would know?

Is that wild enough speculation? Hopefully it provokes him into posting again. Or suing me for defamation? Either way at least we'll know he's alive and well...

I doubt he'll sue, just refer you to some of his grateful clients.

 

[HopalongPetrovski]

I doubt he'll sue, just refer you to some of his grateful clients.

 

[alwaysgreen]

You're welcome. Sadly a real confirmation is overwritten inbetween hours by wild speculations on investors and other stuff again.

People are just having a laugh. We're generally all here with the shared goal of wanting Brainchip to be wildly successful and for us all to build wealth.

It doesn't hurt to speculate and joke around either.

Hi FF. Miss your wisdom mate.

 

[Perhaps]

People are just having a laugh. We're generally all here with the shared goal of wanting Brainchip to be wildly successful and for us all to build wealth.

It doesn't hurt to speculate and joke around either.

Hi FF. Miss your wisdom mate.

No problem. As uiux said, it's better to concentrate on dedicated threads when it comes to real news. It's good to have a forum with different threads where is enough space for everything. Imagine we are limited to just one thread where everything is posted on our German forum, apart from the blocked trolls..

 

[Dolci]

Hi all,

Can someone please explain to me how according to Dolci’s info ‘Citigroup is not buying ... they don't even hold shares acording to this’ yet they appear as a top 20 holder according to a poster who accessed the top 20 list?
Trying to learn. Thank you in advance.

Serengeti, Citicorp Nominees is a subsidiary of Citigroup, being a Nominee Co they can hold for individual investors without revealing their client's identity, those clients can be even some board members as we already know that Anil & Mitro are in some of these accounts, as you know some of them have gifted some of their shares to family & charity, that what makes it hard to keep track, but I don't believe that Citicorp holds 173 M shares as someone has posted, the way I see it is that they are holding more than one of the family members in that 72 M that is on the latest Top 20, I know that Mitro has gifted some of his shares when I spoke to him at the AGM .....

Bacon Lover is right "Always take the information you're presented with a grain of salt,"

View attachment 11643
View attachment 11642


View attachment 11645

View attachment 11646


View attachment 11648


View attachment 11649

 

[Rise from the ashes]

You're welcome. Sadly a real confirmation is overwritten inbetween hours by wild speculations on investors and other stuff again.

I look forward to digging further into it much appreciated again.
pretty sure that was the best find today.

 

[Slade]

In recent emails to a few share holders from Tony, he's indirectly acknowledged Citicorp involvement.

Rule no 1 in share market is NEVER trust anyone else.

Always take the information you're presented with a grain of salt, you'll have 4C and latest info on shareholders this month, so I'm waiting until then to see what's going on.

If they don't disclose it, I'll be going to Melbourne office myself to see.

Spot on.

 

[Rise from the ashes]

If there was a takeover geez I hope we don't get short changed

Yes of course, But i'm refusing to jump onto this bandwagon that has been presented to us.

 

[Serengeti]

Serengeti, Citicorp Nominees is a subsidiary of Citigroup, being a Nominee Co they can hold for individual investors without revealing their client's identity, those clients can be even some board members as we already know that Anil & Mitro are in some of these accounts, as you know some of them have gifted some of their shares to family & charity, that what makes it hard to keep track, but I don't believe that Citicorp holds 173 M shares as someone has posted, the way I see it is that they are holding more than one of the family members in that 72 M that is on the latest Top 20, I know that Mitro has gifted some of his shares when I spoke to him at the AGM .....

Bacon Lover is right "Always take the information you're presented with a grain of salt,"

View attachment 11656



View attachment 11643
View attachment 11642


View attachment 11645

View attachment 11646


View attachment 11648


View attachment 11649

Cheers Dolci.

 

[Rise from the ashes]

Yep

That's why I stick to dedicated threads and try to keep them as unpolluted as possible

If I have created any greenhouse gas in one of those threads just link the posts and I'll delete. (there goes 98 percent of my posts)

 

[uiux]

If I have created any greenhouse gas in one of those threads just link the posts and I'll delete. (there goes 98 percent of my posts)

Lol

Not sure, but I report all garbage irrelevant posts ASAP

So if u notice anything report it so it gets cleaned up

 

[Deleted member 118]

Never seen this before and it’s 8 months old. Will delete if posted

 

[Violin1]

Yep which defeats the purpose. I’d like to retire when funds allows me, not the government

Thank you

Super is complex so read a couple of books and lots of articles on it before acting. As others have/will post you can start a SMSF or choose a fund that allows direct investment to gather BRN shares. You have to wait until your preservation age to access but you could sell them before that date, sit on the cash in the fund for certainty and borrow to live if you retire early. Not ideal and not advice - but depends how desperate you are to stop working and relies on BRN booming and then you being prepared to turn it into cash (which I'd find difficult when it finally accelerates).
Not advice not advice nah nah not advice. Best fortunes to you.

 

[Violin1]

Good morning....

After our AGM concluded in late May I contacted the company (an individual) with my concern that or more to the point a question directly, squarely at, why the CEO threw in the line that the company was intending to employ a further 4 Non-Executive directors before this year was out, and "possibly" a fifth...as soon as that comment was made, my mind started cherning, why would we want to double the Board size, it seemed to me to be a little premature...Had another company or potential large investor put the word on the Board that if something were to play out over the next 6/12 months that this alleged company or large investor wanted or demanded a number of seats on the Board moving foward.

Anyway, the shutters went up (as predicted) and very recently I followed up with two specific questions to the company to see if they were prepared to elaborate on what clearly has been a change in direction, for example, no longer a chip company, as such, but solely an IP company.

In my opinion this business direction, that is, casually mentioning a plan surrounding the massive Board expansion, and I mean, pretty casually just throwing it out there at the AGM with really no foundation, well, I'm 100% convinced that something rather major is on the near horizon, as it's definitely 100% sensitive, whatever is going down, the Citicorp Nominees holding of over 174 Million that was recently exposed, surpassing our great Founder and long time No.1 stakeholder Peter Van, without even a whisper, tells me the roller coaster ride many of us have been on over the last 7 plus years, is about to become more curvier, hang on..somethings definitely at play, what I don't know, but my personal trust in both Peter and Anil leads me to think, great things are fast approaching.

From a wet & cold Sunday morning in Perth.....Tech x

Hi @TECH - hope you are right about the acceleration. However, we did confirm that the comment at the AGM was an additional one director to take it to five ratherthan an extra four or five. Haven't found the post but I recall confirming this via Tony Dawe.
Regards

 

[Violin1]

I remember this discussion going around post the agm. For some reason my memory was that it was intended to add one extra board to the mix?
I haven't looked back through so may be wrong. Does that discussion ring a bell for anyone else?
Cheers Al

Yep. Spot on. I confirmed with Tony Dawe.

 

[Violin1]

I'm just sayin. I called it first. Back on coldcrapper.

FF was the ultimate downramper. He spent years building up our trust with facts and logic, and regaling us with anecdotes like "akida ballista" and "blind Freddy...", only to bail towards the end of the first chapter of commercialisation, just as the insto's arrive, and causing us to fall into a panic of conspiracy theories. We've dropped from $2.43 to almost $0.80!!

What was his old area of law? Who were his clients? Could he have been a commercial lawyer for clients like citicorp? Who would know?

Is that wild enough speculation? Hopefully it provokes him into posting again. Or suing me for defamation? Either way at least we'll know he's alive and well...

I almost gave you a spray, in defence of FF. Luckily I caught on that you were using irony. Lol

 

[Perhaps]

Wonder why this comes up lately. When I have a look on an old shareholder list from January, it's full of Nominees. One company could use different Nominees if wanted. So if someone cares for this, he/she should be nervous for months, not for days cause of a single 10% holding.
I see it as a confirmation of my investment. Would be a warning sign when at this stage only small retail investors are interested in the company.

 

[stuart888]

Good morning....

After our AGM concluded in late May I contacted the company (an individual) with my concern that or more to the point a question directly, squarely at, why the CEO threw in the line that the company was intending to employ a further 4 Non-Executive directors before this year was out, and "possibly" a fifth...as soon as that comment was made, my mind started cherning, why would we want to double the Board size, it seemed to me to be a little premature...Had another company or potential large investor put the word on the Board that if something were to play out over the next 6/12 months that this alleged company or large investor wanted or demanded a number of seats on the Board moving foward.

Anyway, the shutters went up (as predicted) and very recently I followed up with two specific questions to the company to see if they were prepared to elaborate on what clearly has been a change in direction, for example, no longer a chip company, as such, but solely an IP company.

In my opinion this business direction, that is, casually mentioning a plan surrounding the massive Board expansion, and I mean, pretty casually just throwing it out there at the AGM with really no foundation, well, I'm 100% convinced that something rather major is on the near horizon, as it's definitely 100% sensitive, whatever is going down, the Citicorp Nominees holding of over 174 Million that was recently exposed, surpassing our great Founder and long time No.1 stakeholder Peter Van, without even a whisper, tells me the roller coaster ride many of us have been on over the last 7 plus years, is about to become more curvier, hang on..somethings definitely at play, what I don't know, but my personal trust in both Peter and Anil leads me to think, great things are fast approaching.

From a wet & cold Sunday morning in Perth.....Tech x

Thanks so much Tech, keeping us on this important topic. I got the impression that this was all needed to be Uplifted into Nasdaq. The new diversity rules seeming force companies to spend more money on the Board in order to have the application qualify. Seems like expanding the board is forward thinking, with the pending revenue stream getting ready to start in the pending months/quarters.