AVZ would be batshit crazy to stop ICC/ICSID until money is in the bank. We’ve been burnt by promises too many timesWe're still continuing down the road of ICSID just in case. Says to me a deal isn't done quite yet
Probably done by RioLOL What a total crock of shit.
Also no one is putting that much effort into creating a website for a lowball valuation unless they're being paid to do it.
So our new low-ball anchor price has moved from 0.60c (from the random journalist) to $1.35 from some random git who i speculate is being paid to try and set low expectation. Keep doubling it a few more times and we'll start getting somewhere.
Strange carry on indeed, something is worth whatever someone is willing to pay for it, isnt that what they sayLOL What a total crock of shit.
Also no one is putting that much effort into creating a website for a lowball valuation unless they're being paid to do it.
So our new low-ball anchor price has moved from 0.60c (from the random journalist) to $1.35 from some random git who i speculate is being paid to try and set low expectation. Keep doubling it a few more times and we'll start getting somewhere.
And why just factor in current lithium prices!? The plan would have been to go to mine and over the years lithium prices would go well beyond all time highs, thats what we all invested in, there's much more value to us to go to mine, and that's why we need to be heavily compensated if they want this thing, IMO
Where’s Nigel in these discussions? Is there any intel? I have not found anything. I assume that’s the usual for these type of talks and potential deals but would be good to get a wink from Nigel at least.
Good man Jakob you've just bumped the price up
AVZ would be batshit crazy to stop ICC/ICSID until money is in the bank. We’ve been burnt by promises too many times
I can see the error of my ways, and I accept I have zero logical thoughts! Please do enlighten us all J. What have you come across in said upcoming offer? What have those more enlightened told you? Do we all need to brace?I know there was no point where any logical thought occurred. My question was rhetorical.
Have I read much else you ask? Well, I have read enough to know that the Avenger's post that you originally quoted referred to $29.75b gross revenue for the LIFE OF THE MINE. Therefore there would be no intelligent reason to multiply that figure by 29.
I am on the light side. I am excited by what figure we might ACTUALLY get, not made up figures with no bearing in reality or logic.
I must say it is ironic that you question my constructive input, the best things I could post and what I have read, given your own recent posts.
As it happens I read a fair bit. I read a lot more than I write. I ask key questions to those who may have valuable information (this post is not one of those times).
Maybe in these discussions I have come across more information than you about the upcoming offer.
And where have everyone else's expectations come from?Probably anyone with a brain
When the revenue figure of $840b (or $300b for that matter) in your post was SO far away from anyone else's expectation, was there ever a point in the thought process where you went...hang on...there might be a fundamental error in the methodology/calculation here?
![]()
Unless trump wants to dig up Manono with his own tools, he's going to need a legitimate mining firm involved. Those firms are beholden to ICSID decisions.Have to say it and really interested to get some insight outside of the screaming troll responses that usually accompany any significant questions that are hurty. If trump is tearing agreements with EU and withdrawing from agreements. What’s stopping him and crew from just taking this at DRCs opinion that these courts don’t exist and neither does our “good legal title” what would make them honour our first right of refusal?