My understanding of the case is that we filed against DRC for unlawful termination of 13359. So recent events like splitting and selling 15775 on the premise of termination violate the ongoing legal case, and hence the emergency request.
Seems pretty simple, not sure how good the DRC's team is and whether they are also using the delay tactics employed by Zijin. DRC also cited 'urgency' in the matter in their termination, so it makes it hard to request delays. Or at least that's how i'd argue the fucking thing.
Hoping for a favourable ruling - not sure what we asked for at ICSID, i'd say a cease order against DRC similar to the one we already got against Cominiere.
Writing this now, it feels like ICSID could be a domino. Z from memory opposed increasing emergency injunction against Cominiere because ‘the progress made and termination have all been orchestrated by the State not Cominiere, so the penalty against Cominiere is not valid given they are not the ones performing the actions, merely the recipient of favourable actions of the Government.' - obviously not verbatim, but that's the logic behind Fasken's argument in Paris.
