AVZ Discussion 2022

[Deleted member 2428]

These guys are insane doing this Road Show . If they had any brains they would cancel the rest of it and the AGM and hide in the Congo jungle . IMO

100%, expecting to see emails cancelling remaining RSs next week in Melbourne, Brisbane and Sydney - as after tonight, they will have the message loud and clear that SHs are sick to fucking death of the AVZ lies and bullshit “imminent” crap, year after year, month after month and week after week. Useless pricks (rich, fully paid pricks, with millions of free shares too!) .

 

[Winenut]

Clear case of cognitive dissonance here: For starters I said “vexatious” not, ”annoying”.



I offered Cong’s phone number via an intermediary, non public disclosure. Or find it yourself, with a tip, learn Chinese.



For the record, you never asked me for the number, so fail to understand the whining.



For the record, yes you’re vexatious,— I don’t see any attempt by me to incite legal action in shareholders. I do see a six month suspension as likely inciting that sentiment however. But you’re here to put a lid on such sentiment?



I do see however, others mumbling about use of implements in AVZ meetings and everyone accepting that has healthy.



RE legal recourse, if so, why would you be against it if it’s valid? This is not a casino. The great thing about the suspension no cunts here or elsewhere can say. “Just sell if you don’t like it”.



This is why I think you’re some kind of shill for the company or just selfishly for yourself.



If someone takes action or will be inclined it is because they really feel they have made a loss not because of me or anyone else here. WHO ARE YOU to REPRESS?



Deal with the reality, people have had their investment suspended for 6 months, why on EARTH would it not be on everyone’s mind? Unless they have access to company koolaid ? Which some here have been trying to trickle in. I can tell.



I think ChrisU said it well, people are smarting up about what to expect from an ASX company. Discussion on disclosure has its “own momentum”.



I for one have said several times, the company looks to have done the best it can under the conditions it has to combat the little mafia and likely has support from ASIC since last year.



That doesn’t mean then all we should do is sing kumbayah and eat pineapples or jackfruit instead of asking about stewardship in general. The long termers know what I mean.

Oh fuck here we go

Superman changed in the fucking phone booth and R2D2 became Modo became Geist who became Chris who was orginally fucking Linda ...

I'll wait for a further update from the real people at the Perth roadshow

The people at the Perth roadshow are actually real people......not agenda driven paid up trolls with a penchant for bastardisation and misinformation

 

[Modo]

If we trade the SP goes back to 7ents . Nigel and Crew are finished . They will get their arses sued for rest of their lives. No chance we come out of suspension until we either win or become extinct . IMO

Im glad a well liked poster tells the hard truth, as i would be banished as a troll.

But you have pretty much summed it up where AVZ shareholders are at.

Oh, the BOD will still be drawing their salaries, while it drags out potentially for years, that bit you missed.

 

[The Fox]

Sorry Red, bullies should never be ignored, some times they have been bullied themselves, sometimes they are just cowards, but ignoring them allows them to go on and bully others who may then carry unnecessary pain into their and other's lives.... Just my opinion

Well known bullies.... Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Harvey Weinstein, Vladimir Putin....

@Flexi, Kinshasa is 10hrs behind Sydney time and 7hrs Perth time, so if anything happened in the DRC over the weekend, like the ML being signed soon (as was alluded to in a tweet by Marius Mihigo), then it wouldn't be announced until later in the day.

If the ML is about to be signed, it would explain the bullshit coming out on the SCMP website today, and if Marius was just bullshitting us ahead of the Roadshow, then it's another question that shareholders can ask

Ah bullies, reminds me of this scene....

 

[MoneyBags1348]

Clear case of cognitive dissonance here: For starters I said “vexatious” not, ”annoying”.



I offered Cong’s phone number via an intermediary, non public disclosure. Or find it yourself, with a tip, learn Chinese.



For the record, you never asked me for the number, so fail to understand the whining.



For the record, yes you’re vexatious,— I don’t see any attempt by me to incite legal action in shareholders. I do see a six month suspension as likely inciting that sentiment however. But you’re here to put a lid on such sentiment?



I do see however, others mumbling about use of implements in AVZ meetings and everyone accepting that has healthy.



RE legal recourse, if so, why would you be against it if it’s valid? This is not a casino. The great thing about the suspension no cunts here or elsewhere can say. “Just sell if you don’t like it”.



This is why I think you’re some kind of shill for the company or just selfishly for yourself.



If someone takes action or will be inclined it is because they really feel they have made a loss not because of me or anyone else here. WHO ARE YOU to REPRESS?



Deal with the reality, people have had their investment suspended for 6 months, why on EARTH would it not be on everyone’s mind? Unless they have access to company koolaid ? Which some here have been trying to trickle in. I can tell.



I think ChrisU said it well, people are smarting up about what to expect from an ASX company. Discussion on disclosure has its “own momentum”.



I for one have said several times, the company looks to have done the best it can under the conditions it has to combat the little mafia and likely has support from ASIC since last year.



That doesn’t mean then all we should do is sing kumbayah and eat pineapples or jackfruit instead of asking about stewardship in general. The long termers know what I mean.

I probably shouldn’t laugh, because you have really lost the plot.

As for your mate (alter ego)…. He proved beyond a doubt today he (or you) is a troll

The ASX section in charge of market disclosures will refer you to ASIC who if you don’t already know will dismiss your emails, get you to fill in an online complaint and then dismiss that.

Alternately it would take about 40 shareholders to raise about $80K to start a class action which I already have a good understanding of what will follow.

Go ahead with it if you like, and go your hardest to find at least 20 other holders to join you.

AVZ have made it clear the surface rights are the reason for the suspension.

I’m only offering help here mate because you seem like you are in need of it.

 

[John25]

Doing whats best for Shareholders …what would they fucking know …3 chairs some BoD couldnt be fucked …think they knew the hostility

 

[Der Geist]

i've been patient and somewhat positive since the initial suspension.

But this is drawing me out.

It makes me wonder how many investors no longer feel confident in AVZ and would dump on the first open regardless of the news.

I, for one, am tempted to do so.

Have you contacted the company secretary? If not just identify yourself with share holding and I’m sure they’ll explain some stuff.

I think if AVz prevails it will have social credit in Congo. Trick is avoiding enemies there, need a broad alliance.

 

[Winenut]

Clear case of cognitive dissonance here: For starters I said “vexatious” not, ”annoying”.

I offered Cong’s phone number via an intermediary, non public disclosure. Or find it yourself, with a tip, learn Chinese. Why would I hand out Cong’s number with Boatman et al watching ?

For the record, you never asked me for the number, so fail to understand the whining.

For the record, yes you’re vexatious,— I don’t see any attempt by me to incite legal action in shareholders. I do see a six month suspension as likely inciting that sentiment however. But you’re here to put a lid on such sentiment?

I do see however, others mumbling about use of implements in AVZ meetings and everyone accepting that has healthy.

RE legal recourse, if so, why would you be against it if it’s valid? This is not a casino. The great thing about the suspension no cunts here or elsewhere can say. “Just sell if you don’t like it”.

This is why I think you’re some kind of shill for the company or just selfishly for yourself.
If someone takes action or will be inclined it is because they really feel they have made a loss not because of me or anyone else here. WHO ARE YOU to REPRESS?
Deal with the reality, people have had their investment suspended for 6 months, why on EARTH would it not be on everyone’s mind? Unless they have access to company koolaid ? Which some here have been trying to trickle in. I can tell. I know all it about and nothing can be done about that.

I think ChrisU said it well, people are smarting up about what to expect from an ASX company. Discussion on disclosure has its “own momentum”.
I for one have said several times, the company looks to have done the best it can under the conditions it has to combat the little mafia and allegedly has support from ASIC since last year.

That doesn’t mean then all we should do is sing kumbayah, eat pineapples or jackfruit instead of asking about stewardship in general. The long termers know what I mean. I gave irrefutable examples. Not once did I report to ASIC, the share price was heading to 3.8cps 2019, “by design”

Straight question

Did you get an invite to any roadshow?

 

[Der Geist]

Wong company

Doing whats best for Shareholders …what would they fucking know …3 chairs some BoD couldnt be fucked …think they knew the hostility

 

[DiscoDanNZ]

Clear case of cognitive dissonance here: For starters I said “vexatious” not, ”annoying”.

I offered Cong’s phone number via an intermediary, non public disclosure. Or find it yourself, with a tip, learn Chinese. Why would I hand out Cong’s number with Boatman et al watching ?

For the record, you never asked me for the number, so fail to understand the whining.

For the record, yes you’re vexatious,— I don’t see any attempt by me to incite legal action in shareholders. I do see a six month suspension as likely inciting that sentiment however. But you’re here to put a lid on such sentiment?

I do see however, others mumbling about use of implements in AVZ meetings and everyone accepting that has healthy.

RE legal recourse, if so, why would you be against it if it’s valid? This is not a casino. The great thing about the suspension no cunts here or elsewhere can say. “Just sell if you don’t like it”.

This is why I think you’re some kind of shill for the company or just selfishly for yourself.
If someone takes action or will be inclined it is because they really feel they have made a loss not because of me or anyone else here. WHO ARE YOU to REPRESS?
Deal with the reality, people have had their investment suspended for 6 months, why on EARTH would it not be on everyone’s mind? Unless they have access to company koolaid ? Which some here have been trying to trickle in. I can tell. I know all it about and nothing can be done about that.

I think ChrisU said it well, people are smarting up about what to expect from an ASX company. Discussion on disclosure has its “own momentum”.
I for one have said several times, the company looks to have done the best it can under the conditions it has to combat the little mafia and allegedly has support from ASIC since last year.

That doesn’t mean then all we should do is sing kumbayah, eat pineapples or jackfruit instead of asking about stewardship in general. The long termers know what I mean. I gave irrefutable examples. Not once did I report to ASIC, the share price was heading to 3.8cps 2019, “by design”

And I suppose you think ChrisU is also a fine going-sort of a chap or whatever round about way it was he described you mid Dutch rudder yesterday.

Isn't it odd that you one always back each others character references

 

[CHB]

Can't win really.

If we had traded for the past few months we would probably be decimated too and some probably would have called for a TH to stop the decline hahaha

 

[oxxa23]

I still think there's a chance of ML next week... based on media, obe's cryptic msg and the insanity of them holding roadshows.... what I don't understand is why they'd do perth a week ahead of the rest... or are they doing nz between Perth and eastern Australia...

Wait for the Perth feedback gents... pointless working yourself up until news...

 

[DiscoDanNZ]

Can't win really.

If we had traded for the past few months we would probably be decimated too and some probably would have called for a TH to stop the decline hahaha

Sell the reopening dip, buy the prolonged bigger dip was going to be my plan

I just don't understand why they don't just explain clearly why the ML hasn't been granted yet and what the problems are.

I think that would go a long way to easing SH frustration, at some point we need info even if the company is in the middle of a chess match with a grand master of corruption/bribery/being sheisters

 

[John25]

BoD taking piss …collecting their monthly $25-30K salary + expenses for what …half cant be fucked turning up to Road Show

 

[Soapy]

I still think there's a chance of ML next week... based on media, obe's cryptic msg and the insanity of them holding roadshows.... what I don't understand is why they'd do perth a week ahead of the rest... or are they doing nz between Perth and eastern Australia...

Wait for the Perth feedback gents... pointless working yourself up until news...

Yes NZ after Perth I believe

 

[ThisTimeWin]

If we trade the SP goes back to 7ents . Nigel and Crew are finished . They will get their arses sued for rest of their lives. No chance we come out of suspension until we either win or become extinct . IMO

7 cents is pure speculation.

Nigel or who the fuck else are "finished" or not is certainly not a basis for the board to decide whether the stock can trade or not.

If we trade @ x cents or zero cents the BOD will be examined as to whether they have complied with relevant legislation.

Not up to play with Aussie commercial law so will leave it at that however having worked in NZ as in-house legal commercial manager (LLB) and also as a stockbroker (ACA) in my time I would put it to others that in NZ a listed company does not stay in perpetual suspension surrounding "winning" or "extinction".

 

[Azzler]

I still think there's a chance of ML next week... based on media, obe's cryptic msg and the insanity of them holding roadshows.... what I don't understand is why they'd do perth a week ahead of the rest... or are they doing nz between Perth and eastern Australia...

Wait for the Perth feedback gents... pointless working yourself up until news...

I'm feeling the same as you.
Man it's a riot at the station right now.
I recon they quickly wen't to issue at the RS based on jags bruce lee gif 5 minuts in.

But yeah, why in the absolute fuck of pineappled assholes, are they even holding this roadshow??
It makes no sense if this is all they got.

 

[Der Geist]

I probably shouldn’t laugh, but you have really lost the plot haven’t you

As for your mate (alter ego)…. He proved beyond a doubt today he (you) is a troll

And I suppose you think ChrisU is also a fine going-sort of a chap or whatever round about way it was he described you mid Dutch rudder yesterday.

Isn't it odd that you one always back each others character references

I back intelligent people. When I see an intelligent post I acknowledge it accordingly.

Obviously people are obsessed with who is who. I could koolaid too then people care less who I am or others are?

I know who the koolaiders are, I talk to them, I message them, for years. I have also enabled them. I also enabled everyone here when I tweeted that draft on AFRTom to try to equalise the power of the AFR platform. I’m hoping Bloomberg takes AVZ’s side.

Focussing on me, pays no dividend.

The point is: the message. What’s the message conveying?

 

[Der Geist]

And I suppose you think ChrisU is also a fine going-sort of a chap or whatever round about way it was he described you mid Dutch rudder yesterday.

Isn't it odd that you one always back each others character references

Lol. He is monofocal. We need people like that.

 

[Winenut]

Have you contacted the company secretary? If not just identify yourself with share holding and I’m sure they’ll explain some stuff.

I think if AVz prevails it will have social credit in Congo. Trick is avoiding enemies there, need a broad alliance.

Straight question

Did you get an invite to any roadshow?

Why can't you answer the simplest of questions...