Der Geist
Regular


I’m being monitored.
Actually I noted others here had done same so I thought it was a good idea to share the love back.
Thanks for confirming it works.
Look folks, most here know I’m sincere,
I’m a large holder and I want AVZ to succeed but I’m not scared of fronting them or being scathing if I think it is warranted.
I’ve put this post in bold because it probably means more to me than anything else I’ve posted on TSE.
I personally believe Der Geist and R2D2 (and his new alias Chris U) have an agenda to try and steer shareholders into accusing AVZ of acting illegally in regards to their market sensitive disclosures.
I would not be surprised if he (or they, which ever is the case) turns up to a Roadshow or the AGM with this in mind and is hoping they will have backing from other shareholders to push their agenda.
The reason for this is bullshit for us, as frustrated and angry as we may be, it would totally oppose our purpose of moving forward and our chances of getting answers on so many levels.
A simple person may think it’s an attempt to cause a drop in SP coming out of suspension creating a buy opportunity but that’s a weak reason.
Der Geist has admitted he has colluded with Simon Cong, and a few hours ago he limited access to his account here so you cannot access his posts through his account.
This is what he has previously posted:
“When I started getting info from Cong, I could tell there were issues with their documents straight away, I even offered to advise him on what the issues are”
“He accepted but I never got around to it. The paper trail was getting to interesting. Moreover the court judgment that AVZ didn’t attend”
He also communicated with the Australian Financial Review’s Tom (who we know colluded with Boatman) saying
“When AFR-Tom climbed on with his hit piece, it was clear to me, that I had to separate my views from the real troll camp”
“When I contacted Tom to offer him a better perspective, he was such an arrogant twat, that I resolved to distance my questions from such idiocy”
I’ve tried to help fellow shareholders here by offering information as well as some humour along the way, but there comes a point where you all have to make an informed judgment and not keep sitting on the fence.
Goodnight and good luck all, in the end we have to stick together and fight for this company, especially from the corruption we are up against![]()
Hi Retro, I have been a little puzzled with this photo of a burnt out car with right hand drive configuration.
Define "retail"Anyone know roughly how much of the registry retail investors account for? Is there some way to work this out?
Indeed, this article is interesting.Define "retail"
Therein lies the difficulty of answering the question my friend
yep. wrong sideHi Retro, I have been a little puzzled with this photo of a burnt out car with right hand drive configuration.
I would be rather surprised if AVZ drives right hand drive cars in the DRC.
Traffic in the DRC is a on the right hand side of the road and cars require left hand drive configuration.
Please read the following article from 2007 regarding right hand drive cars in the DRC:
JULY 4, 200712:08 FROM 15 YEARS AGO
Congo angers easterners with right-hand drive ban
By Reuters Staff
2 MIN READ
KINSHASA (Reuters) - Democratic Republic of Congo is banning right-hand drive cars in an effort to improve dire road safety, angering drivers in the vast country’s south and east where most vehicles have the steering wheel on the right.
Congolese drive on the right-hand side of the road. The majority of cars in the west of the former Belgian colony, where the capital Kinshasa is located, are imported from continental Europe and are therefore left-hand drive.
But vehicles in the south and east are mostly brought in from Asia via neighbouring Kenya, Tanzania and Zambia, former British colonies where cars are right-hand drive.
“Vehicles with the steering wheel on the right are the cause of a lot of accidents on our country’s roads,” Gilles-Benjamin Saidi Kampene, president of the national road safety commission, told Reuters on Tuesday.
“We have granted a 12-month period to give them time to put the steering wheel on the left, and after that they will be banned,” he said.
Now that was 15 years ago.
I don't say it is not an AVZ vehicle, but I take everything on social media with a truck load of salt, especially after reading the above article.
Yes you’ve got an interesting set of questions.ANYWAY....
Here is some more speculation from me that you top blokes and ladies might enjoy...
What if the Zijin/Comminarie, as well as the Dathomir/Cong issues, are really no issue at all, and never truly were.
Which is why it was indeed immaterial and why BOD didn't bother to inform the market.
We don't yet truly know what this massive extension is really about.
What if it is only about the tenement CDL cut-off thing?
I'm saying this because a lot of us are furious we werent alerted to these issues with ownership % earlier... but what if they're nothing to do with the hold up?
I'm just speculating, but I'd say we are mostly assuming it is to do with that. But it might not be.
I guess I'm just saying, let's wait and see.
I appreciate your post, just wanted to highlight this odd fact and because of that, my scepticism of the article.Facebook group for Manono
Log in to Facebook
Log in to Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family and people you know.www.facebook.com
That's tomorrow .ahhh 2 minutes left for extension announcement...?
As we are in suspension I dont think the time of day matters, current extension is until tomorrow also.ahhh 2 minutes left for extension announcement...?