My policy is if it's Chinese I don't trust it . Wouldn't trust Cath as far as I could throw them . If we have a better option we should pay them out and fk them off . Cong is a little dirt bag that needs to be squashed . IMOSurprised there's been little reaction to tendoji's suggestive post re CATL/CATH links to Cong.
Perhaps, like me, no-one is really surprised to hear that. I have held those thoughts right from the very start, without knowing of any connection - just a suspicious prick, thats me.
Perhaps Nige is going to kick them to touch, and go with a new partner (just pay them the $20m break fee, and recoup it from selling a portion of the project for a much higher price) I accept it isn't looking likely, but might be a sniff of a chance to break away from Sino influences
I won't put money on any new partner being Piedmont either, judging from their comments on the bird - they reckon their approach is via a welcome from the DRC, not B2B, so I guess they will apply for one of the ~300 mining tenements clawed back by Antionette
Notably, those two large square tenements adjacent to us to the west, that used to be held by Mincom (I think), appear to now be under application - perhaps it's PLL
Also wonder if Cong/Klaus will get in between parties as in the past - nothing seems to have come out since the MOU on their 'ahem, partnership'
random thoughts whilst we wait for godot
Interested in others' thoughts - foxy/nells/roller/deboss? am I on a path or on drugs?
A little bit of googling yields a bit of results.
It would be nice if the northern CDL tenement was no longer under Dathcom but AVZ, more security for us that way.
Yep, like it....A little bit of googling yields a bit of results.
Tom Richardson, Author at The Motley Fool Australia
See the latest work and learn more about Tom Richardson, author and daily contributor to The Motley Fool Australia.www.fool.com.au
Not sure of the following website is him : but the username is uncanny.
Side note - if he purports that he had emailed avz a few days prior to the report (which avz was well in their rights andc correctly should have done )
That means that Tommy received the info earlier than it was published on the boatman report (if that is the same matter he is referring to) ... Meaning he got that info from a source direct.
Suspicious, if anything.
If you are strapped for time please skip this as it isn't worth your time and has no value what-so-ever, If you're bored step right up you're the target demographic!
Wrote an announcement for the next extension leaving the team free to work on getting us back into trading hopefully before 3122.
Dear Steph,
THE DRAGGING ON OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO VOLNTARY SUSPESION
AVZ Minerls Limited (ASX: AVZ, OTCQX: AZZVF) (“AVZ” or “Company”) refers to the Company’s request for another bloody extension to its voluntary suspesion dated 1O October 2022, in relation to thefinalisation and release of anannouncement that has been in the 'mail' for what feels like several millennia now with respect to its mining and exploration rights for the Manno Lithium and Tin Project (Manono Project).
We promise it's still a project, as so much time has passed we have now renamed the project to more accurately portray its standing ; the Perpetual Manono Lihium, Tin and Promises Project (PML project not to be confused with the other abbreviation for PML ; Piss Myself Laughing.)
The Company advises with substantial astonishment that the subjct of the initial trading halt request remains incomplete and requests a further extension to te voluntary suspension until the commencement of trade on 21 October 3122 or very unlikely an earlier announcement to the market regarding its mining and exploration rights for the PML Project.
The Company is super-duper confident of a positive outcome for it’s long passed away shareholders and their great great grandchildren, resulting in the re-instatement of trading in its securities.
The Company is not awareof any reason why the voluntary suspension should not be granted, nor of any other information necessary to inform the market about the voluntary suspension.
This request has ben authorised for release to ASX by the Compny’s Board of Dirctors.
Yours sincrely,
BEN Dover
Joint Company Secretar
Wait up, did they say SUPER-DUPER !!!If you are strapped for time please skip this as it isn't worth your time and has no value what-so-ever, If you're bored step right up you're the target demographic!
Wrote an announcement for the next extension leaving the team free to work on getting us back into trading hopefully before 3122.
Dear Steph,
THE DRAGGING ON OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO VOLNTARY SUSPESION
AVZ Minerls Limited (ASX: AVZ, OTCQX: AZZVF) (“AVZ” or “Company”) refers to the Company’s request for another bloody extension to its voluntary suspesion dated 1O October 2022, in relation to thefinalisation and release of anannouncement that has been in the 'mail' for what feels like several millennia now with respect to its mining and exploration rights for the Manno Lithium and Tin Project (Manono Project).
We promise it's still a project, as so much time has passed we have now renamed the project to more accurately portray its standing ; the Perpetual Manono Lihium, Tin and Promises Project (PML project not to be confused with the other abbreviation for PML ; Piss Myself Laughing.)
The Company advises with substantial astonishment that the subjct of the initial trading halt request remains incomplete and requests a further extension to te voluntary suspension until the commencement of trade on 21 October 3122 or very unlikely an earlier announcement to the market regarding its mining and exploration rights for the PML Project.
The Company is super-duper confident of a positive outcome for it’s long passed away shareholders and their great great grandchildren, resulting in the re-instatement of trading in its securities.
The Company is not awareof any reason why the voluntary suspension should not be granted, nor of any other information necessary to inform the market about the voluntary suspension.
This request has ben authorised for release to ASX by the Compny’s Board of Dirctors.
Yours sincrely,
BEN Dover
Joint Company Secretar
Mate this suspension is the last one for me before I'm officially fking p1ssed off . Cong should be tipped upside down in a garbage bin by now .As for the September ICC Case Conference . I'll believe it when I see it .If you are strapped for time please skip this as it isn't worth your time and has no value what-so-ever, If you're bored step right up you're the target demographic!
Wrote an announcement for the next extension leaving the team free to work on getting us back into trading hopefully before 3122.
Dear Steph,
THE DRAGGING ON OF REQUEST FOR EXTENSION TO VOLNTARY SUSPESION
AVZ Minerls Limited (ASX: AVZ, OTCQX: AZZVF) (“AVZ” or “Company”) refers to the Company’s request for another bloody extension to its voluntary suspesion dated 1O October 2022, in relation to thefinalisation and release of anannouncement that has been in the 'mail' for what feels like several millennia now with respect to its mining and exploration rights for the Manno Lithium and Tin Project (Manono Project).
We promise it's still a project, as so much time has passed we have now renamed the project to more accurately portray its standing ; the Perpetual Manono Lihium, Tin and Promises Project (PML project not to be confused with the other abbreviation for PML ; Piss Myself Laughing.)
The Company advises with substantial astonishment that the subjct of the initial trading halt request remains incomplete and requests a further extension to te voluntary suspension until the commencement of trade on 21 October 3122 or very unlikely an earlier announcement to the market regarding its mining and exploration rights for the PML Project.
The Company is super-duper confident of a positive outcome for it’s long passed away shareholders and their great great grandchildren, resulting in the re-instatement of trading in its securities.
The Company is not awareof any reason why the voluntary suspension should not be granted, nor of any other information necessary to inform the market about the voluntary suspension.
This request has ben authorised for release to ASX by the Compny’s Board of Dirctors.
Yours sincrely,
BEN Dover
Joint Company Secretar
It doesn't appear the government are behind AVZ at all. All this has been going on for well over 12 months.Mate this suspension is the last one for me before I'm officially fking p1ssed off . Cong should be tipped upside down in a garbage bin by now .As for the September ICC Case Conference . I'll believe it when I see it .
A little bit of googling yields a bit of results.
Tom Richardson, Author at The Motley Fool Australia
See the latest work and learn more about Tom Richardson, author and daily contributor to The Motley Fool Australia.www.fool.com.au
Not sure of the following website is him : but the username is uncanny.
Side note - if he purports that he had emailed avz a few days prior to the report (which avz was well in their rights andc correctly should have done )
That means that Tommy received the info earlier than it was published on the boatman report (if that is the same matter he is referring to) ... Meaning he got that info from a source direct.
Suspicious, if anything.
Looks like this fella sat on a pineapple or something.Poor Foxy after doubling down yesterday….
View attachment 16616
Anything on the vine? At least this extension cover BM's birthday. Still confident with the date?Looks like this fella sat on a pineapple or something.
Well in two days, something has changed IMO, interesting. Has there been anything of interest reported out of the DRC in the last two days?
I hope the extra time needed is put to good use and provides more value to shareholders than just formal resolution of the ownership issues.
Cheers The Fox
Looking back - your interpretation is probably correct."Side note - if he purports that he had emailed avz a few days prior to the report (which avz was well in their rights andc correctly should have done )
That means that Tommy received the info earlier than it was published on the boatman report (if that is the same matter he is referring to) ... Meaning he got that info from a source direct."
That is not my reading at all of his tweet
I don't think he is purporting to have emailed AVZ beforehand at all
My reading is as follows
There was a short report prepared by boatman. That report was provided (by someone) to AVZ some days prior to publishing with 6 questions asked which AVZ could respond to
AVZ did not respond in any way to the queries within some precribed timeframe so then the report was published
Doesn't mean Tommy got the info before hand.....he's reporting after the fact what transpired
Maybe he got the report direct from boatman at the same time the report and the queries were sent to AVZ but I don't necessairly think he's saying that...... and I certainly don't think he's saying "he" emailed AVZ prior to the release of the Boatman Report
Also I'm confused and not sure who you are inferring the "direct source" for little Tommy might be????
Boatman??? Someone at AVZ??? Anyone else????
Of course other people may form a different view
Fox if you are saying your intel is telling you the U.S.A want a piece of AVZ's action why don't you just come out and say it ?Looks like this fella sat on a pineapple or something.
Well in two days, something has changed IMO, interesting. Has there been anything of interest reported out of the DRC in the last two days?
I hope the extra time needed is put to good use and provides more value to shareholders than just formal resolution of the ownership issues.
Cheers The Fox
Hey Fox I reckon you might be 4th time lucky this time .Looks like this fella sat on a pineapple or something.
Well in two days, something has changed IMO, interesting. Has there been anything of interest reported out of the DRC in the last two days?
I hope the extra time needed is put to good use and provides more value to shareholders than just formal resolution of the ownership issues.
Cheers The Fox