The part about AVZ "allegedly" making an offer to settle doesn't ring true to me . Under the circumstances of Congs/Dathmoir claims being "without foundation or merit " I really don't see Nigel would have made an offer to settle . That would be counter intuitive . Would give Cong credibility . My take is Nigel initially ignored them , then told them to f--k off .Can someone care to explain what is being said here? So even after the sale of the 15% to AVZI, Cong was soliciting interests from chinese entities on that same 15%? And what's this offer AVZI made if legitimately own the 15%? I'd be telling Cong to F off.