AVZ Discussion 2022

[tolate]

You posting to XEROF or to yourself, just a bit confused but i guess i am a AVZ S H...!

 

[Azzler]

AVZ is stopping them
They do not have 100% and never will.
Read the announcement, my previous post on off takes, and go look at who else has binding off takes on their website

This is the last stupid post I'm going to reply to. Someone else might be able to ease your anxiety, but you are on ignore now sorry, as I think you have a Tolate-esque agenda

Yes, cause doubt, uncertainty and anxiety in shareholders.
That is literally Tolates mandate, even if you go back to before he was identified, that's exactly what he was doing, and that was all he was doing.

This poster is pretty much trying to do the same thing.
Particularly in this latest post which is really dumb, because a legitamate concerned holder would have thought his idea through for a few moments and realised the idea is nonsense.

Posting only to cause anxiety and uncertainty, moving from one topic to the next each week. It's looking a lot like another account from one of the gang of psycho tards.

 

[Winenut]

 

[PhatCatz]

Thanks for the responses but unsure on the jabs. I’m not related in any way shape or form to any of those Chinese puppets. I apologise for asking a question. In hindsight it seems a stupid one.

 

[Retrobyte]

Shane getting very upset, can only mean good news right?

I don't visit X much these days but went for a look. The number of posts from Shane in such a short period of time prove he is blatantly triggered by the surprise events of the past week. Most of his posts seem to be written the same way David Bowie wrote Diamond Dogs ....

 

[Dhuboy]

Zijin selling up in Aus - seen the writing on the wall?

Minerals 260 has executed binding documentation to acquire 100% of the Bullabulling Gold
Project from Norton Gold Fields Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.

 

[Winenut]

Anyone out there know the % holdings in CATH between Mr Pei and CATL??

CATH is jointly owned by both but I'm not sure of %'s

Any help appreciated

Cheers
Nut

 

[Dazmac66]

Anyone out there know the % holdings in CATH between Mr Pei and CATL??

CATH is jointly owned by both but I'm not sure of %'s

Any help appreciated

Cheers
Nut

I think someone said it was 50/50. Don't quote me.

 

[Winenut]

I think someone said it was 50/50. Don't quote me.

Could be right

I've seen it come up a few times described as "jointly owned"

I never necessarily thought that would be 50/50

 

[Winenut]

Does this make sense to anyone?

If I've rooted this one let me know....if you can be bothered

 

[Winenut]

I'm just trying to keep my head straight on "ownership and control" issues in the whole deal

 

[Hodlandwin69]

Chuck in AVZ Power, and the other lot for fun

 

[Flight996]

Anyone out there know the % holdings in CATH between Mr Pei and CATL??

CATH is jointly owned by both but I'm not sure of %'s

Any help appreciated

Cheers
Nut

I asked the same question a couple of days ago, but got no response. I asked two AI websites for their interpretation, and this is the consensus:

CATH's joint ownership is neither a traditional joint venture nor a partnership. It is a collaborative ownership arrangement between Mr. Pei Zhenhua and CATL (my bold).

I understand that 50/50 can be inferred, but it is not expressly stated anywhere that I can find.

Cheers
F

 

[Winenut]

I asked the same question a couple of days ago, but got no response. I asked two AI websites for their interpretation, and this is the consensus:

CATH's joint ownership is neither a traditional joint venture nor a partnership. It is a collaborative ownership arrangement between Mr. Pei Zhenhua and CATL (my bold).

I understand that 50/50 can be inferred, but it is not expressly stated anywhere that I can find.

Cheers
F

pretty much what I came to

The 50/50 is just what i'm running with now in the absence of any better info

 

[Winenut]

I asked the same question a couple of days ago, but got no response. I asked two AI websites for their interpretation, and this is the consensus:

CATH's joint ownership is neither a traditional joint venture nor a partnership. It is a collaborative ownership arrangement between Mr. Pei Zhenhua and CATL (my bold).

I understand that 50/50 can be inferred, but it is not expressly stated anywhere that I can find.

Cheers
F

For the exercise it doesn't matter "too" much at the moment

Nevertheless understanding who has real control in CATH does tell us who has real control in the decision making concerning its interest and holding in GLH

 

[Xerof]

Chuck in AVZ Power, and the other lot for fun

Yes, important. No mention of which ones, but you’d expect Power, and those logistics companies to be moved under GLH

 

[Xerof]

For the exercise it doesn't matter "too" much at the moment

Nevertheless understanding who has real control in CATH does tell us who has real control in the decision making concerning its interest and holding in GLH

Ask Shane, he’s great at discovering things on Chinese websites

 

[Frank]

x.com

x.com

 

[Hudnut]

I had the same thought. Settlement paid to AVZ by direct payment, let them work through the courts to get their undeserved tax. We could make a killing on the interest in the 32 years it takes go through the ICSID.

We could always offer to negotiate an MOU for it.....

 

[cruiser51]

Ask Shane, he’s great at discovering things on Chinese websites

Shane is out of the picture, Shane is still stuck in 2018.
It hasn't clicked with him yet that it is 2025.