AVZ Discussion 2022

PhatCatz

Member
If we take this mining, what's stopping CATH from lowballing the offtake pricing now we are 100% committed to them? Wouldn't they just bleed the company dry and buy it out for cheapies?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Dazmac66

Regular
Only deadbeats don’t pay their taxes imo 👻
I had the same thought. Settlement paid to AVZ by direct payment, let them work through the courts to get their undeserved tax. We could make a killing on the interest in the 32 years it takes go through the ICSID.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

Xerof

Have a Cigar 1975
If we take this mining, what's stopping CATH from lowballing the offtake pricing now we are 100% committed to them? Wouldn't they just bleed the company dry and buy it out for cheapies?
AVZ is stopping them
They do not have 100% and never will.
Read the announcement, my previous post on off takes, and go look at who else has binding off takes on their website

This is the last stupid post I'm going to reply to. Someone else might be able to ease your anxiety, but you are on ignore now sorry, as I think you have a Tolate-esque agenda
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 42 users

cruiser51

Top 20
If we take this mining, what's stopping CATH from lowballing the offtake pricing now we are 100% committed to them? Wouldn't they just bleed the company dry and buy it out for cheapies?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 16 users

tolate

Emerged

You posting to XEROF or to yourself, just a bit confused but i guess i am a AVZ S H...!
 

Azzler

Top 20
AVZ is stopping them
They do not have 100% and never will.
Read the announcement, my previous post on off takes, and go look at who else has binding off takes on their website

This is the last stupid post I'm going to reply to. Someone else might be able to ease your anxiety, but you are on ignore now sorry, as I think you have a Tolate-esque agenda
Yes, cause doubt, uncertainty and anxiety in shareholders.
That is literally Tolates mandate, even if you go back to before he was identified, that's exactly what he was doing, and that was all he was doing.

This poster is pretty much trying to do the same thing.
Particularly in this latest post which is really dumb, because a legitamate concerned holder would have thought his idea through for a few moments and realised the idea is nonsense.

Posting only to cause anxiety and uncertainty, moving from one topic to the next each week. It's looking a lot like another account from one of the gang of psycho tards.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 27 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
1736816592839.gif


1736816622359.gif


1736816651622.gif
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 13 users

PhatCatz

Member
Thanks for the responses but unsure on the jabs. I’m not related in any way shape or form to any of those Chinese puppets. I apologise for asking a question. In hindsight it seems a stupid one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Retrobyte

Hates a beer
Shane getting very upset, can only mean good news right?

I don't visit X much these days but went for a look. The number of posts from Shane in such a short period of time prove he is blatantly triggered by the surprise events of the past week. Most of his posts seem to be written the same way David Bowie wrote Diamond Dogs ....

1736827450809.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 16 users

Dhuboy

Emerged
Zijin selling up in Aus - seen the writing on the wall?

Minerals 260 has executed binding documentation to acquire 100% of the Bullabulling Gold
Project from Norton Gold Fields Pty Ltd, a wholly owned subsidiary of Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd.
 

Attachments

  • LoadPDF.pdf
    4.2 MB · Views: 76
  • Thinking
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 13 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Anyone out there know the % holdings in CATH between Mr Pei and CATL??

CATH is jointly owned by both but I'm not sure of %'s

Any help appreciated

Cheers
Nut
 
  • Thinking
Reactions: 3 users

Dazmac66

Regular
Anyone out there know the % holdings in CATH between Mr Pei and CATL??

CATH is jointly owned by both but I'm not sure of %'s

Any help appreciated

Cheers
Nut
I think someone said it was 50/50. Don't quote me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
I think someone said it was 50/50. Don't quote me.
Could be right

I've seen it come up a few times described as "jointly owned"

I never necessarily thought that would be 50/50

1736828997380.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
Does this make sense to anyone?

If I've rooted this one let me know....if you can be bothered

1736830141865.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 18 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
I'm just trying to keep my head straight on "ownership and control" issues in the whole deal
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 3 users
Chuck in AVZ Power, and the other lot for fun
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users

Flight996

Regular
Anyone out there know the % holdings in CATH between Mr Pei and CATL??

CATH is jointly owned by both but I'm not sure of %'s

Any help appreciated

Cheers
Nut
I asked the same question a couple of days ago, but got no response. I asked two AI websites for their interpretation, and this is the consensus:

CATH's joint ownership is neither a traditional joint venture nor a partnership. It is a collaborative ownership arrangement between Mr. Pei Zhenhua and CATL (my bold).

I understand that 50/50 can be inferred, but it is not expressly stated anywhere that I can find.

Cheers
F
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
I asked the same question a couple of days ago, but got no response. I asked two AI websites for their interpretation, and this is the consensus:

CATH's joint ownership is neither a traditional joint venture nor a partnership. It is a collaborative ownership arrangement between Mr. Pei Zhenhua and CATL (my bold).

I understand that 50/50 can be inferred, but it is not expressly stated anywhere that I can find.

Cheers
F
pretty much what I came to

The 50/50 is just what i'm running with now in the absence of any better info
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users

Winenut

Go AVZ!
I asked the same question a couple of days ago, but got no response. I asked two AI websites for their interpretation, and this is the consensus:

CATH's joint ownership is neither a traditional joint venture nor a partnership. It is a collaborative ownership arrangement between Mr. Pei Zhenhua and CATL (my bold).

I understand that 50/50 can be inferred, but it is not expressly stated anywhere that I can find.

Cheers
F
For the exercise it doesn't matter "too" much at the moment

Nevertheless understanding who has real control in CATH does tell us who has real control in the decision making concerning its interest and holding in GLH
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users

Xerof

Have a Cigar 1975
Chuck in AVZ Power, and the other lot for fun
Yes, important. No mention of which ones, but you’d expect Power, and those logistics companies to be moved under GLH
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
Top Bottom