AVZ Discussion 2022

[cruiser51]

And the only mine where their personnel are being investigated for CORRUPTION.

Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of blokes. MMGA must be proud to be associated with them too

Just for fun....
Carrot dick's mate's ex company Global Lithium Resources is in the news too.

The Chinese nationals on the board are trying to take control of the board and the company.

Global Lithium Resources (ASX:GL1) has pleaded with the Takeovers Panel to play umpire as the civil war inside the critical minerals explorer’s board rages on.

 

[Hudnut]

Yeah managed to squeeze a day at Freo into a 40th weekend in Boddington. Will do.



Too many CNTS gets confusing

Perhaps, KNTS?

 

[Winenut]

Sorry folks!

There's a pedantic nerd out there that picked up my percentages in GLH added up to 101....

And it wasn't that bloody smart-arse Xerof bloke

So anyway you all have to suffer another posting of my supurb corp structure diagram

Here you go!

 

[Scoota30]

Well, i dodnt recall that, but maybe @EarleofBarrow , or @Scoota30 who were with me at the AGM can.

I attended the AGM, and my notes were cited above.

I'm the first to admit that I have a sh*t memory (as an aside, I'm fortunate to have my wife to remind me about things like 5th April 2022 , which by the way was a tongue in cheek post, not a sob story).

Having said that, my recollection of Nigel's comments is more that he was ruminating (I've always wanted to use that word) on the topic, rather than explicitly stating the facts of the situation.

With the greatest respect, I think we know that Nigel from time to time likes to talk of what may be rather than what is.

As @Carlos Danger once wisely said, trust what's written in an announcement rather than what's said at an AGM.

As @j.l mentions, i believe Nigel was just painting the picture at the current situation. Prior to the CATH JV announcement it was quite obvious to say that as part of any negotiations, that Zijin had a small leg up on the DRC if they wanted to try that avenue.

Since the CATH JV ann though, I am in agreeance with most other people here that Zijin will walk away with their tail between their legs at the order of Xi/CCP, seeing as China still get the product anyway and a large minority ownership.

The only relevant thing that I remember Nigel talking about was that because the Locke Funding was finalised, there was some "other parties" interested in raising capital... He didn't mention anything about CATH though and throwing all of their money at the Stage 1 proposal which leads me to think that Nigel either kept his cards close to his chest (smart thing to do until the ann eventuated anyway) OR; CATH approached us after the AGM or vice versa.

Wonder if we do come out of this, if the DRC will be up for a new MoM though what an absolute shambles of a bloke he has been

 

[Mute22]

Sorry folks!

There's a pedantic nerd out there that picked up my percentages in GLH added up to 101....

And it wasn't that bloody smart-arse Xerof bloke

So anyway you all have to suffer another posting of my supurb corp structure diagram

Here you go!

View attachment 76109

Nice one mate, i've been trying to explain this to the wife and it's kind of like:

 

[Roon]

As @j.l mentions, i believe Nigel was just painting the picture at the current situation. Prior to the CATH JV announcement it was quite obvious to say that as part of any negotiations, that Zijin had a small leg up on the DRC if they wanted to try that avenue.

Since the CATH JV ann though, I am in agreeance with most other people here that Zijin will walk away with their tail between their legs at the order of Xi/CCP, seeing as China still get the product anyway and a large minority ownership.

The only relevant thing that I remember Nigel talking about was that because the Locke Funding was finalised, there was some "other parties" interested in raising capital... He didn't mention anything about CATH though and throwing all of their money at the Stage 1 proposal which leads me to think that Nigel either kept his cards close to his chest (smart thing to do until the ann eventuated anyway) OR; CATH approached us after the AGM or vice versa.

Wonder if we do come out of this, if the DRC will be up for a new MoM though what an absolute shambles of a bloke he has been

I think the probability of Zijin completely throwing in the towel and walking away from Manono is very minimal.

They'll push forward with development of the north, aiming to be such a fact on the ground that they'll not be dislodged with ease. They'll then look to fight for that zone, or at least part of it, whether through negotiations or legal actions.

China play the long game, and i think they'll look to try and control the north directly, and the south at least indirectly - if not directly down the line.

But I feel there's still a path forward here that ends with AVZ getting a reasonable outcome for us long-suffering shareholders, even with that scenario playing out.

 

[Ancient]

In my opinion CATH are positioning for acquisition. Imo there's on going negotiations between avz and drc re. Mining licence and one of the questions that has come from drc is how on earth are you going to fund and build this? Avz responded by getting clarity on the partnership with CATH to show drc government the means.

However, I also believe that CATH fully intend to gain full control of as much of the project as they can. My rationale here is I don't see them needing avz at all in the picture. The only value we bring is the fact we own the project. The long term value to CATH by owning the additional % in the project even if it is the lower of the theorised %'s significantly outweighs the price that most shareholders would probably accept. If that is the case then the next thing I would ask is, is it possible in terms of capital for CATH and that answer is definitely yes. Tldr; that it makes no sense for avz to retain any % as this is against the desires for all parties involved.

 

[Ancient]

To add to my previous post if CATH fund part of the mine construct and processing why would they want avz involved in construction or operations? They specifically wouldn't want that as they would view us (rightfully) as rookie. Also, do they need help finding the additional capital that they've proposed to loan avz in this last announcement in the scenario where they own fully? Absolutely not it's only an additional few hundred m...

 

[JNRB]

Do you mean this one?

Zijin find out they can't steal Manono

A light-hearted look at the moment Zijin discover their bribes and corruption doesnt work anymore in a more democratic DRC under Mr.Tshisekidi with a certain Mr.Alingete from the IGF hunting down criminal behaviour.

www.captiongenerator.com

Cheers,
Nells x

"Mein fuhrer, Mr Aligente is a bad mother fuker"



....but does this mean CATH, are the Yankees?

 

[TheCount]

In my opinion CATH are positioning for acquisition. Imo there's on going negotiations between avz and drc re. Mining licence and one of the questions that has come from drc is how on earth are you going to fund and build this? Avz responded by getting clarity on the partnership with CATH to show drc government the means.

However, I also believe that CATH fully intend to gain full control of as much of the project as they can. My rationale here is I don't see them needing avz at all in the picture. The only value we bring is the fact we own the project. The long term value to CATH by owning the additional % in the project even if it is the lower of the theorised %'s significantly outweighs the price that most shareholders would probably accept. If that is the case then the next thing I would ask is, is it possible in terms of capital for CATH and that answer is definitely yes. Tldr; that it makes no sense for avz to retain any % as this is against the desires for all parties involved.

Welcome to the jungle oh Ancient one.

First rule of TSE is you need to tell everyone more about you and why you're here.

No way will CATH go DIRECTLY mining. They don't know how to do it and are a processor of product. Of course, they may facilitate something down the track with another player.....

TC.

 

[cruiser51]

I think the probability of Zijin completely throwing in the towel and walking away from Manono is very minimal.

They'll push forward with development of the north, aiming to be such a fact on the ground that they'll not be dislodged with ease. They'll then look to fight for that zone, or at least part of it, whether through negotiations or legal actions.

China play the long game, and i think they'll look to try and control the north directly, and the south at least indirectly - if not directly down the line.

But I feel there's still a path forward here that ends with AVZ getting a reasonable outcome for us long-suffering shareholders, even with that scenario playing out.

I concur, therefore I believe AVZ/Cath has to continue to keep their cards close to the chest and move as fast as possible on all fronts being in the DRC, the arbitration courts and China. Definitely without Zijin and/or Cominiere.

In regards of the MoM, so far he had to play with the cards handed to him and he has shown he is as useful as a tit with fingers.
So I would also exclude him out of the discussions.

I wonder how Cami is dealing with CKK totally 'forgetting' he has to hand 10% of his illegal venture to Cami. Very fucking funny.
At the end of the day you can't share something illegally acquired with the Government, without making the Government an accomplice.
Stupid idjets!

CKK has now visions to become an electricity supplier.
It would be the first electrical mob with an unemployable rock polisher in charge.
If I was the Tanganyika government, I would keep an eye on CKK and make sure he doesn't steel the copper out of the transformers and the HV transmission lines.

I wonder who had his/her hands up CKK's arse to move his lips this time.

 

[JNRB]

In my opinion CATH are positioning for acquisition. Imo there's on going negotiations between avz and drc re. Mining licence and one of the questions that has come from drc is how on earth are you going to fund and build this? Avz responded by getting clarity on the partnership with CATH to show drc government the means.

However, I also believe that CATH fully intend to gain full control of as much of the project as they can. My rationale here is I don't see them needing avz at all in the picture. The only value we bring is the fact we own the project. The long term value to CATH by owning the additional % in the project even if it is the lower of the theorised %'s significantly outweighs the price that most shareholders would probably accept. If that is the case then the next thing I would ask is, is it possible in terms of capital for CATH and that answer is definitely yes. Tldr; that it makes no sense for avz to retain any % as this is against the desires for all parties involved.

Zijin needs ownership because they only profit from SELLING the rocks.
CATH (IMO) doesn't care as much about ownership as long as they GET the rocks.

So as long as they know they have that secured, I dont think they really benefit from trying to buy AVZ out completely at this point.

The way the geopolitical landscape is heading it may even offer some advantages to them to be JV with an Aussie company rather than fully Chinese owned. And let's not forget Aussies are no slouches either when it comes to mining.

5-7 years down the line, when mine is producing (and maybe hydroxide plant), the macro climate has settled a bit, and CATH is nearing the end of their exclusive offtake period maybe they'll be more inclined to push to take the whole thing over, if they think its required to keep their required supply going.

The only other reason would be to stop AVZ selling to someone else. We know there are limitations on who CATH can sell to, nothing about AVZ tho. Also dont know it this partnership gives CATH ROFR. But if anyone else decided to make an offer for AVZ's share, CATH can still step in and match/beat it if and when it happens.

 

[Goldenboy]

Welcome to the jungle oh Ancient one.

First rule of TSE is you need to tell everyone more about you and why you're here.

No way will CATH go DIRECTLY mining. They don't know how to do it and are a processor of product. Of course, they may facilitate something down the track with another player.....

TC.

Took the words out of my of my mouth …. CATH process shit and we dig it up. They are not miners , they need us as much as we need them … of course we needed them much more 2 weeks ago
Curve ball ….. watch the Saudis get involved with finance and or a buy out ???

Just thinking out loud ….

 

[Scoota30]

I think the probability of Zijin completely throwing in the towel and walking away from Manono is very minimal.

They'll push forward with development of the north, aiming to be such a fact on the ground that they'll not be dislodged with ease. They'll then look to fight for that zone, or at least part of it, whether through negotiations or legal actions.

China play the long game, and i think they'll look to try and control the north directly, and the south at least indirectly - if not directly down the line.

But I feel there's still a path forward here that ends with AVZ getting a reasonable outcome for us long-suffering shareholders, even with that scenario playing out.

I'm not completely ruling out your take Roon but i'm more so leaning towards Zijin taking a hike, they're still playing their role right now yes, but their role was to steal the project completely from AVZ and as it currently stands there is a high likelihood they will fail that.
As someone else said previously, CATH good cop - Zijin Bad cop. At the end of the day they are still both parts of the same tree & China will still end up with a large minority stake and the product.

 

[cruiser51]

In my opinion CATH are positioning for acquisition. Imo there's on going negotiations between avz and drc re. Mining licence and one of the questions that has come from drc is how on earth are you going to fund and build this? Avz responded by getting clarity on the partnership with CATH to show drc government the means.

However, I also believe that CATH fully intend to gain full control of as much of the project as they can. My rationale here is I don't see them needing avz at all in the picture. The only value we bring is the fact we own the project. The long term value to CATH by owning the additional % in the project even if it is the lower of the theorised %'s significantly outweighs the price that most shareholders would probably accept. If that is the case then the next thing I would ask is, is it possible in terms of capital for CATH and that answer is definitely yes. Tldr; that it makes no sense for avz to retain any % as this is against the desires for all parties involved.

Maybe read the agreement properly and compare with the previous agreement.

I don't think you did that.

 

[TheCount]

Took the words out of my of my mouth …. CATH process shit and we dig it up. They are not miners , they need us as much as we need them … of course we needed them much more 2 weeks ago
Curve ball ….. watch the Saudis get involved with finance and or a buy out ???

Just thinking out loud ….

Saudi anyone?

Watch the video.

 

[Ancient]

Zijin needs ownership because they only profit from SELLING the rocks.
CATH (IMO) doesn't care as much about ownership as long as they GET the rocks.

So as long as they know they have that secured, I dont think they really benefit from trying to buy AVZ out completely at this point.

The way the geopolitical landscape is heading it may even offer some advantages to them to be JV with an Aussie company rather than fully Chinese owned. And let's not forget Aussies are no slouches either when it comes to mining.

5-7 years down the line, when mine is producing (and maybe hydroxide plant), the macro climate has settled a bit, and CATH is nearing the end of their exclusive offtake period maybe they'll be more inclined to push to take the whole thing over, if they think its required to keep their required supply going.

The only other reason would be to stop AVZ selling to someone else. We know there are limitations on who CATH can sell to, nothing about AVZ tho. Also dont know it this partnership gives CATH ROFR. But if anyone else decided to make an offer for AVZ's share, CATH can still step in and match/beat it if and when it happens.

Thanks for the reply - you make good points.

Re. Zijin I think it's very possible they'll keep the north as part of some kind of compromise/negotiation (Which of course is completely fucked).

You and some others commented that CATH won't want to mine because they would rather focus on their core business. Good point. However, I also think they would consider an unknown mining company from Aus quite a high risk to go through the rest of the process if this project is indeed highly strategic for them. It also might not be and rather just be a supply diversification strategy or contingency.

Another good point re having a 'western' partner owning the mine as some countries/companies requirements around supply chains.

What do you mean limitations on who Cath can sell to sorry? I am a little confused on this.

@TheCount what would you like to know?

@cruiser51 sorry mate I didn't get what you were referring to? Ive read the announcements but maybe I misunderstood something

 

[cruiser51]

Thanks for the reply - you make good points.

Re. Zijin I think it's very possible they'll keep the north as part of some kind of compromise/negotiation (Which of course is completely fucked).

You and some others commented that CATH won't want to mine because they would rather focus on their core business. Good point. However, I also think they would consider an unknown mining company from Aus quite a high risk to go through the rest of the process if this project is indeed highly strategic for them. It also might not be and rather just be a supply diversification strategy or contingency.

Another good point re having a 'western' partner owning the mine as some countries/companies requirements around supply chains.

What do you mean limitations on who Cath can sell to sorry? I am a little confused on this.

@TheCount what would you like to know?

@cruiser51 sorry mate I didn't get what you were referring to? Ive read the announcements but maybe I misunderstood something

It is pretty simple.
Take both contracts and see the difference.