ill give him 2 cents for his million.Carrick has apparently got just over a million shares - would say his endeavours will be limited as no point in selling for pennies without tax consideration for 11 months. Unfortunately the prick will profit once we’re taken out though but no chance of rolling the board.
I have done some research Spike and I don’t think our board will get rolled at the AGM, if we even reach that far (Chinese showed their hand, asic and firb interested) plenty of recourse considering many of these shares were accumulated under duplicitous context - just my opinion
The MoU for the Hydro plant exists:Is Franck implying the MOU already exists, or is this lost in translation?
Ah AVZ Power - I misread that.The MoU for the Hydro plant exists:
AVZ Power signs MOU for Mpiana Mwanga Power Station — AVZ Minerals Limited
avzminerals.com.au
Not very inspirational regarding future MoU's if you ask me.
M o fucking U... Ffs!
You forgot option 3 wombat....MoU =stall and delay . Nigel has either 1 of 2 major announcements to make in the very immediate future .
1. A deal has been done and this sh1t show is over .
OR
2. $20MIL funding secured .
TSE needs to add an angry face reaction alreadyYou forgot option 3 wombat....
3. Extension to Locke Funding.
"The company and Locke are completing further due diligence on the previous due diligence completed to finalise a relatively small number of outstanding issues. The company is confident in a positive outcome for the funding and continues to explore other avenues to increase shareholder value, including but not limited to the progression of the MoU with the new DRC Government as dialogue has re-continued, the company is happy to report that the talks have progressed further than last announcement."
Sorry.... had to....
Where else is cash coming from?Wouldn't it be great if we didn't need the Locke funding.
No doubt, should we sign a Locke funding agreement the same people will be complaining about the terms.
Lets wait and see as there is no point in speculating what may happen.
SilentOne
I'm assuming it implies we strike a TO deal in the nearish term and therefore don't need the Locke litigation fundingWhere else is cash coming from?
I'm assuming it implies we strike a TO deal in the nearish term and therefore don't need the Locke litigation funding
This is curious... From the article, Nicolas claims secrecy around the ICC procedings... I'm sure his due diligence surrounding entry was carried out before travelling to Paris?!The article in the Twitter link by GuruDurkan is an excellent read and gives the history of Manono with lots about AVZ (It’s a long read though!)
GuruDukun
@GuruDukun
It explores the geopolitical struggle between China (#Zijin) and Australia ($avz) over these resources. Essential reading for understanding the project's impact and challenges.
https://granta.com/power-metals/?fbclid=IwY2xjawD6DGRleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHQiZ8LUQGcQlwXy-9z3jlbf1Bqef696RsuFZ1i8VAR-YekWNzKiIB7oKeg_aem_gG1obQ6SNRaLqaK5GZKe5Q
https://t.co/bs0V4ybNbQ
Anyone thinking Global Lithium didn’t know what Geoff Jones was up to is kidding themselves. They only sacked him to try and save their own arse because they knew they were involved in an illegal scam and are trying to avoid an investigation.
My own personal view is the Chinese are using Global Lithium as an Australian company to acquire shares in other Australian assets the way Zijin did here with their subsidiary Bellamel who previously scooped up AVZ shares on the quiet.
Remember Zijin owned Norton Goldfields took over Bellamel and Dianmin Chen (who founded Global Lithium & has just been made Executive Director) was the Managing Director of Norton Goldfields
x.com
x.com
Dave Evans
@DaveEva12049801
Is @dfat aware of fraudulent emails sent to AVZ Minerals shareholders by Michael Carrick and Geoff Jones. Brief overview in the link below of attempts by Chinese entities to usurp the AVZ BOD and steal critical minerals
thestockexchange.com.au
ASIC AND AUSTRALIAN TREASURY
Ahhh, so it is... same attendence rules apply for ICC Arbitration... I'll post a screenshot when able!@lucas don velor, wrong court (you quoted the international criminal court)
Ahhh, so it is... same attendence rules apply for ICC Arbitration... I'll post a screenshot when able!
*Correction - ARTICLE 26 - Hearings - 3. of the ICC Arbitration rules states:Ahhh, so it is... same attendence rules apply for ICC Arbitration... I'll post a screenshot when able!