Now that you have reminded us, last post from 9card was Dec 2023, hope he/she/they/them is/are ok, I still think of John25, good soul.
This is from 2yrs ago, not sure why it's being posted around nowLaufende Diskussion zu SP, Seite 82880
Erste
82880
Zuletzt
Aktie
Malabra
2.120 Beiträge.
109
23.07.24 11:51 Beitragsnummer: 74871408
FÜR DIEJENIGEN UNTER UNS, DIE INGRISH BRAUCHEN:
Anlässlich einer Pressekonferenz im Hotel Rotana in Kinshasa am vergangenen Freitag, dem 15. Juli, hat Christian Lukusa, Vertreter des Bergbauunternehmens AVZ, die nationale Meinung darauf hingewiesen, dass das Unternehmen Dathcom täglich eine Million Dollar an Einnahmen und der kongolesische Staat 300.000 Dollar an Steuern hat hat verloren, weil es keine Meldung beim Bergbaukataster (CaMi) gibt. Im Rahmen dieser Veranstaltung wurden die Presse und die Öffentlichkeit nach Informationen und dem Recht auf Gegendarstellung gefragt, nachdem in jüngster Zeit falsche Aussagen und Behauptungen bezüglich bestimmter fehlerhafter Informationen über das Zinn- und Lithiumprojekt in Manono in der Provinz Tanganjika aufgetaucht waren. Laut Christian Lukusa besteht das Ziel dieser Aktionen darin, die kongolesischen Behörden dazu zu drängen, das Bergbaukataster zu informieren und AVZ sowie deren Partner zu informieren, damit sie über den Inhaber der tatsächlichen Lizenz und des Zinn- und Lithiumprojekts in Manono auf dem laufenden bleiben.
Tatsächlich hat AVZ vor weniger als drei Jahren eine Machbarkeitsstudie vorgelegt, die von der Firma Cominiere mit offenen Armen empfangen wurde. Diese wurden während der Verwaltungsratssitzungen nach der Entscheidung über die Machbarkeitsstudie und ihre Übersetzung ins Französische ermöglicht.
Darüber hinaus wurde dies durch fehlende Reaktionen nach der Einführung dieser Unterstützung im Bergbaukataster bemängelt. Laut Christian Lukusa besteht die Zusammenarbeit von AVZ und Cominiere bei der Umsetzung dieses Projekts seit langem und sie sind integraler Bestandteil des Verwaltungsrats der Firma AVZ. Anwalt Lukusa gibt an, dass
Die Demokratische Republik Kongo täglich 300.000 US-Dollar an Steuern und die Firma Dathcom täglich eine Million Dollar an Einnahmen verliert, weil sie das Bergbaukataster nicht meldet. Diese Lethargie kann das Land in komplizierte Situationen bringen, sagte er. Der Appell wurde soeben an die kongolesische Regierung gerichtet, die Genehmigung des Bergbaukatasters zu erteilen, das sie bei der Identifizierung des Projekts der Firma Dathcom blockiert hat, und nicht der AVZ, die nur der Aktionär ist, da Dathcom Teil einer Projektgesellschaft ist, die vom Ministerium für Finanzen wird betreut, um die Möglichkeit zu erhalten, das Projekt zu starten, Arbeitsplätze für die Bevölkerung zu schaffen, die Infrastruktur auszubauen und mehr.
Can't disagree that Nigel is who we are stuck with for better or worse. Any change to the board would almost certainly mean China twisting the knife and we would lose out big time. I also think this is somewhat personal for him now, understandably so.This thread has become absolute crud. Rather than decent discussion, its just pissed off punters who had a crack at making multiples and are stuck and salty.
I’m one of them, with several hundred k thrown in around 40-50c.
I took a gamble in a well known shithole with a resource that was always in retrospect going to be targeted by less governed entities. My fault, I blame nobody else for where that money sits.
But I for one am enjoying the silence right now, to me itmeans progress. Nigel has my full support, as any alternative is goodnight in my view.
If you enjoy the silence then you've come to the wrong place . This is a public forum . And no one has said they don't support the BoD . It's just their performance that has drawn criticism . I was critical 22 months ago . 22 months later I'm still critical .This thread has become absolute crud. Rather than decent discussion, its just pissed off punters who had a crack at making multiples and are stuck and salty.
I’m one of them, with several hundred k thrown in around 40-50c.
I took a gamble in a well known shithole with a resource that was always in retrospect going to be targeted by less governed entities. My fault, I blame nobody else for where that money sits.
But I for one am enjoying the silence right now, to me itmeans progress. Nigel has my full support, as any alternative is goodnight in my view.
A poodle and a collie were walking down the street. The poodle turned to the collie and complained, "My life is a mess. My owner is mean, my girlfriend is having an affair with a German shepherd, and I'm nervous as a cat."
I absolutely understand mate and agree fairer treatment would be ideal. I just don’t think it’s possible. How can anyone on the board say literally anything, especially to some of our shareholders without undoing what they are trying to achieve? It’s just not possible.Can't disagree that Nigel is who we are stuck with for better or worse. Any change to the board would almost certainly mean China twisting the knife and we would lose out big time. I also think this is somewhat personal for him now, understandably so.
I don't believe that means he cannot be criticized and we shouldn't be pushing for fairer treatment from the BOD. It leaves a bad taste in my mouth how we were communicated in the lead up to 2022 and now after the fact we are more in the dark than ever.
Maybe you can compartmentalize this, but for me the opportunity cost is eating up every waking moment of my days.
What’s better than eating a mandarin?A poodle and a collie were walking down the street. The poodle turned to the collie and complained, "My life is a mess. My owner is mean, my girlfriend is having an affair with a German shepherd, and I'm nervous as a cat."
"Why don't you go see a psychiatrist?" asked the collie.
"I can't," replied the poodle. "I'm not allowed on the couch."
Thibk we bought the same Bali tshirtI absolutely understand mate and agree fairer treatment would be ideal. I just don’t think it’s possible. How can anyone on the board say literally anything, especially to some of our shareholders without undoing what they are trying to achieve? It’s just not possible.
I can compartmentalise only because I’ve got solid mottos. Drink. Don’t let shit get to you. Drink. Repeat.
Maybe it was a bad time for me to do 'Dry July'... Funny, I was feeling just fine the other 24+ months?I absolutely understand mate and agree fairer treatment would be ideal. I just don’t think it’s possible. How can anyone on the board say literally anything, especially to some of our shareholders without undoing what they are trying to achieve? It’s just not possible.
I can compartmentalise only because I’ve got solid mottos. Drink. Don’t let shit get to you. Drink. Repeat.
You think our enemies don’t know the arbitration dates?This thread has become absolute crud. Rather than decent discussion, its just pissed off punters who had a crack at making multiples and are stuck and salty.
I’m one of them, with several hundred k thrown in around 40-50c.
I took a gamble in a well known shithole with a resource that was always in retrospect going to be targeted by less governed entities. My fault, I blame nobody else for where that money sits.
But I for one am enjoying the silence right now, to me itmeans progress. Nigel has my full support, as any alternative is goodnight in my view.
Come on mate. It has nothing to do with arbitration dates. It has everything to do with ANY progress in negotiations and who will get that info.You think our enemies don’t know the arbitration dates?
Or is it more likely that the suppression of the timeline is about quelling discontent amongst shareholders because it’s gonna take years until we get a decision before we then need to go try and enforce it
We are the owners of this company and deserve to know the key dates for the ICSID. And once again for the record I only have 15k invested in this mess because it’s a project in the DRC involving China.
Remember when AVZ management were frozen out of negotiations by the DRC government and we had to initiate the ICSID process. I did a post this time last year explaining how it was our only option under the mining code. Anyone who hasn’t realised by now that we’re going the distance unless we concede that we relinquished the north is completely delulu imoCome on mate. It has nothing to do with arbitration dates. It has everything to do with ANY progress in negotiations and who will get that info.
I still prefer silence.
"Anyone who hasn’t realised by now that we’re going the distance unless we concede that we relinquished the north is completely delulu imo."Remember when AVZ management were frozen out of negotiations by the DRC government and we had to initiate the ICSID process. I did a post this time last year explaining how it was our only option under the mining code. Anyone who hasn’t realised by now that we’re going the distance unless we concede that we relinquished the north is completely delulu imo