Maybe Locke is waiting for (pending?) news/indications to come out from the new government MoM &/or ICC & ICSID arbitration to built stronger conviction before committing. Our BOD doesn't want to expose anything in their hand, only providing bare minimum for public consumption. It's a very tight game atm. Our opponents just need to scan these threads & X to get a read on what's exposed - loose lips etc. Same goes for Zijin/Cominiere, however, they appear to be involved in a bluff scenario - putting out public material on their local activities. Trying to convince everyone (DRC officials & AVZ) that they are the real deal.Fuck me, it’s like the CATH extensions that went on for a billion years. What a fucking shit show
"...worked with dedication, loyalty, and competence"
It’s really the only funding we need right now thoughAVZ can engage with other parties for different forms of funding ......but specifically not "Litigation Funding" which is the specific type of funding that Locke has an exclusivity on for it's DD period
You're assuming they're open to illegal activity?Has anyone considered that Zijin could very easily pay off Locke to string out the D.D.
"The Company is pleased to report Locke has now completed its due diligence and is working with AVZ to agree the terms of a formal agreement."30/04Has anyone considered that Zijin could very easily pay off Locke to string out the D.D.
This would be a breach of ethical standards and open Locke to litigation.Has anyone considered that Zijin could very easily pay off Locke to string out the D.D.
So we'd need litigation funding for a case against our litigation funders? My brain hurts.This would be a breach of ethical standards and open Locke to litigation.
You know, i remember a couple of posters on this forum imploring that we should shut our mouths regards to Locke funding as it just fuels ammunition for our enemies to double down on their efforts to exploit AVZ achilles heel regards to lack of funds, yet here we have AVZ bod illuminating that very fact publicly......
View attachment 64924
I don't believe Manono Lithium has been given the green light to continue disrupting the Manono town without proper approval from the population of Manono and/or the Governor of Tanganyika.....
It doesn't look like Felix gives a toss.
It comes under the win win principle.
Do you think we'll ever get our money back or even make a quidSo we'd need litigation funding for a case against our litigation funders? My brain hurts.
The e-Courts page for the Supreme Court hearings on Monday has been updated this afternoon and I also can’t find any references to our hearing now - other peoples matters being heard in Chambers are still listed.I wonder if your search brings up live material? Both myself and @Mr_Tones83 can no longer find any references to any date for any hearing as of this morning - I could yesterday
I've deliberately stuck it up tolate's left nostril on HC, and I get silence