Spikerama
Regular
Well spotted. Typo before my coffee. I will leave it as is, to remind me to be more diligent.
Last edited:
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Cumquat Cap
Regular
Some light reading as to the Pakistan case in the Australian context: https://www.allens.com.au/insights-news/insights/2019/07/australian-investor-wins-big-at-icsid/
Cumquat Cap
Regular
And you’re right Silent One on a few counts being we are stuck with this board which I completely agree and am fine with and that ICSID absolutely have the power to destroy the DRC (basically force them to issue the ml to Barrick).
Our issue with that path is can our detractors Hoover up enough shares to disrupt the AGM (easier with the little amount of info filtered down from management) and do we have the funds to stick it out through appeals.
Anyways won’t discuss my thoughts publically as it’s not going to help get a return but I do respect your comments Silent One, keep them up. Cheers
Our issue with that path is can our detractors Hoover up enough shares to disrupt the AGM (easier with the little amount of info filtered down from management) and do we have the funds to stick it out through appeals.
Anyways won’t discuss my thoughts publically as it’s not going to help get a return but I do respect your comments Silent One, keep them up. Cheers
So on that we have about 5 more years to go fuck me
Dave Evans
Regular
AMG's? Are we talking about lambo's and ferrarri's again?
@Thaz , I've was putting together a few notes here and there and wondered if you, Deboss, @protoje and anyone else that received an unsolicited offer from Jamie Mitchell was interested in sharing any information privately that I can pass on to my lawyer. He's been interested in AVZ's progress since we first discussed buying shares in AVZ several years ago but hasn't been keeping up to date with events since the suspension and has relied on me to let him know how things are going.
I have found information linking Jamie Mitchell to Shane (der geist) Eastwood which might suggest that Jamie Mitchell unlawfully tried to acquire shares in AVZ. I am looking into what legal actions can be taken regarding Jamie Mitchell's unsolicited attempts to buy AVZ shares and believe he may either have to prove he has no link to Eastwood or face the consequences of this action.
Here are a few notes gathered from shareholders, but I have other evidence that I have not shared on any threads.
Panther22
I called Automic today. Long long wait times so hopefully this helps.
1/ Automic will be sending shareholders an AVZ Holding Statement shortly.
2/ They are aware of the Jamie Mitchell's e mail and it is being investigated as to who this.
3/ Automic said they would not have given our e mail address to Mitchell, so Mitchell's first sentence is a lie.
4/ Automic are working with AVZ on this matter as expected.
James Mitchell = JamieM12341234???
Joined Twitter X May 2024
Thaz
It seems that Jamie Mitchell has updated his email in lieu of AVZ announcements
PutUsernameHere
Direct from ASIC: https://asic.gov.au/for-business/running-a-company/company-shareholders/#company-info
Anyone has a right to inspect a copy of a company’s share register. As a member, you may inspect the register free of charge. However, the company may charge other people to inspect the register. The inspection fee is set out in Sch 4 of the Corporations Regulations 2001 (Corporations Regulations).
Anyone has a right to request a copy of a company’s share register. A company must provide a copy of the register to you within seven days of you requesting the copy. The maximum fee for supplying a copy of the register is set out in Sch 4 of the Corporations Regulations.
When requesting a copy, you must provide your name, address and the purpose of your request.
You cannot obtain a copy of a register for an improper purpose, such as:
- soliciting a donation from a membe
- soliciting a member of a company as a stockbroker or sharebroker
- gathering information about the personal wealth of a member, or
- making an unsolicited offer to purchase financial products such as shares or units off-market
- if the company keeps the register on a computer, the company must provide the copy in the format set out in Part 2C.1 of the Corporations Regulations.
.ch
.com
Offers .005, but forgot to change his calculations (.0001x500000) =2,500
Doc
proton mail....hmmmmmm....i've only ever seen that one used before by one other person.....
Thaz
Who might that be? A quick search yields the following - Link below
AVZ Discussion 2022MMGA, their Chinese backers, The Age and SMH and possibly the Alliance Advisory Firm who are running MMGA’s campaign are running the same story that Tommy and the AFR put out way back in April. It just shows how desperate they are and they probably know they have already lost the institutional...
Alternatively you may contact AVZ Minerals in accordance with the above AVZ Announcement
Last edited:
Cumquat Cap
Regular
Doing the lords work as always Dave, great stuff
It's a great initiative and considering if each unsolicited offer is an offence, how many offences will be charged?
I haven't received any offer yet and won't sell cheap.
Hi Dave, I also received an email offer. I would assume they know how many shares we have.
Bin59
Regular
Hi Dave, I reported my email to the company for them to take the appropriate action. The email had been broadcast to a number (15-16) of other recipients.
Prod
Emerged
Hey Dave,
Keep up the great fight, I don't normally reply on TSE but have been on here since inception. I have not received any offers but not sure if it's because I've requested to be removed from their data base when they first got a hold of our info.
Cheers
I also got a unsolicited offer mate
PutUsernameHere
Regular
The fact that a number of shareholders who either unsubscribed or told MMGA to fuck off didn't receive these unsolicited offers is pretty damn telling of where people's information is likely to have come from; in my opinion of course. There are only two ways they could have gotten this information. They requested it from the share registry, in which case they've directly breached the purpose of accessing this information. OR, someone has provided it to them, and they've breached privacy laws in doing so.
Would be interesting to know if there was anyone who unsubscribed from MMGA who did receive an unsolicited offer. And vice versa, those who remained receiving their communications but have not received an offer.
Spikerama
Regular
I didn't get one but I also unsubbed SMEGMA immediately.
Hey Dave. Great work. I forwarded my email offer to AVZ. They didn’t have much to say - as below. Happy to pass it on to you as well if it would help- let me know how I’d do that.
Attachments
Dave Evans
Regular
Thanks, I am just questioning the share purchase and it’s important to understand that I not making accusations. It’s very distressing to myself and other shareholders when the AVZ share register details are passed on to third parties to make unsolicited offers to purchase shares.
Last edited:
TheGermanOne
Emerged
Serious question: Will our enemies now try to acquire the necessary numbers of shares to replace the bord and sell the project to themselfs for a cheaper price? Can the regulators in this case intervene?
I reckon I unsubscribed, and I didn’t receive an email.
Cumquat Cap
Regular
I told MMGA to shove it up their assholes and haven’t received an offer
Similar threads
