AVZ Discussion 2022

BEISHA

Top 20
Possibly. But lip service is all you will ever get from any company's management. That's why I don't bother talking to any of them. They're hardly going to admit wrongdoing or let you know if things are actually bad because EGM's can still be called when listed or not listed leading to them losing their jobs.

Also, there isn't a soap strong enough on this planet for me to ever shake hands with Brewer. You're a brave man.
slam dunk.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users

RHyNO

Regular
There would be various options on how to proceed if we can get our positive outcome for AVZ.
We just have to wait to see what they decide to do. But I have no doubt they will be choosing whatever option sees best shareholder returns possible, risk factors included.

They might relist on another exchange as they said in the announcement.
They might pay a divvy, which would suck because of taxes.
But if they sell the asset, then we get stuck with DRC tax on the sale before we see any of it.
If they wind up the company I think we can get our cap gains discount.

I know it's just hypothetical, but 10 bux is a bit ambitious after all the shit, hey but you never know.

If someone has more indepth knowledge about possibly outcomes for shareholder payouts, I'd love to hear about it.
Thanks mate! Yeah agree $10 is rich. Zinjin if your watching I’d take $3
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9 users

Flekman11

Member
Yep, looks like we're all bitches who can't get buyers for our shares.
Supply and demand moron. Make ‘em sweat not knowing what they can and can’t get. Especially good being delisted. But hey if you like panic selling go for it. I’ll buy, PM me.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 6 users

Thaz

Regular
It depends on how the share / asset sale is structured

Could be a merger / acquisition, in which they could issue shares in the acquiring entity, or cash, or a mixture of both.


All 3 have different taxation implications.

But high level, I would imagine that we would only be entitled to a return of capital upon winding up the company.

After which, itl be a dividend from the company. Company's generally cannot payout a capital distribution that is not a pre cgt gain (i.e. if we sold manono rights. The cap gains in the company would be treated as part of the retained earnings of the company (i.e. payout as dividends)

Ofc, they may structure the deal differently which would have different taxation implications...and also depends on the inherent corporate structure of avz
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 users

Flekman11

Member
Someone smart play this out for me, we offload the entire asset, for a price that puts the company at let’s say $10 per share? How do we as shareholders sell our shares at that value? Or will management do a dividend? If so what would encourage them to do so? Like how can I now sell my shares if they are at a price without being on market? Are we not now existing at the behest of management? Thanks in advance. FKA Tommy the journalist of Gina.
$10 is probably a long way from reality mate but if it goes this way, the likely course is AVZ accepting (subject to shareholder approval, a right you still retain) an offer for our Dathcom share, we take the cash and distribute on a per share basis less a fair bit in various costs. That’s about it mate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users

BEISHA

Top 20

Slightly offtopic article, but relevant in the wests quest to to divert away from China / Russia dependence of critical minerals etc.

I mean we dont really know what influence the west is applying to the DRC govt regards to Manono, but maybe we got a clue from @Frank previous post regards to FT being pissed about " lecturing "

One thing is for sure , outside looking in, its diabolical that AVZ has to fight the might of China and the corruption of DRC on its own regards to what simply is the most influencial lithium asset globally going around by a country mile, whereby who ever owns it, dictates and controls.

China must be stopped!

imo
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 17 users

Flekman11

Member

Slightly offtopic article, but relevant in the wests quest to to divert away from China / Russia dependence of critical minerals etc.

I mean we dont really know what influence the west is applying to the DRC govt regards to Manono, but maybe we got a clue from @Frank previous post regards to FT being pissed about " lecturing "

One thing is for sure , outside looking in, its diabolical that AVZ has to fight the might of China and the corruption of DRC on its own regards to what simply is the most influencial lithium asset globally going around by a country mile, whereby who ever owns it, dictates and controls.

China must be stopped!

imo
Agree. Only problem is we all have China in every part of our lives, and none of us will it up will we.
 
  • Thinking
Reactions: 1 users
Agree. Only problem is we all have China in every part of our lives, and none of us will it up will we.
I've been avoiding "made in china" more & more for the last ~10 years, since CCP/Xi Jinping aggression in South China Sea, & many other examples before & since, and especially so in the last 2 years with China's efforts to further corrupt/rob the DRC and AVZ.
Every bit helps.
Reduce, reuse, recycle helps. Hoover 720 washing machine is 50yo (re-furb motor every 10 years) - made in Oz? 30yo Fisher & Paykel fridge - made in Oz. 25yo Air-Con made in Japan. 19yo car/Pajero made in Japan. The Pajero will last until I can get an EV with solid state Li-Ion batteries, powerful enough to tow 1500Kg with 800+Km range & after AVZ I will never buy a made in China EV.
I have nothing against the ordinary Chinese people, just the CCP autocracy and dictatorship - absolute power corrupts absolutely.
IMO. DYOR. Br Sparrowhawk12
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Love
Reactions: 38 users

Frank

Top 20
1714910834733.png



1714911000189.png



1714910779640.png

1714910881758.png


1714911119520.png

1714911144537.png


1714911196492.png


1714911230197.png




1714911274316.png


1714911311326.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Sad
Reactions: 20 users

Frank

Top 20
1714913022390.png


1714913042444.png


1714913111888.png



1714913218882.png


1714913256111.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Thinking
Reactions: 15 users

Frank

Top 20
1714914165727.png


1714914203486.png


1714914237948.png


1714914343696.png


1714914475489.png


1714914580642.png



1714914508958.png


1714914525667.png
 
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Haha
Reactions: 17 users

lellep

Regular
DRC goverment and officials are nothing more than a sick joke. I genuinely hope they will answer for the crimes they are committing as they are keeping their country in despair and poverty. With war in the east, poverty, no jobs, politicians exploiting the people they have sworn to serve.

But I doubt anything will happen due to the spineless hypocrite president.

Bring on the ICC, we want our money back.
It may take years but in the end we will prevail and the ones who end up paying are probably not even the people who caused this mess.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Fire
  • Sad
Reactions: 18 users

wombat74

Top 20
  • Like
  • Sad
Reactions: 7 users

marksmann007

Regular
Have these corrupt muppets considered how much slimmer the Chinese brown paper bags they receive would be not to mention what the Chinese would offer to pay for anything in the DRC if the West gave up on any investment in the DRC or the DRC refused to deal with the West going forward?
I’d be guessing 90% less.
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 14 users

robface

Regular
Supply and demand moron. Make ‘em sweat not knowing what they can and can’t get. Especially good being delisted. But hey if you like panic selling go for it. I’ll buy, PM me.
Nah mate it's all made public here as the point of my thread. What's your buy price?
 

Frank

Top 20
1714953517292.png


1714953555739.png


1714953617414.png


#Disbelief.jpg
 
  • Like
  • Fire
Reactions: 16 users

RHyNO

Regular
$10 is probably a long way from reality mate but if it goes this way, the likely course is AVZ accepting (subject to shareholder approval, a right you still retain) an offer for our Dathcom share, we take the cash and distribute on a per share basis less a fair bit in various costs. That’s about it mate.
Yeah mate thanks. I certainly don’t think $10
Is anywhere near what is real, but was just mentioning it for ease of math and not to attract the ire of the disgruntled hopefuls. In all sincerity $1.30 would be a great price and a fair one!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users

wombat74

Top 20
Yeah mate thanks. I certainly don’t think $10
Is anywhere near what is real, but was just mentioning it for ease of math and not to attract the ire of the disgruntled hopefuls. In all sincerity $1.30 would be a great price and a fair one!
How do you come up with a $1.30 ?That wouldn't cover bank interest lost for some punters , and what about the punters who got in higher than $1.30 ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10 users

RHyNO

Regular
How do you come up with a $1.30 ?That wouldn't cover bank interest lost for some punters , and what about the punters who got in higher than $1.30
I’d bet you anything that the majority of holders would take $1.30 to walk away from all this. I’m sorry to those who Bought in above. Speculative market, not a real market, real market, what’s in ground minus cost of getting it to market looks more like $4 yeah?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users

Spikerama

Regular
Oooh, I can hear Jeannie coming...
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
Top Bottom