AVZ Discussion 2022

[Flight996]

Meanwhile Jin Chen/Zijin continues to drill-out the north-eastern section of Roche Dure unhindered until the second part of the 15% issue is arbitrated.

I hope they share their results with us. It would be the gentlemanly thing to do.

 

[Doc]

Meanwhile Jin Chen/Zijin continues to drill-out the north-eastern section of Roche Dure unhindered until the second part of the 15% issue is arbitrated.

I hope they share their results with us. It would be the gentlemanly thing to do.

Maybe they really mining and just saying they are 'drilling cores', they just happen to be 500mm apart.
Get enough cores with the good grades it'll be worth a buck or two.
Hey theres a thought Nigel, sell our cores when the cash gets too low

 

[Uglybob]

Lets face it, if Z are in there strip mining the place under the guise of drilling, the only ones who would be surprised would be the DRC officials. Good luck on them getting their royalties...

 

[Xerof]

OK, Friday funnies.


I’ll start

In Adrian Edmonson's (of the Young Ones) autobiography ("Berserker") he claims the following limerick is the best he's ever heard. It's certainly "up there":

"Come down to Llanelli my boy
For a fuck you will really enjoy
At the height of catharsis
What you'll feel up your arse is
The tongue of a corgi called Roy"

 

[Spikerama]

OK, Friday funnies.


I’ll start

In Adrian Edmonson's (of the Young Ones) autobiography ("Berserker") he claims the following limerick is the best he's ever heard. It's certainly "up there":

"Come down to Llanelli my boy
For a fuck you will really enjoy
At the height of catharsis
What you'll feel up your arse is
The tongue of a corgi called Roy"

I like Adrian Edmonson. And Rick Mayall. Saw them live once. However I don't find that funny.

Maybe I'm too old now for Bottom poetry.

 

[Pokok]

I think this is a really good joke ,, I married 4 times , WHAT a moment that is as not as funny as I think

 

[Winenut]

Don’t understand why we aren’t employing local security teams to ensure the exact area we have “good legal title on” is not secured. As if they wouldn’t take out all our spod at the same fucking time. I mean it would cost probably 100k au per year for a staff of 10 of the biggest local boys we could put together. If anything to intimidate, at least. At most to ensure “good legal title” is not another lie hatched by his grace the untouchable Nigel and his endless unproven genius.

Zijin would pay them off in 2 seconds flat

 

[Doc]

Zijin would pay them off in 2 seconds flat

Thought we had security on the core shed. I’m sure it was mentioned here

 

[Nellie17]

Don’t understand why we aren’t employing local security teams to ensure the exact area we have “good legal title on” is not secured. As if they wouldn’t take out all our spod at the same fucking time. I mean it would cost probably 100k au per year for a staff of 10 of the biggest local boys we could put together. If anything to intimidate, at least. At most to ensure “good legal title” is not another lie hatched by his grace the untouchable Nigel and his endless unproven genius.

G'day Tommy,

May I ask, how do you know that we're not employing security of any sorts?

Cheers,
Nellie

 

[David Krappenschitz]

My big question is why haven't the DRC followed the ICSID interim orders and reinstated Dathcom to Manono area. Why did they the DRC challenge the interim order / what is their reason for challenging it? Where do they see AVZ in Manono and what is it exactly that the DRC gov wants from AVZ? Do they want AVZ gone from the project?
A simple reinstatement of title to Dathcom/AVZ in Manono 13359 as ICSID directed would be a major step forward, why haven't they done this?

 

[Bray]

My big question is why haven't the DRC followed the ICSID interim orders and reinstated Dathcom to Manono area. Why did they the DRC challenge the interim order / what is their reason for challenging it? Where do they see AVZ in Manono and what is it exactly that the DRC gov wants from AVZ? Do they want AVZ gone from the project?
A simple reinstatement of title to Dathcom/AVZ in Manono 13359 as ICSID directed would be a major step forward, why haven't they done this?

Because you’re using logic and logic doesn’t apply to DRC

 

[wombat74]

My big question is why haven't the DRC followed the ICSID interim orders and reinstated Dathcom to Manono area. Why did they the DRC challenge the interim order / what is their reason for challenging it? Where do they see AVZ in Manono and what is it exactly that the DRC gov wants from AVZ? Do they want AVZ gone from the project?
A simple reinstatement of title to Dathcom/AVZ in Manono 13359 as ICSID directed would be a major step forward, why haven't they done this?

Because they are stalling in the hope either Fat Tail are victorious or AVZ run out of money . Felix has been able to duck and weave and effectively let his corrupt homie scum dog CKK deflect the bullets . That's about to change . IMO

 

[Dave Evans]

G'day Tommy,

May I ask, how do you know that we're not employing security of any sorts?

Cheers,
Nellie

Nell’s you do realise this tommy is RHyN)1980 and he doesn’t actually have any satellite images showing that Zijin has damaged the camp

 

[Frank]

 

[Frank]

 

[Dijon101]

I’m here for insights from much more informed investors than I.

 

[Mr_Tones83]

Read it as moving towards the formal part of the process whereby both sides put forward their complete brief of evidence??
from Chat GPT

In the context of ICSID arbitration, the "memorial" is typically lodged at the beginning of the arbitration process. It is one of the initial written submissions presented by one of the parties to the dispute. The memorial sets out the party's position, legal arguments, and supporting evidence at the outset of the arbitration proceedings.

Edit: I have no idea really!!

You and Carlos are correct, this is in relation to the merits of the case. From the 'Disputes update' announcement under the title dispute section:

"In the substantive proceedings, the next procedural step is for the AVZI, GLH and Dathcom to file their statement of claim by 20 March 2024."

I think it won't be too long for us to hear what's happening re: non-compliance with the interim measures at ICSID. Any further non-compliance of interim measures won't be a good look when it comes to a ruling against the DRC (including on award of costs). Especially combined with Cominiere's non-compliance with the ICC interim orders.

It will be embarrassment galore on a whole for the DRC if something drastic isn't resolved soon.

 

[Jazz]

Oh sorry Nell’s and Dave the name change is an attempt at humour, yep it’s me big RHyNO. The satellite images were posted here Dave. I’m surprised you aren’t across it. Our logo has been removed from the camp, sheds destroyed. Trucks burned. it’s in pretty bad shape. I’m not suggesting this is the work of zinjin TIA but Zinjin are setting up drill rigs. This is confirmed, also here. simply talking about the investment. And responding with sincerity to Nell’s question. It’s a sincere question. Why is there no discussion of security of the site? It’s not in the announcements. In my opinion we should be locking that shit down and making it challenging for anyone to get near us. have they done this? IDK doesn’t look like it. Should they do it. Feels like they should but I’m not in strip mining lithium. Perhaps someone here in the know can offer some insight as to why or why not. I thought paying 20 locals to clean up was a great move. I think it would be an additional good move to secure the site with local workers, considering the way Chinese miners behave at various African goldfields blatantly undermining other sites, blocking tunnels etc. I’m here for insights from much more informed investors than I. It’s why I propose questions about what we are doing. And don’t engage in tit for tat commentary.

I don't recall the satellite images showing what you are describing with regard to sheds being destroyed.

But yes, the sign was removed over a year or so ago:

Can you provide details of where buildings have been destroyed?

 

[Frank]