That’s just it, I already have and you are none the wiser.
AVZ Discussion 2022
- Thread starter GazDix
- Start date
Your grand intelligence is in question, when the depth you go into is "giving them oxygen". Yes, the company trying to steal a resource in the 10s of billions only requires people telling them they're wrong to post misinformation to potentially 20000 holders in order to assist the process of stealing said resource.
Is your intelligence such that you needed to see a minister of mines post twice on two seperate platforms?
As I said, continue to be passive as someone steals your money. Your decision.
Remark
Top 20
You do realise that you are now bringing here the same ridiculous tit for tat argument that is so fucking annoying on the crapper? Just drop it.
For the record, below is my response to the first post that brought the ridiculous crap here. I tried to change paths immediately. See bold.
Do you need 2 platforms that have the same users discussing the same news or think HC is some holy ground that literally can't be replicated at a place that you're having this very discussion. Bullshit you're now bringing here mind you.
You're not going to get some magic information on HC that couldn't be gained here or on twitter. I'll continue to treat it as a gutter, you're welcome to do whatever you like. Do you perhaps feel like getting on with the discussion at hand?
Give him a break, the toilet hasn't posted for the last 18 hours, so he feels lonely and comes here for a breather from the cesspit.
You're more than welcome to read the series of posts that lead to yours. I only post here when I have something of value to add as I believe I did in regards to the MOM and ambassador post, or defend saying what I beleive to be true. Elsewise, I just read.
I did not bring up anything off topic here. You are now continuing the bullshit, is that what you want?
TheCount
Regular
@Cominiere also hasn't been posting much of late... Coincidentally went silent not long after I said he was with der geist in a human centipede!!
TC.
TheCount
Regular
Spoke too soon - the admin clerk is back spewing bullshit replies.......
Cumquat Cap
Regular
Ask for a discharge form also and they will jump straight on it, much better to keep clients then originating new business. Great call Daz
Faarkin banks are as bad as Zijin!! haha
Carlos Danger
Top 20
must be a typo right, meaning 2020? Otherwise doesn't fitby it's letter dated 31 December 2021?
clutching.....
give us the answer
Anyway Carlos can you tell us why Cong's argument was flawed? As reading this document hurt my brain a litle.
Apart from already having agreed to the price and had deposits paid. Something to do with the 'regular extraordinary meeting'? Which as an aside seems a condradiction in terms. Or that the assignor can at any time cancel the assignation of shares? That seems to go against the contract terms.
Last edited:
Carlos Danger
Top 20
by it's letter dated 31 December 2021?
clutching.....
give us the answer
No one outside of the parties involved has seen the SPA's. The only clues we have are from this court record and AVZ's official announcements. Both of those sources agree that completion of the transactions occurs when payment hits da bank. Cong cites Article 2.1 of the SPA's for this fact. This event occurred on or about 13/8/21 according to AVZ and on 16/8/21 according to Dathomir which is backed up by the bank statement.
The only thing that could have stopped it was a domestic stay of payment but the writ for that was served to AVZ on 28/8/21 which is after completion occurred according to Cong's timeline of events
As for the need for a Dathcom EGM this was not a condition precedent of the SPA's according to AVZ. Cong says it 'should' have happened because it occurred in previous transfers but he doesn't cite anything from the agreements when claiming this.
Without going into the long boring details of OHADA the article that Cong cites about waiving the sale is about negotiations using an expert to value the shares in an absence of agreements. The judge was never asked to rule on the merits of his arguments about termination and repeatedly recognises the need for this matter to be heard by an arbitral judge. The ICC taking on these cases indicates to me that they are the ones named in the SPA's for dispute resolution just like in the Dathcom JVA and they have agreed with AVZ on everything so far.
Obviously I would need to read the SPA's to know for sure if Cong has grounds for termination or renegotiation but the fact that both parties have acknowledged that completion occurs on payment, Cong couldn't back up his EGM claim from the agreements themselves and the ICC are hearing the cases and resticting Dathomir's actions within the DRC is enough for me. And DLA Piper too obvs
Last edited:
Similar threads
