Reason No.2...This is why China wants to get its grubby hands on Manono amongst other things...
Analysis
China’s BYD has more than Tesla in its sights
David Fickling
It may be just one-tenth the size of Tesla in terms of market capitalisation, but BYD has just pulled ahead to become the world’s biggest producer of battery passenger cars. For its next trick, it’s going to take on the world.
To many, BYD remains a little-known car brand, more familiar from business-news articles citing Warren Buffett’s 2008 investment in the Chinese EV maker than sightings of actual vehicles out on the road.
Yet the vast volume of its sales in China, combined with a growing number overseas, means it overtook its American rival in the December quarter. The 526,409 vehicles delivered over the period pipped Tesla’s 484,507. This milestone if anything underplays BYD’s growing might.
Throw in trucks, buses and plug-in hybrids, and BYD’s sales total is 75 per cent higher than the number for pure battery cars, at 918,807. More importantly, on almost every financial metric, the Chinese company is either advancing on, or overtaking, its American rival – with its gaze already set on the wider car industry.
While many competitors have struggled amid the wave of discounting that’s hit the EV sector over the past year, BYD has prospered. In contrast to Tesla, which racked up years of losses before turning profitable in 2019, it has hardly ever posted negative operating income – and in the September quarter came within a whisker of the reinvigorated US company’s $US1.76 billion ($2.6 billion) result. By owning its own battery supply chain and focusing on cheaper, less zippy cells that use abundant iron and phosphate instead of scarce cobalt and nickel, it’s managed to lift margins even as materials costs rose.
That translates into industry-beating financial performance. Most Chinese car companies post uninspiring single-digit returns on equity, giving shareholders little reason to prefer their stock to investment-grade corporate bonds that yield 5.8 per cent. BYD, on the other hand, is spitting out profits that have led to the best returns on equity among major carmakers.
Returns on invested capital, a metric that encompasses how successful the company is at generating profits from its asset base, are also the best among volume car makers worldwide, and have risen consistently for the past 18 months to overtake Tesla.
You might expect this performance would induce the sort of shareholder euphoria that has caused Elon Musk’s company to be valued at a 64-times forward price-earnings ratio. Far from it: while BYD’s 13.5 ratio is a premium to the 7.95-times P/E ratio on the Hang Seng Index, it’s priced at a discount to India’s Tata Motors and the 19.7-times multiple of the S&P 500, and not far above mainstream carmakers such as Toyota and Ford.
After a $US12 billion selloff during November, BYD is as cheap as it has been going back to the start of 2010, despite 31 out of 32 analysts putting a Buy rating on the stock.
The most substantive argument against BYD right now is that it has grown too far, too fast.
Despite overtaking Honda, Toyota and Volkswagen to snatch the crown as China’s best-selling car marque over the past few years, its vehicles aren’t exactly rushing off dealership lots: there were 1.91 cars sitting in inventory for every one sold in November, a number that’s grown from 1.04 a year earlier even as prices have fallen about 6.2 per cent.
This is high even by the standards of a Chinese industry that’s plagued with oversupply, and suggests flagging consumer appetite for vehicles that most reviewers seem to find more stolid than compelling.
That’s a small negative when placed against the wealth of positive metrics BYD can now boast – and if you think boring cars don’t have a future, it’s worth remembering that the bestselling four-wheeler in history is the Toyota Corolla, or that this entire industry was kicked off by a vehicle that, famously, was usually only available in black.
BYD is already setting its horizons well beyond China, with one in 10 of its cars sold overseas during December, compared to one in 40 in July 2022. The EV maker announced a new assembly factory last month in Hungary, and others are reportedly under consideration in Mexico. Such investments would mirror Japanese and South Korean car makers, who got around protectionist tariffs since the 1980s by building production lines in key destination markets.
If its current trajectory is anything to go by, BYD’s relatively little-known status outside China is about to change drastically. In years to come, we’ll look back on 2024 as the year it joined the ranks of Tesla, Hyundai, Toyota, Volkswagen and Ford as formerly obscure car brands that went on to bestride the world.
BLOOMBERG
Dwayne Sparkes
@sparkes_dwayne
No coffee today as I spat it out reading Goldman Sachs' lithium supply table which popped up in my twitter feed. What i find most intriguing about this table is that it states the majority of lithium supply will come from China itself, in particular internal lepidolite and brine. In my opinion, this is unrealistic and the numbers don't quite seem logical. Lets break down the lepidolite numbers: They are predicting that 462,000t of LCE will be produced internally from Chinese lepidolite in the year 2030. Using a previous post of mine (i'll put the link in the comments below), for a lepidolite ore of grade 0.55%, you need approximately 14 tonnes of lepidolite to get SC6 equivalent. Roughly 6 tonnes of SC6 is needed for 1 tonne of LCE. You need around about 14 * 6 = 84 tonnes of lepidolite ore grading 0.55% to get 1 tonne of LCE...