When did Zijin first disclose to the market any of their actions taken in regard to their purported acquisition of 15% of Dathcom from Cominiere?In that case I hope the door hit them in the arse on the way out
Not correct. To register an Abstain you need to vote, and tick abstain.I assume that if Shareholders do not vote, their holding will be counted as abstain? Can anyone confirm?
Ok, apart from the 3 fuckwits we don’t want on the board how did you pick and choose who to vote for ?
@9cardomaha reckons we should have an answer on the jurisdictional challenge first week of November. Could be sooner or later tho. That's if Zijin haven't already withdrawn due to no longer claiming to have the 15% and therefore not needing to be recognised in Dathcom lolOops, reposting in correct thread.
"The sole arbitrator will determine a procedural timetable in the coming weeks, with the company providing an update."
What exactly is a procedural timetable in this setting. Are we likely to hear anything definitive after the 90 minute hearing? It is two weeks since the hearing took place, can't be far off hearing some news.
@9cardomaha reckons we should have an answer on the jurisdictional challenge first week of November. Could be sooner or later tho. That's if Zijin haven't already withdrawn due to no longer claiming to have the 15% and therefore not needing to be recognised in Dathcom lol
The cheap skates probably sent it by surface mail.I can tell you snail mail from Australia to NZ is pathetically slow. I still haven't received my green toilet paper, and I'm dying for a crap
Perhaps I'll never get it, in which case I'll print out their email and use that instead
I'll take that bet. They know they are going to lose and will try to save face. They have a far better chance of getting the north than being recognised in Dathcom hence their offer to Cominiere a year ago imoI bet they haven't withdrawn, cos they know this 15575 partition is contestable BS
I hear you, but the ICC will put the fault on COMINIERE surely, so thats the face saver IMO. (and it continues the 'anything to delay' mantra)I'll take that bet. They know they are going to lose and will try to save face. They have a far better chance of getting the north than being recognised in Dathcom hence their offer to Cominiere a year ago imo
IMO of course. Vote for what the AVZ Board has recommended 1, 18-22. That's what the green card recommends.Ok, apart from the 3 fuckwits we don’t want on the board how did you pick and choose who to vote for ?
Do you know some of them or amount of stock held ?
Interested in your reasoning or just some dart chucking..lol
Yes in the case brought by AVZ against Cominiere. Zijin have nothing to do with that case if they withdraw from the case they brought or AVZ's jurisdictional challenge is successful. China playbook 101 is delay through lawfare with an off ramp if the case has no hope just like the tariffs against Australia at the WTO imoI hear you, but the ICC will put the fault on COMINIERE surely, so thats the face saver IMO. (and it continues the 'anything to delay' mantra)
You on the sauce already Dazza? It's been 2 weeks African time maybe, it's actually been 3 weeks Australian timeOops, reposting in correct thread.
"The sole arbitrator will determine a procedural timetable in the coming weeks, with the company providing an update."
What exactly is a procedural timetable in this setting. Are we likely to hear anything definitive after the 90 minute hearing? It is two weeks since the hearing took place, can't be far off hearing some news.
Thanks CD, well that is next week! I hope we still get to uncover the details of the hearing and it is utterly embarrassing for Zijin and Comminiere! By the way 9card is a freak - international man of mystery!!@9cardomaha reckons we should have an answer on the jurisdictional challenge first week of November. Could be sooner or later tho. That's if Zijin haven't already withdrawn due to no longer claiming to have the 15% and therefore not needing to be recognised in Dathcom lol
I am definitely not a lawyer but surely if a case goes through it's first hearing, then the side that initiated the case pulls out after the hearing has been heard and the outcome is likely not to be in their favour, that is quite clearly delay tactics and AVZ could initiate a counter trial that you would hope would have a quick turnaround?Yes in the case brought by AVZ against Cominiere. Zijin have nothing to do with that case if they withdraw from the case they brought or AVZ's jurisdictional challenge is successful. China playbook 101 is delay through lawfare with an off ramp if the case has no hope just like the tariffs against Australia at the WTO imo
A counter trial for what?I am definitely not a lawyer but surely if a case goes through it's first hearing, then the side that initiated the case pulls out after the hearing has been heard and the outcome is likely not to be in their favour, that is quite clearly delay tactics and AVZ could initiate a counter trial that you would hope would have a quick turnaround?
Holy cow, you are correct 6th November. Even more pissed off at how long it is taking now. FFS!You on the sauce already Dazza? It's been 2 weeks African time maybe, it's actually been 3 weeks Australian time
THAT.....was exactly the question that smashed into my brain as soon as I read the words "Bellamel sold before the suspension" for the very reason potential insider tradingWhen did Zijin first disclose to the market any of their actions taken in regard to their purported acquisition of 15% of Dathcom from Cominiere?
A purported acquisition they have now given up on which caused AVZ stock to lose value before being forced into suspension
When did Bellamel sell?
View attachment 48179